• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估使用不同品牌 Mueller-Hinton 琼脂对头孢地尔进行纸片扩散试验解释的变异性。

Evaluation of Variability in Interpretation of Disk Diffusion Testing for Cefiderocol Using Different Brands of Mueller-Hinton Agar.

机构信息

Department of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Lab Med. 2023 May 4;8(3):523-534. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfac131.

DOI:10.1093/jalm/jfac131
PMID:36738243
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cefiderocol is a new antibiotic used to treat infections with antibiotic resistant Gram-negative bacilli. The impact of differences between Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) brands on susceptibility testing is underexplored. Compounding the implementation of cefiderocol susceptibility testing is a lack of harmonization between different regulatory body breakpoint criteria.

METHODS

We performed Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion using BD, Hardy, and Remel MHA, in addition to broth microdilution for Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 25), Enterobacterales (n = 25), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 24), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 23). We analyzed disk diffusion diameters and minimum inhibitory concentrations using interpretive criteria from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST).

RESULTS

Breakpoint criteria impacted interpretation of susceptibly testing results, for example with the broth microdilution we found 8% (2/25) of A. baumannii isolates change interpretation between CLSI and EUCAST and 32% (8/25) change between CLSI and FDA, 12% (3/25) of Enterobacterales change between CLSI and EUCAST, 13% (3/23) of P. aeruginosa interpretations change between CLSI and FDA, and 4% (1/25) S. maltophilia change between CLSI and FDA. There was a significant difference between the zone disk diffusion diameters for P. aeruginosa and S. maltophilia between Hardy and BD; which changed interpretation (using CLSI criteria) for 8.7% (2/23) for P. aeruginosa but 0% (0/24) for S. maltophilia.

CONCLUSIONS

Breakpoint criteria impact cefiderocol susceptibility testing interpretation for broth microdilution and disk diffusion. Choice of MHA brand can also affect result interpretation.

摘要

背景

头孢地尔是一种新型抗生素,用于治疗对耐抗生素革兰氏阴性杆菌的感染。不同 Mueller-Hinton 琼脂 (MHA) 品牌之间对药敏试验的影响尚未得到充分探索。使头孢地尔药敏试验实施复杂化的是,不同监管机构的折点标准之间缺乏协调。

方法

我们使用 BD、Hardy 和 Remel MHA 进行了 Kirby-Bauer 圆盘扩散,此外还进行了肉汤微量稀释,用于鲍曼不动杆菌(n = 25)、肠杆菌科(n = 25)、嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌(n = 24)和铜绿假单胞菌(n = 23)。我们使用来自临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)、美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)和欧洲抗菌药物敏感性测试委员会(EUCAST)的解释标准分析了圆盘扩散直径和最小抑菌浓度。

结果

折点标准影响药敏试验结果的解释,例如,我们发现通过肉汤微量稀释,CLSI 和 EUCAST 之间有 8%(2/25)的鲍曼不动杆菌分离株改变了药敏试验的解释,CLSI 和 FDA 之间有 32%(8/25)改变,CLSI 和 EUCAST 之间有 12%(3/25)的肠杆菌科改变,CLSI 和 FDA 之间有 13%(3/23)的铜绿假单胞菌解释改变,CLSI 和 FDA 之间有 4%(1/25)的嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌改变。Hardy 和 BD 之间铜绿假单胞菌和嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌的圆盘扩散直径存在显著差异;根据 CLSI 标准,这改变了 8.7%(2/23)的铜绿假单胞菌的解释,但嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌没有改变(0/24)。

