Paris Est Créteil University UPEC, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Henri Mondor Hospital, Gastroenterology Department, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire TRUE InnovaTive theRapy for immUne disordErs, Créteil F-94010, France.
Paris IBD Center, Groupe hospitalier Ambroise Paré - Hartmann 25-27 boulevard Victor Hugo, 92200 Neuilly sur Seine, France.
J Crohns Colitis. 2023 Jul 5;17(7):1066-1078. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad020.
Rates of enrolment in clinical trials in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] have decreased dramatically in recent years. This has led to delays, increased costs and failures to develop novel treatments.
The aim of this work is to describe the current bottlenecks of IBD clinical trial enrolment and propose solutions.
A taskforce comprising experienced IBD clinical trialists from academic centres and pharmaceutical companies involved in IBD clinical research predefined the four following levels: [1] study design, [2] investigative centre, [3] physician and [4] patient. At each level, the taskforce collectively explored the reasons for declining enrolment rates and generated an inventory of potential solutions.
The main reasons identified included the overall increased demands for trials, the high screen failure rates, particularly in Crohn's disease, partly due to the lack of correlation between clinical and endoscopic activity, and the use of complicated endoscopic scoring systems not reflective of the totality of inflammation. In addition, complex trial protocols with restrictive eligibility criteria, increasing burden of procedures and administrative tasks enhance the need for qualified resources in study coordination. At the physician level, lack of dedicated time and training is crucial. From the patients' perspective, long washout periods from previous medications and protocol requirements not reflecting clinical practice, such as prolonged steroid management and placebo exposures, limit their participation in clinical trials.
This joint effort is proposed as the basis for profound clinical trial transformation triggered by investigative centres, contract research organizations, sponsors and regulatory agencies.
近年来,炎症性肠病[IBD]临床试验的入组率大幅下降。这导致了延误、增加了成本,并且未能开发出新的治疗方法。
本研究旨在描述当前炎症性肠病临床试验入组的瓶颈,并提出解决方案。
一个由来自学术中心和参与炎症性肠病临床研究的制药公司的经验丰富的炎症性肠病临床试验专家组成的工作组预先定义了以下四个层次:[1]研究设计,[2]研究中心,[3]医生和[4]患者。在每个层次上,工作组共同探讨了入组率下降的原因,并提出了潜在解决方案的清单。
确定的主要原因包括试验总体需求增加、高筛选失败率,尤其是在克罗恩病中,部分原因是临床和内镜活动之间缺乏相关性,以及使用复杂的内镜评分系统无法反映炎症的全貌。此外,复杂的试验方案具有限制性的入选标准,增加了程序和行政任务的负担,这增加了对研究协调方面的合格资源的需求。在医生层面上,缺乏专门的时间和培训是至关重要的。从患者的角度来看,由于药物洗脱期长,以及方案要求不符合临床实践,如延长激素管理和安慰剂暴露,限制了他们参与临床试验。
这项联合工作旨在为研究中心、合同研究组织、赞助商和监管机构发起的深刻的临床试验变革奠定基础。