DeMarco M G, Field A M, Donohue L E, Cox H L, Kidd T S, Barry K E, Mathers A J
Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2025 May 14;63(5):e0164824. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01648-24. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin that utilizes iron transport systems to cross cell membranes. This unique strategy complicates antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) due to variable iron content in media. While guidance for using iron-depleted media exists for broth microdilution (BMD), disk diffusion (DD) with commercial media is a common AST method in the clinical laboratory. We investigated cefiderocol DD result variability using multiple Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) brands. DD results using Remel (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Diego, CA), Hardy (Hardy Diagnostics, Springboro, OH), and BBL (Becton Dickinson, East Rutherford, NJ) MHA were compared to those of BMD using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth. BMD reproducibility, BMD trailing endpoints, and DD intra- and inter-brand variability in zones of inhibition were investigated. Forty-seven multidrug-resistant clinical isolates and three Antibiotic Resistance Bank isolates composed of , carbapenemase (CP-) and non-carbapenemase-producing (non-CP-) carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), complex, , and complex were tested. Categorical agreement (CA) ≥ 90% was only demonstrated using CLSI breakpoints with BBL agar. Intra- and inter-brand variability in DD were highest for and CRE, with 25% (5/20) and 16.7% (3/18) exhibiting discrepant AST interpretations, respectively. Isolates not susceptible to cefiderocol via BMD were commonly associated with AST interpretation errors and lower CA. Using commercial MHA for DD resulted in frequent AST interpretation discrepancies, particularly for isolates that were not susceptible to cefiderocol by BMD. Methods and quality control may need to be revisited to ensure the reliability of DD for cefiderocol AST.
The novel mechanism of action of cefiderocol overcomes a variety of resistance mechanisms associated with gram-negative bacteria and positions the agent as an attractive option for treating infections involving multidrug-resistant pathogens. The availability of accurate, timely antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for cefiderocol in clinical microbiology laboratories is critical as cefiderocol-resistant isolates have been described and may contribute to treatment failure. Iron-depleted broth microdilution testing may not be feasible for use in many clinical laboratories. While disk diffusion is an appealing, practical method to implement, our data demonstrate reproducibility issues across agar brands, most notably for organisms that do not test susceptible to cefiderocol when using broth microdilution. Discrepancy errors and misclassifications of resistant isolates as susceptible, and susceptible isolates as resistant, may mislead clinicians and compromise the treatment efficacy. More work is needed to standardize practical yet reproducible methods for cefiderocol antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
头孢地尔是一种利用铁转运系统穿过细胞膜的铁载体头孢菌素。由于培养基中铁含量可变,这种独特的策略使抗菌药物敏感性试验(AST)变得复杂。虽然存在关于使用缺铁培养基进行肉汤微量稀释(BMD)的指南,但在临床实验室中,使用商业培养基进行纸片扩散法(DD)是一种常见的AST方法。我们使用多个品牌的穆勒-欣顿琼脂(MHA)研究了头孢地尔DD结果的变异性。将使用雷米尔(赛默飞世尔科技,加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥)、哈迪(哈迪诊断公司,俄亥俄州斯普林博罗)和BBL(贝克顿·迪金森公司,新泽西州东卢瑟福)MHA的DD结果与使用缺铁阳离子调整穆勒-欣顿肉汤的BMD结果进行比较。研究了BMD的可重复性、BMD拖尾终点以及DD在抑菌圈中的品牌内和品牌间变异性。对47株多重耐药临床分离株和3株由碳青霉烯酶(CP-)和非碳青霉烯酶产生(非CP-)的耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌(CRE)、铜绿假单胞菌复合体、鲍曼不动杆菌复合体组成的抗生素耐药库分离株进行了测试。仅在使用CLSI标准判定值和BBL琼脂时,分类一致性(CA)≥90%。DD的品牌内和品牌间变异性在铜绿假单胞菌和CRE中最高,分别有25%(5/20)和16.7%(3/18)表现出AST解释不一致。通过BMD对头孢地尔不敏感的分离株通常与AST解释错误和较低的CA相关。使用商业MHA进行DD导致频繁的AST解释差异,特别是对于通过BMD对头孢地尔不敏感的分离株。可能需要重新审视方法和质量控制,以确保DD用于头孢地尔AST的可靠性。
头孢地尔的新作用机制克服了多种与革兰氏阴性菌相关的耐药机制,并使该药物成为治疗涉及多重耐药病原体感染的有吸引力的选择。随着头孢地尔耐药分离株的出现并可能导致治疗失败,临床微生物实验室中获得准确、及时的头孢地尔抗菌药物敏感性试验方法至关重要。缺铁肉汤微量稀释试验在许多临床实验室中可能不可行。虽然纸片扩散法是一种有吸引力、实用的实施方法,但我们的数据表明不同琼脂品牌间存在可重复性问题,最明显的是对于使用肉汤微量稀释法检测对头孢地尔不敏感的微生物。耐药分离株的差异错误和错误分类为敏感,以及敏感分离株错误分类为耐药,可能会误导临床医生并损害治疗效果。需要开展更多工作来规范用于头孢地尔抗菌药物敏感性试验的实用且可重复的方法。