Suppr超能文献

猴子不会通过个体选择表现出对玩具偏好的性别差异。

Monkeys do not show sex differences in toy preferences through their individual choices.

机构信息

Neuroscience and Behavior Unit, California National Primate Research Center, University of California, County Road 98 at Hutchison Drive, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, USA.

出版信息

Biol Sex Differ. 2023 Feb 3;14(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13293-023-00489-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As interest in evaluating sex differences in nonhuman animals grows, the finding that male and female monkeys have toy preferences that differ, and that parallel those documented in human children, has garnered significant attention and is leveraged as an argument in favor of a biological contribution for human sex differences. To date, however, only two studies have investigated sex differences in monkeys' toy preferences, both documenting that males prefer toys considered to be "masculine" (such as vehicles) and females prefer toys considered to be "feminine" (such as dolls). Monkeys in these studies were tested in their social groups, making it hard to determine if the sex differences reported reflect actual individual preferences or result from social dynamics present at the time of testing.

METHOD

Here, we assessed the preferences of 14 rhesus macaques (N = 7 males; N = 7 females) who were singly tested in a choice test with a variety of toys characterized as masculine (hard non-zoomorphic wheeled toys), feminine (zoomorphic soft toys), neutral (hard non-zoomorphic toys) and ambiguous (zoomorphic or plush vehicles) based on criteria from previous studies.

RESULTS

Males and females showed similar preferences for neutral and "masculine" toys and preferred them (i.e., were more likely to interact with them) to "feminine" and sex-ambiguous toys. When they interacted with the toys, both males and females interacted more with neutral than with "masculine" toys. Females, but not males, interacted more with neutral and "masculine" toys than with "feminine" toys. The highest frequency of interaction for any single toy for the male monkeys was with the doll-standing is stark contrast to previous findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results contrast greatly with the previous study in rhesus monkeys, as well as findings in human children, suggesting that the previously documented sex differences are likely context dependent, and question the existence of a strong biological basis to sex differences in toy preferences.

摘要

背景

随着人们对评估非人类动物性别差异的兴趣日益浓厚,发现雄性和雌性猴子对玩具的偏好存在差异,并且与人类儿童中记录的差异相似,这引起了广泛关注,并被用作支持人类性别差异存在生物学基础的论据。然而,迄今为止,只有两项研究调查了猴子对玩具偏好的性别差异,这两项研究都记录了雄性更喜欢被认为是“男性化”的玩具(如车辆),而雌性更喜欢被认为是“女性化”的玩具(如娃娃)。在这些研究中,猴子是在其社交群体中进行测试的,因此很难确定报告的性别差异是否反映了实际的个体偏好,还是由于测试时存在的社会动态所致。

方法

在这里,我们评估了 14 只恒河猴(N=7 只雄性;N=7 只雌性)的偏好,这些猴子在一项选择测试中单独接受测试,该测试使用了各种玩具,这些玩具根据之前的研究标准被分为男性化(硬非动物形轮式玩具)、女性化(动物形软玩具)、中性(硬非动物形玩具)和模糊(动物形或毛绒车辆)。

结果

雄性和雌性对中性和“男性化”玩具表现出相似的偏好,并且更喜欢这些玩具(即更有可能与这些玩具互动)而不是“女性化”和性别模糊的玩具。当它们与玩具互动时,雄性和雌性与中性玩具的互动都比与“男性化”玩具的互动更多。雌性与中性和“男性化”玩具的互动多于“女性化”玩具,而雄性则不然。雄性猴子对任何单个玩具的最高互动频率都是与娃娃站立形成鲜明对比,这与之前的发现形成鲜明对比。

结论

我们的结果与之前在恒河猴以及人类儿童中的研究结果大相径庭,这表明之前记录的性别差异可能是上下文相关的,并质疑玩具偏好中存在强烈的生物学基础的存在。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8985/9898904/7c1284d7aecb/13293_2023_489_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验