Economic Policy Studies, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug;58(4):948-952. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14139. Epub 2023 Feb 19.
To compare the Medicare Part D market share of brand drugs with their net-to-list price ratio.
SSR Health Brand Net Price Tool and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2007-2019.
For each drug, we calculated the ratio of net to list price and the percent of users that were Medicare-eligible. We compared these cross-sectionally in each year and estimated a difference-in-differences model comparing drugs with high or low Medicare market shares (MMS) after following changes to program incentives in 2010.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The sample included brand drugs without generic competitors appearing in both datasets.
Net-to-list price ratios were negatively correlated with MMS in the later years of our sample. In 2019, a 10% increase in MMS was associated with a significant 4.6% [95% CI: 2.1%, 7.1%] decrease in net-to-list ratio. Difference-in-differences showed net-to-list price ratios of drugs with above median MMS fell relative to those with below median MMS. By 2019, we observe an absolute reduction of -0.2 [95% CI: -0.29, -0.11], representing 28% reduction relative to the average ratio in 2010.
Greater exposure to the Medicare Part D market was associated with larger differences between net and list prices of drugs.
比较品牌药物在医疗保险部分 D 市场中的份额与其净标价比。
SSR 健康品牌净价工具和医疗支出面板调查,2007-2019 年。
对于每种药物,我们计算了净标价比和符合医疗保险条件的用户比例。我们在每年进行了横断面比较,并在 2010 年对计划激励措施进行了更改后,使用差异中的差异模型比较了高或低医疗保险市场份额(MMS)的药物。
数据收集/提取方法:样本包括在两个数据集均无仿制药竞争的品牌药物。
在我们样本的后期,净标价比与 MMS 呈负相关。在 2019 年,MMS 增加 10%,与净标价比显著下降 4.6%[95%置信区间:2.1%,7.1%]相关。差异中的差异表明,MMS 中位数以上的药物的净标价比相对于 MMS 中位数以下的药物有所下降。到 2019 年,我们观察到绝对值下降了-0.2[95%置信区间:-0.29,-0.11],与 2010 年的平均比值相比,降幅为 28%。
更多地接触医疗保险部分 D 市场与药物的净标价与标价之间的差异更大有关。