Suppr超能文献

应用冷盐水灌注消融导管行房室结折返性心动过速的导管消融。

Catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with an irrigated contact-force sensing radiofrequency ablation catheter.

机构信息

Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York University Langone Health. New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Apr;34(4):942-946. doi: 10.1111/jce.15849. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) slow pathway modification for catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is traditionally performed using a 4-mm nonirrigated (NI) RF ablation catheter. Slow pathway modification using irrigated, contact-force sensing (ICFS) RFA catheters has been described in case reports, but the outcomes have not been systematically evaluated.

METHODS

Acute procedural outcomes of 200 consecutive patients undergoing slow pathway modification for AVNRT were analyzed. A 3.5-mm ICFS RFA catheter (ThermoCool SmartTouch STSF, Biosense Webster, Inc.) was utilized in 134 patients, and a 4-mm NI RFA catheter (EZ Steer, Biosense Webster, Inc.) was utilized in 66 patients. Electroanatomic maps were retrospectively analyzed in a blinded fashion to determine the proximity of ablation lesions to the His region.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of patients in both groups were similar. Total RF time was significantly lower in the ICFS group compared to the NI group (5.53 ± 4.6 vs. 6.24 ± 4.9 min, p = 0.03). Median procedure time was similar in both groups (ICFS, 108.0 (87.5-131.5) min vs. NI, 100.0 (85.0-125.0) min; p = 0.2). Ablation was required in closer proximity to the His region in the NI group compared to the ICFS group (14.4 ± 5.9 vs. 16.7 ± 6.4 mm, respectively, p = 0.01). AVNRT was rendered noninducible in all patients, and there was no arrhythmia recurrence during follow-up in both groups. Catheter ablation was complicated by AV block in one patient in the NI group.

CONCLUSION

Slow pathway modification for catheter ablation of AVNRT using an ICFS RFA catheter is feasible, safe, and may facilitate shorter duration ablation while avoiding ablation in close proximity to the His region.

摘要

简介

射频消融(RFA)慢径改良术是治疗房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)的导管消融方法,传统上使用 4mm 非灌流(NI)射频消融导管。使用灌流、接触力感应(ICFS)RFA 导管进行慢径改良术已在病例报告中描述,但尚未对其结果进行系统评估。

方法

分析了 200 例连续接受 AVNRT 慢径改良术的患者的急性手术结果。134 例患者使用 3.5mm ICFS RFA 导管(ThermoCool SmartTouch STSF,Biosense Webster,Inc.),66 例患者使用 4mm NI RFA 导管(EZ Steer,Biosense Webster,Inc.)。采用盲法对电解剖图谱进行回顾性分析,以确定消融病灶与希氏束区的接近程度。

结果

两组患者的基线特征相似。ICFS 组的总 RF 时间明显低于 NI 组(5.53±4.6 分钟比 6.24±4.9 分钟,p=0.03)。两组的中位手术时间相似(ICFS,108.0(87.5-131.5)分钟比 NI,100.0(85.0-125.0)分钟;p=0.2)。与 ICFS 组相比,NI 组的消融更接近希氏束区(14.4±5.9 毫米比 16.7±6.4 毫米,p=0.01)。所有患者均实现 AVNRT 不可诱导,两组均无心律失常复发。NI 组 1 例患者出现房室传导阻滞。

结论

使用 ICFS RFA 导管行 AVNRT 导管消融的慢径改良术是可行、安全的,可能缩短消融时间,同时避免在希氏束区附近消融。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验