Suppr超能文献

医疗保险部分 D 对品牌药定价的影响。

The influence of Medicare Part D on the list pricing of brand drugs.

机构信息

Economic Policy Studies, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug;58(4):948-952. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14139. Epub 2023 Feb 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the Medicare Part D market share of brand drugs with their net-to-list price ratio.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

SSR Health Brand Net Price Tool and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2007-2019.

STUDY DESIGN

For each drug, we calculated the ratio of net to list price and the percent of users that were Medicare-eligible. We compared these cross-sectionally in each year and estimated a difference-in-differences model comparing drugs with high or low Medicare market shares (MMS) after following changes to program incentives in 2010.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The sample included brand drugs without generic competitors appearing in both datasets.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Net-to-list price ratios were negatively correlated with MMS in the later years of our sample. In 2019, a 10% increase in MMS was associated with a significant 4.6% [95% CI: 2.1%, 7.1%] decrease in net-to-list ratio. Difference-in-differences showed net-to-list price ratios of drugs with above median MMS fell relative to those with below median MMS. By 2019, we observe an absolute reduction of -0.2 [95% CI: -0.29, -0.11], representing 28% reduction relative to the average ratio in 2010.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater exposure to the Medicare Part D market was associated with larger differences between net and list prices of drugs.

摘要

目的

比较品牌药物在医疗保险部分 D 市场中的份额与其净标价比。

数据来源和研究设置

SSR 健康品牌净价工具和医疗支出面板调查,2007-2019 年。

研究设计

对于每种药物,我们计算了净标价比和符合医疗保险条件的用户比例。我们在每年进行了横断面比较,并在 2010 年对计划激励措施进行了更改后,使用差异中的差异模型比较了高或低医疗保险市场份额(MMS)的药物。

数据收集/提取方法:样本包括在两个数据集均无仿制药竞争的品牌药物。

主要发现

在我们样本的后期,净标价比与 MMS 呈负相关。在 2019 年,MMS 增加 10%,与净标价比显著下降 4.6%[95%置信区间:2.1%,7.1%]相关。差异中的差异表明,MMS 中位数以上的药物的净标价比相对于 MMS 中位数以下的药物有所下降。到 2019 年,我们观察到绝对值下降了-0.2[95%置信区间:-0.29,-0.11],与 2010 年的平均比值相比,降幅为 28%。

结论

更多地接触医疗保险部分 D 市场与药物的净标价与标价之间的差异更大有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dbc/10315368/ad0137ac69c9/HESR-58-948-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验