Yu W C, Chen S A, Tai C T, Chiang C E, Lee S H, Chiou C W, Ueng K C, Wen Z C, Chen Y J, Huang J L, Feng A N, Chang M S
Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1997 Feb;59(2):71-7.
Although selective radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathway has provided a curative therapy for patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, information about the long-term result of radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was not available. This study was to investigate the long-term effect of selective slow pathway ablation in a large group of consecutive patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.
From December 1990 to June 1996, 760 consecutive patients with clinically documented AV nodal reentrant tachycardia received radiofrequency catheter ablation of antegrade and/or retrograde slow AV nodal pathway at this electrophysiologic laboratory. The data of electrophysiologic characteristics and long-term follow-up were collected. The success rate, complication rate and recurrence rate were analyzed.
There were 669 slow-fast form AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, 27 fast-slow form AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, 13 variant form AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, and 51 multiple forms of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The electrophysiologic characteristics were different among these four groups. However, radiofrequency catheter ablation attained a 99% success rate in all the four groups with different types of tachycardia. There were 5 accidental injuries to AV conduction. Three of the 5 patients needed implantation of pacemakers. During the follow-up period, there were 14 (1.8%) recurrence of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. All of the 14 patients had a successful second ablation without recurrence.
This study demonstrated that radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow pathway was a highly effective treatment modality for patients with various types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Furthermore, the incidence of complication rate and recurrence rate were low in an experienced center.
尽管选择性射频导管消融慢房室结通路已为房室结折返性心动过速患者提供了一种治愈性疗法,但关于不同类型房室结折返性心动过速患者射频导管消融的长期结果的信息尚不可得。本研究旨在调查一大组连续性房室结折返性心动过速患者中选择性慢径路消融的长期效果。
1990年12月至1996年6月,760例临床记录有房室结折返性心动过速的连续性患者在本电生理实验室接受了顺行和/或逆行慢房室结通路的射频导管消融。收集电生理特征和长期随访数据。分析成功率、并发症发生率和复发率。
有669例慢快型房室结折返性心动过速、27例快慢型房室结折返性心动过速、13例变异型房室结折返性心动过速和51例多型房室结折返性心动过速。这四组的电生理特征不同。然而,射频导管消融在所有四种不同类型心动过速的组中成功率均达到99%。有5例发生房室传导意外损伤。5例患者中有3例需要植入起搏器。在随访期间,有14例(1.8%)房室结折返性心动过速复发。所有14例患者第二次消融成功且无复发。
本研究表明,射频导管消融慢径路对各种类型房室结折返性心动过速患者是一种高效的治疗方式。此外,在经验丰富的中心,并发症发生率和复发率较低。