• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

I类不拔牙患者传统与自锁舌侧正畸治疗效果:与美国正畸委员会客观评分系统的比较研究

Conventional and self-ligating lingual orthodontic treatment outcomes in Class I nonextraction patients: A comparative study with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System.

作者信息

Sezici Yağmur Lena, Önçağ Mehmet Gökhan

机构信息

Private practice, Izmir, Turkey.

Private practice, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Apr;163(4):e106-e114. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.10.021. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.10.021
PMID:36737396
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to assess and compare the duration and outcomes of orthodontic treatment with conventional and self-ligating lingual fixed appliances with the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) Objective Grading System.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients with a complete dentition and Angle Class I malocclusion treated with a conventional lingual bracket system (STb; Ormco, Glendora, Calif) or self-ligating lingual bracket system (GC Experience-L; GC Orthodontics, Breckerfeld, Germany) were included. The occlusal outcome was assessed with the ABO instrument. The treatment duration and ABO scores of the 2 groups were recorded. Statistical analyses were evaluated using independent-sample t tests.

RESULTS

The conventional group had a mean treatment time of 2.10 ± 0.69 years, and the self-ligating group had a treatment duration of 1.68 ± 0.48 years (P >0.05). The mean posttreatment ABO scores in the conventional group were 20.23 ± 5.13, and the mean posttreatment ABO scores in the self-ligating group were 21.00 ± 5.66. No difference was found between the groups regarding the criteria of ABO (P >0.05). The highest scores were given in the assessment of buccolingual inclinations in both conventional and self-ligating lingual bracket groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The design of the lingual appliances used in this study did not influence the treatment duration and the total ABO scores in treating patients with a Class I relationship in this sample. Both types of lingual brackets were especially deficient in correcting buccolingual inclinations. The strengths were their ability to close spaces and correct anterior rotations and overjet regardless of the bracket types.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在使用美国正畸委员会(ABO)客观评分系统评估和比较使用传统和自结扎舌侧固定矫治器进行正畸治疗的疗程和结果。

方法

纳入30例连续的全牙列且安氏I类错牙合患者,分别使用传统舌侧托槽系统(STb;奥美科公司,美国加利福尼亚州格伦多拉)或自结扎舌侧托槽系统(GC Experience-L;德国布雷克费尔德GC正畸公司)进行治疗。使用ABO器械评估咬合结果。记录两组的治疗疗程和ABO评分。采用独立样本t检验进行统计学分析。

结果

传统组的平均治疗时间为2.10±0.69年,自结扎组的治疗疗程为1.68±0.48年(P>0.05)。传统组治疗后的平均ABO评分为20.23±5.13,自结扎组治疗后的平均ABO评分为21.00±5.66。两组在ABO标准方面无差异(P>0.05)。在传统和自结扎舌侧托槽组中,颊舌向倾斜度评估得分最高。

结论

本研究中使用的舌侧矫治器设计在治疗该样本中I类关系患者时,对治疗疗程和ABO总分没有影响。两种类型的舌侧托槽在纠正颊舌向倾斜度方面尤其不足。其优势在于无论托槽类型如何,都有关闭间隙、纠正前牙旋转和覆盖的能力。

相似文献

1
Conventional and self-ligating lingual orthodontic treatment outcomes in Class I nonextraction patients: A comparative study with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System.I类不拔牙患者传统与自锁舌侧正畸治疗效果:与美国正畸委员会客观评分系统的比较研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Apr;163(4):e106-e114. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.10.021. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
The Herbst appliance combined with a completely customized lingual appliance: A retrospective cohort study of clinical outcomes using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System. Herbst 矫治器联合完全定制的舌侧矫治器:使用美国正畸协会客观分级系统评估临床结果的回顾性队列研究。
Int Orthod. 2020 Dec;18(4):732-738. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
3
Comparison of the force levels among labial and lingual self-ligating and conventional brackets in simulated misaligned teeth.模拟牙齿不齐情况下唇侧和舌侧自锁托槽与传统托槽之间力水平的比较。
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Aug 1;39(4):419-425. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw082.
4
Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.舌侧托槽与唇侧托槽牙齿排齐效果的比较:一项体外研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2018 Nov 30;40(6):660-665. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy005.
5
Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects.自锁托槽与传统托槽治疗下颌牙列拥挤的比较:一项关于治疗时间和牙齿效果的前瞻性临床试验
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Aug;132(2):208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.030.
6
Quality of occlusal outcome in adult Class II patients treated with completely customized lingual appliances and Class II elastics compared to adult Class I patients.比较成人安氏 II 类患者使用完全定制舌侧矫治器和安氏 II 类橡皮圈与成人安氏 I 类患者的咬合结果的质量。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Oct 1;46(5). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae031.
7
Frictional Forces of Three Types of Lingual Appliance with Self-ligating Mechanisms.三种自锁式舌侧矫治器的摩擦力研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Jun 1;22(6):605-609.
8
Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.青少年主动自锁式与被动自锁式矫治器和传统矫治器的排齐效率和间隙关闭比较:一项单中心随机对照试验。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 May;145(5):569-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.024.
9
Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material.传统托槽与自锁托槽的治疗效率:弓丝尺寸和材料的影响
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Mar;131(3):395-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.018.
10
Forces exerted by conventional and self-ligating brackets during simulated first- and second-order corrections.在模拟一阶和二阶矫治过程中,传统托槽和自锁托槽施加的力。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 May;133(5):738-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Chair-Time During Polishing with Different Burs and Drills After Cement Customized Brackets Bonding: An In Vitro Comparative Study.定制粘结水门汀托槽后使用不同车针和钻头抛光时的椅旁操作时间:一项体外对比研究
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jul 28;13(8):347. doi: 10.3390/dj13080347.
2
Comparison of Upper Central Incisor Torque in the ClinCheck with and without CBCT Integration: A Cross-Sectional Study.ClinCheck中有无CBCT整合情况下上颌中切牙扭矩的比较:一项横断面研究
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Aug 20;12(8):269. doi: 10.3390/dj12080269.
3
Evidence of Effectiveness of Lingual Orthodontics as an Alternative to Conventional Labial Orthodontics. A Systematic Review.
舌侧正畸作为传统唇侧正畸替代方法的有效性证据。一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 4;16(1):e51643. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51643. eCollection 2024 Jan.