Outtier An, Janssens Rosanne, Barbier Liese, Sabino João, Verstockt Bram, Vermeire Séverine, Huys Isabelle, Ferrante Marc
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
United European Gastroenterol J. 2025 May;13(4):542-551. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12731. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
Eligibility criteria in clinical trials have been criticised for being overly restrictive without clinical justification.
We aimed to investigate the types, evolution, and current status of eligibility criteria in clinical trials for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).
We performed a clinical trial databank search on clinicaltrials.gov, and included all Phase 3 placebo-controlled randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) investigating biologics or small molecules as induction therapy for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Eligibility criteria were analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively.
Fifty-nine RCTs were identified between the year 2000 and 2022 (30 for CD and 29 for UC). The median (interquartile range) number of eligibility criteria was 44 (38-49), and did not significantly change over the studied time period (p = 0.26). Qualitative analysis showed that common patient populations, such as older patients, therapy refractory patients, patients with comorbidities, prior malignancies, unclassified IBD type, ulcerative proctitis, stricturing and fistulizing CD, as well as patients with an ostomy, were often excluded. Heterogeneity in eligibility criteria across the different IBD clinical trials was found, such as for disease activity measurement, dosage of concomitant medication, wash-out period of advanced therapies, and laboratory tests.
The median number of eligibility criteria for IBD RCTs did not significantly change over time. The eligibility criteria are however restrictive and complex, limiting the generalisability of efficacy and safety outcomes in daily practice when drugs are approved. Future research is needed to investigate the impact of broadening eligibility criteria to better encompass real-world practice.
临床试验的入选标准因缺乏临床依据却过于严格而受到批评。
我们旨在研究炎症性肠病(IBD)临床试验入选标准的类型、演变及现状。
我们在clinicaltrials.gov上进行了临床试验数据库搜索,纳入了所有研究生物制剂或小分子作为中重度克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC)诱导治疗的3期安慰剂对照随机对照试验(RCT)。对入选标准进行了定量和定性分析。
在2000年至2022年期间共识别出59项RCT(30项针对CD,29项针对UC)。入选标准的中位数(四分位间距)为44(38 - 49),在研究时间段内无显著变化(p = 0.26)。定性分析表明,常见的患者群体,如老年患者、治疗难治性患者、合并症患者、既往有恶性肿瘤患者、未分类的IBD类型患者、溃疡性直肠炎患者、狭窄性和瘘管性CD患者以及有造口的患者,常常被排除在外。不同IBD临床试验的入选标准存在异质性,如疾病活动度测量、伴随用药剂量、先进疗法的洗脱期以及实验室检查等方面。
IBD RCT入选标准的中位数随时间无显著变化。然而,入选标准具有限制性且复杂,限制了药物获批后日常实践中疗效和安全性结果的可推广性。需要未来的研究来调查扩大入选标准以更好地涵盖现实世界实践的影响。