Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Jun 2;4(6):e231317. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1317.
Measuring drug price inflation is challenging because new drugs continually enter the market, some drugs transition from branded to generic, and current inflation indexes do not account for these market basket changes. Instead, they measure the price increases after new drugs have been launched. Therefore, the public pays the higher costs of newer and usually more expensive drugs, but the inflation indexes do not reflect the increases over existing drugs previously used to treat the same conditions.
To assess how price index methods can affect estimates of drug price inflation using a case study of hepatitis C virus (HCV) medication and to explore other approaches for constructing a price index.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used data from outpatient pharmacies to compile a list of all HCV medications that were ever on the market (brand and generic) from 2013 to 2020. Using National Drug Codes of HCV drugs, a 20% nationally representative sample of Medicare Part D claims from 2013 to 2020 was queried. Alternative drug price indexes, including product-level vs class-level product and quantity definitions were developed in which gross vs net price definitions were used and an adjustment was created and applied to capture treatment duration because newer drugs often required a shorter duration.
Price index value and rate of inflation from 2013 to 2020 for each methodologic approach to constructing a drug pricing index.
In all, 27 different HCV drug regimens were identified in Medicare Part D claims in 2013 to 2020. A product-level approach for measuring inflation estimated a 10% gross drug price increase from 2013 to 2020 for HCV drugs, whereas a class-level approach including the higher prices of the new drugs showed a 31% gross price increase. After adjusting for manufacturer rebates to estimate net prices, the findings showed that HCV drug prices fell by 31% from 2013 to 2020.
The findings of this cross-sectional study indicate that the current product-level methods to estimate drug price inflation underestimated price increases for HCV drugs by failing to include the high launch prices of new market entrants. Using a class-level approach, the index captured higher spending on new products at launch. Prescription-level analyses, which did not consider shorter durations of treatment, overestimated price increases.
衡量药品价格通胀具有挑战性,因为新药不断进入市场,一些药品从品牌药转为仿制药,而当前的通胀指数并未考虑这些市场篮子的变化。相反,它们衡量的是新药推出后的价格上涨。因此,公众承担了更新、通常更昂贵的药物的更高成本,但通胀指数并没有反映出以前用于治疗相同疾病的现有药物的涨幅。
以丙型肝炎病毒 (HCV) 药物为例,评估药品价格通胀指数方法如何影响估计结果,并探讨构建价格指数的其他方法。
设计、设置和参与者:这项横断面研究使用了来自门诊药房的数据,编制了 2013 年至 2020 年所有上市(品牌和仿制药)HCV 药物的清单。使用 HCV 药物的国家药品代码,对 2013 年至 2020 年 20%的全国代表性医疗保险部分 D 索赔进行了查询。开发了替代药品价格指数,包括产品级别与类别级别产品和数量定义,其中使用了毛额与净额价格定义,并创建了一个调整项以捕捉治疗持续时间,因为新药通常需要更短的持续时间。
每种构建药品定价指数的方法从 2013 年到 2020 年的价格指数值和通胀率。
在医疗保险部分 D 索赔中,2013 年至 2020 年共确定了 27 种不同的 HCV 药物方案。采用产品级别方法衡量通胀,估计 HCV 药物的毛药价从 2013 年到 2020 年增长了 10%,而包括新进入者较高价格的类别级别方法则显示毛药价增长了 31%。在调整制造商回扣以估计净价后,研究结果表明,2013 年至 2020 年 HCV 药物价格下降了 31%。
这项横断面研究的结果表明,目前用于估计药品价格通胀的产品级别方法低估了 HCV 药物的价格涨幅,因为它们没有包括新产品进入市场的高价。采用类别级别方法,该指数捕捉到新产品上市时的较高支出。不考虑较短治疗持续时间的处方级别分析高估了价格涨幅。