Sezici Yağmur Lena, Önçağ Mehmet Gökhan
Private practice, Izmir, Turkey.
Private practice, Izmir, Turkey.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Apr;163(4):e106-e114. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.10.021. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
This study aimed to assess and compare the duration and outcomes of orthodontic treatment with conventional and self-ligating lingual fixed appliances with the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) Objective Grading System.
Thirty consecutive patients with a complete dentition and Angle Class I malocclusion treated with a conventional lingual bracket system (STb; Ormco, Glendora, Calif) or self-ligating lingual bracket system (GC Experience-L; GC Orthodontics, Breckerfeld, Germany) were included. The occlusal outcome was assessed with the ABO instrument. The treatment duration and ABO scores of the 2 groups were recorded. Statistical analyses were evaluated using independent-sample t tests.
The conventional group had a mean treatment time of 2.10 ± 0.69 years, and the self-ligating group had a treatment duration of 1.68 ± 0.48 years (P >0.05). The mean posttreatment ABO scores in the conventional group were 20.23 ± 5.13, and the mean posttreatment ABO scores in the self-ligating group were 21.00 ± 5.66. No difference was found between the groups regarding the criteria of ABO (P >0.05). The highest scores were given in the assessment of buccolingual inclinations in both conventional and self-ligating lingual bracket groups.
The design of the lingual appliances used in this study did not influence the treatment duration and the total ABO scores in treating patients with a Class I relationship in this sample. Both types of lingual brackets were especially deficient in correcting buccolingual inclinations. The strengths were their ability to close spaces and correct anterior rotations and overjet regardless of the bracket types.
本研究旨在使用美国正畸委员会(ABO)客观评分系统评估和比较使用传统和自结扎舌侧固定矫治器进行正畸治疗的疗程和结果。
纳入30例连续的全牙列且安氏I类错牙合患者,分别使用传统舌侧托槽系统(STb;奥美科公司,美国加利福尼亚州格伦多拉)或自结扎舌侧托槽系统(GC Experience-L;德国布雷克费尔德GC正畸公司)进行治疗。使用ABO器械评估咬合结果。记录两组的治疗疗程和ABO评分。采用独立样本t检验进行统计学分析。
传统组的平均治疗时间为2.10±0.69年,自结扎组的治疗疗程为1.68±0.48年(P>0.05)。传统组治疗后的平均ABO评分为20.23±5.13,自结扎组治疗后的平均ABO评分为21.00±5.66。两组在ABO标准方面无差异(P>0.05)。在传统和自结扎舌侧托槽组中,颊舌向倾斜度评估得分最高。
本研究中使用的舌侧矫治器设计在治疗该样本中I类关系患者时,对治疗疗程和ABO总分没有影响。两种类型的舌侧托槽在纠正颊舌向倾斜度方面尤其不足。其优势在于无论托槽类型如何,都有关闭间隙、纠正前牙旋转和覆盖的能力。