结论

折点标准影响肉汤微量稀释和圆盘扩散的头孢地尔药敏试验解释。MHA 品牌的选择也会影响结果的解释。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Variability in Interpretation of Disk Diffusion Testing for Cefiderocol Using Different Brands of Mueller-Hinton Agar.评估使用不同品牌 Mueller-Hinton 琼脂对头孢地尔进行纸片扩散试验解释的变异性。
J Appl Lab Med. 2023 May 4;8(3):523-534. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfac131.
2
Cefiderocol Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Considerations: the Achilles' Heel of the Trojan Horse?头孢地尔抗菌药物敏感性试验的考量:特洛伊木马的阿喀琉斯之踵?
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Dec 17;59(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00951-20.
3
Activity of Cefiderocol against U.S. and European Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates Collected in 2020 as Part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program.头孢地尔在 2020 年 SENTRY 抗菌监测计划中对美国和欧洲革兰氏阴性临床分离株的活性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0271221. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02712-21. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
4
Cefiderocol Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: a Comparison of Disk Diffusion to Broth Microdilution.头孢地尔对多重耐药革兰氏阴性杆菌的药敏试验:纸片扩散法与肉汤微量稀释法的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Dec 17;59(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01649-20.
5
Global prevalence of cefiderocol non-susceptibility in Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全球肠杆菌科、铜绿假单胞菌、鲍曼不动杆菌和嗜麦芽寡养单胞菌对头孢地尔罗耐药的流行情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024 Feb;30(2):178-188. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.08.029. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
6
Cefiderocol: EUCAST criteria for disc diffusion and broth microdilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.头孢地尔克罗:药敏试验用纸片扩散法和肉汤微量稀释法的 EUCAST 标准
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 May 29;77(6):1662-1669. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac080.
7
Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Pathogens to Cefiderocol in Five Consecutive Annual Multinational SIDERO-WT Surveillance Studies, 2014 to 2019.2014 年至 2019 年连续五年跨国 SIDERO-WT 监测研究中革兰氏阴性病原体对头孢地尔的敏感性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Feb 15;66(2):e0199021. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01990-21. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
8
Multicenter Evaluation of the New Etest Gradient Diffusion Method for Piperacillin-Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing of , , and Complex.多中心评估新 Etest 梯度扩散法检测产 ESBL 肠杆菌科细菌对哌拉西林-他唑巴坦药敏试验的准确性
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jan 28;58(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01042-19.
9
Performance evaluation of Bruker UMIC microdilution panel and disc diffusion to determine cefiderocol susceptibility in Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Burkolderia species.布鲁克UMIC 微量稀释板和纸片扩散法评估头孢地尔罗在肠杆菌科、鲍曼不动杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌、嗜麦芽寡养单胞菌、木糖氧化无色杆菌和伯克霍尔德菌属中的药敏性能。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Mar;43(3):559-566. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04745-7. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
10
Cation concentration variability of four distinct Mueller-Hinton agar brands influences polymyxin B susceptibility results.四种不同 Mueller-Hinton 琼脂品牌的阳离子浓度变异性影响多粘菌素 B 药敏试验结果。
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Jul;50(7):2414-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06686-11. Epub 2012 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cefiderocol Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing by Disk Diffusion: Influence of Agar Media and Inhibition Zone Morphology in Metallo-β-lactamase.采用纸片扩散法进行头孢地尔抗菌药物敏感性试验:琼脂培养基及金属β-内酰胺酶中抑菌圈形态的影响
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 May 21;14(5):527. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14050527.
2
Impact of media brand on cefiderocol disk diffusion results.媒体品牌对头孢地尔纸片扩散结果的影响。
J Clin Microbiol. 2025 May 14;63(5):e0164824. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01648-24. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
3
Issues with Cefiderocol Testing: Comparing Commercial Methods to Broth Microdilution in Iron-Depleted Medium-Analyses of the Performances, ATU, and Trailing Effect According to EUCAST Initial and Revised Interpretation Criteria.
头孢地尔检测的问题:在缺铁培养基中比较商业方法与肉汤微量稀释法——根据欧洲药敏试验委员会初始和修订的解释标准对性能、抗菌单位和拖尾效应的分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 18;14(20):2318. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14202318.
4
Commercially available tests for determining cefiderocol susceptibility display variable performance in the Achromobacter genus.市售的用于检测头孢地尔罗酯药敏性的检测方法在不动杆菌属中表现出不同的性能。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2024 Aug 22;23(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12941-024-00731-1.