• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恩替卡韦酯治疗的患者停药或换药(替诺福韦艾拉酚胺)后 HBV 复发率。

HBV relapse rates in patients who discontinue tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with or without switching to tenofovir alafenamide.

机构信息

Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan.

Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Linkuo Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan.

出版信息

Dig Liver Dis. 2023 Jun;55(6):771-777. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.01.154. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2023.01.154
PMID:36737315
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The incidence and relapse pattern in patients stopping tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a prodrug of tenofovir which is more concentrated in hepatocytes, is unknown.

METHODS

HBeAg-negative CHB patients stopping tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) (off-TDF) or who had switched to TAF more than 3 months before discontinuation (off-TAF) were recruited. The propensity score-matching method (PSM) was used, creating a ratio of 1:3 between the off-TAF versus the off-TDF groups to adjust for associated factors.

RESULTS

After PSM, 180 off-TDF and 60 off-TAF patients were analyzed. The cumulative rates of virological and clinical relapse at 52 weeks were 75.1% and 58.5% respectively in the off-TDF group and 91.1% and 61.6% in the off-TAF group. Patients in the off-TAF group had significantly higher rates of virological relapse than those in the off-TDF group (p = 0.021), but not clinical relapse (p = 0.785). Multivariate cox regression analysis showed that off-TAF group was an independent factor for virological relapse, but not clinical relapse. Severity of clinical relapse and hepatic decompensation rate were comparable between off-TDF and off-TAF groups CONCLUSIONS: The off-TAF group had a higher virological relapse rate than the off-TDF group. The difference in clinical relapse pattern and severity was not clinically important between the two groups.

摘要

背景/目的:停止使用替诺福韦艾拉酚胺(TAF)——一种更集中在肝细胞中的替诺福韦前体药物——的患者的发病率和复发模式尚不清楚。

方法

招募了停止使用富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯(TDF)(停药 TDF)或在停药前 3 个月以上转换为 TAF(停药 TAF)的 HBeAg 阴性 CHB 患者。使用倾向评分匹配法(PSM),在停药 TAF 组与停药 TDF 组之间创建 1:3 的比例,以调整相关因素。

结果

经过 PSM,分析了 180 例停药 TDF 和 60 例停药 TAF 患者。停药 TDF 组和停药 TAF 组在第 52 周时病毒学和临床复发的累积发生率分别为 75.1%和 58.5%以及 91.1%和 61.6%。停药 TAF 组的病毒学复发率明显高于停药 TDF 组(p=0.021),但临床复发率无差异(p=0.785)。多变量 cox 回归分析显示,停药 TAF 组是病毒学复发的独立因素,但不是临床复发的独立因素。停药 TDF 组和停药 TAF 组的临床复发严重程度和肝失代偿率相当。

结论

停药 TAF 组的病毒学复发率高于停药 TDF 组。两组之间的临床复发模式和严重程度的差异在临床上并不重要。

相似文献

1
HBV relapse rates in patients who discontinue tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with or without switching to tenofovir alafenamide.恩替卡韦酯治疗的患者停药或换药(替诺福韦艾拉酚胺)后 HBV 复发率。
Dig Liver Dis. 2023 Jun;55(6):771-777. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.01.154. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
Retreatment Efficacy and Renal Safety of Tenofovir Alafenamide, Entecavir, and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate After Entecavir or Tenofovir Cessation.恩替卡韦或替诺福韦停药后丙酚替诺福韦、恩替卡韦和富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯的再治疗疗效及肾脏安全性
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Feb;68(2):665-675. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07657-8. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
3
96 weeks treatment of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for hepatitis B virus infection.替诺福韦艾拉酚胺与富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯治疗乙型肝炎病毒感染:96 周治疗结果。
J Hepatol. 2018 Apr;68(4):672-681. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.039. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
4
Comparison of Pegylated Interferon Alfa Therapy in Combination with Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate or Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients.聚乙二醇化干扰素α联合富马酸替诺福韦艾拉酚胺或富马酸替诺福韦酯治疗慢性乙型肝炎患者的比较。
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Jun 20;16:3929-3941. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S411183. eCollection 2023.
5
Tenofovir alafenamide treatment may not worsen the lipid profile of chronic hepatitis B patients: A propensity score-matched analysis.替诺福韦艾拉酚胺治疗可能不会恶化慢性乙型肝炎患者的血脂情况:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2022 Apr;28(2):254-264. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2021.0314. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
6
Tenofovir alafenamide for hepatitis B virus infection including switching therapy from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.替诺福韦艾拉酚胺用于治疗乙型肝炎病毒感染,包括从富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯转换治疗。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Nov;34(11):2004-2010. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14686. Epub 2019 May 21.
7
Efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate in preventing HBV vertical transmission of high maternal viral load.富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯和富马酸替诺福韦艾拉酚胺酯预防高病毒载量孕妇母婴垂直传播的疗效和安全性。
Hepatol Int. 2021 Oct;15(5):1103-1108. doi: 10.1007/s12072-021-10235-1. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
8
Hepatitis B relapse after entecavir or tenofovir alafenamide cessation under anti-viral prophylaxis for cancer chemotherapy.癌症化疗抗病毒预防治疗停止后恩替卡韦或替诺福韦艾拉酚胺引起的乙型肝炎复发。
Virol J. 2024 Apr 3;21(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02338-6.
9
Tenofovir Alafenamide for Drug-Resistant Hepatitis B: A Randomized Trial for Switching From Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate.替诺福韦艾拉酚胺治疗耐药性乙型肝炎:从富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯转换的随机试验。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;20(2):427-437.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.04.045. Epub 2021 May 4.
10
Effect of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on hepatocellular carcinoma risk in chronic hepatitis B.替诺福韦艾拉酚胺与富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯对慢性乙型肝炎患者肝细胞癌风险的影响。
J Viral Hepat. 2021 Nov;28(11):1570-1578. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13601. Epub 2021 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics of a BCS Class III Drug with Two Different Study Designs: Tenofovir Alafenamide Monofumarate Film-coated Tablet.两种不同研究设计下 BCS 分类 III 类药物药代动力学评价:替诺福韦艾拉酚胺富马酸单酯薄膜衣片。
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2024 May 30;25(5):123. doi: 10.1208/s12249-024-02835-5.
2
Safety considerations for withdrawal of nucleos(t)ide analogues in patients with chronic hepatitis B: First, do no harm.慢性乙型肝炎患者核苷(酸)类似物停药的安全性考虑:一、不造成伤害。
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023 Oct;29(4):869-890. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0420. Epub 2023 Mar 14.