• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服免疫治疗中花生过敏的儿科患者的焦虑评估验证。

Validated anxiety assessments among pediatric patients with peanut allergy on oral immunotherapy.

机构信息

Connecticut Asthma and Allergy Center, West Hartford, Connecticut.

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 May;130(5):657-663. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.01.028. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.anai.2023.01.028
PMID:36738780
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although efficacy, safety, and quality of life measures associated with peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT) have been studied, the relationship between peanut OIT and clinical anxiety has not yet been evaluated. The latter is important to help providers and families have an improved shared medical decision discussion around the benefits of initiating OIT.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between undergoing OIT and anxiety in patients with peanut allergy.

METHODS

In this prospective cross-sectional cohort study, using validated and age-appropriate anxiety scales administered with electronic survey questionnaires, we used generalized linear regressions to compare anxiety between patients undergoing OIT and similar patients with peanut allergy but not on OIT (controls).

RESULTS

In the younger cohort (<7 years, n = 80), there was generally a low prevalence of diagnosable anxiety across patients on OIT and controls. In the older cohort (>7 years, n = 125), there was a higher prevalence of anxiety but no clinically meaningful difference between anxiety scores of patients on OIT and controls. In the older cohort, patients with asthma were more likely to have higher mean anxiety scores (P = .04), as were female patients compared with male patients (P = .004). A subanalysis of separation anxiety scores in the older cohort revealed that younger age (7-12 years vs >12 years, P < .001), non-White race (P = .04), and eczema (P = .02) were found to be meaningful predictors of higher scores. A subanalysis of social anxiety on the older cohort pointed toward non-White race as a meaningful predictor of higher scores (P < .02).

CONCLUSION

The clinical implications of these findings suggest that allergists should particularly consider screening children with food allergy for anxiety and anxiety subtypes among patients who are non-White, female, or have asthma.

摘要

背景

虽然已经研究了与花生口服免疫治疗(OIT)相关的疗效、安全性和生活质量措施,但花生 OIT 与临床焦虑之间的关系尚未得到评估。后者对于帮助提供者和家庭改善围绕启动 OIT 的益处的共同医疗决策讨论很重要。

目的

调查接受 OIT 的患者与花生过敏患者之间的焦虑关系。

方法

在这项前瞻性横断面队列研究中,我们使用经过验证和适合年龄的焦虑量表,并通过电子调查问卷调查,使用广义线性回归比较正在接受 OIT 的患者和未接受 OIT 的类似花生过敏患者(对照组)之间的焦虑情况。

结果

在年龄较小的队列(<7 岁,n=80)中,接受 OIT 的患者和对照组的患者中普遍存在诊断性焦虑的低患病率。在年龄较大的队列(>7 岁,n=125)中,焦虑的患病率较高,但接受 OIT 的患者和对照组的焦虑评分之间没有临床意义上的差异。在较大的队列中,患有哮喘的患者更有可能出现较高的平均焦虑评分(P=.04),与男性患者相比,女性患者的焦虑评分也更高(P=.004)。对较大队列中分离焦虑评分的亚分析表明,年龄较小(7-12 岁比>12 岁,P<.001)、非白种人(P=.04)和湿疹(P=.02)是更高分数的重要预测指标。对较大队列中社交焦虑的亚分析表明,非白种人是更高分数的重要预测指标(P<.02)。

结论

这些发现的临床意义表明,过敏症专家应特别考虑对患有食物过敏的儿童进行焦虑症和焦虑症亚型的筛查,尤其是在非白种人、女性或患有哮喘的患者中。

相似文献

1
Validated anxiety assessments among pediatric patients with peanut allergy on oral immunotherapy.口服免疫治疗中花生过敏的儿科患者的焦虑评估验证。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 May;130(5):657-663. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.01.028. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
2
Probiotic peanut oral immunotherapy versus oral immunotherapy and placebo in children with peanut allergy in Australia (PPOIT-003): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2b trial.益生菌花生口服免疫治疗与口服免疫治疗和安慰剂在澳大利亚花生过敏儿童中的比较(PPOIT-003):一项多中心、随机、2b 期试验。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022 Mar;6(3):171-184. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00006-2. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
3
Peanut Oral Immunotherapy With or Without H and H Antihistamine Premedication for Peanut Allergy (PISCES): A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial.花生口服免疫治疗联合或不联合 H 和 H 抗组胺药预处理治疗花生过敏(PISCES):一项安慰剂对照随机临床试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Sep;10(9):2386-2394. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.05.015. Epub 2022 May 25.
4
Parent and child perception of quality of life in a randomized controlled peanut oral immunotherapy trial.家长和儿童对随机对照花生口服免疫治疗试验中生活质量的感知。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2019 Sep;30(6):638-645. doi: 10.1111/pai.13066. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
5
Peanut oral immunotherapy in a pediatric allergy clinic: Patient factors associated with clinical outcomes.儿科过敏诊所中的花生口服免疫疗法:与临床结果相关的患者因素。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Aug;127(2):214-222.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.04.003. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
6
Early decrease in basophil sensitivity to Ara h 2 precedes sustained unresponsiveness after peanut oral immunotherapy.花生口服免疫治疗后,嗜碱性粒细胞对 Ara h 2 的敏感性早期下降先于持续无反应。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Nov;144(5):1310-1319.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.07.028. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
7
Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study).多中心、随机、对照试验研究方案,评估益生菌和花生口服免疫治疗(PPOIT)与单独口服免疫治疗(OIT)和安慰剂相比在诱导花生过敏儿童脱敏或耐受方面的有效性(PPOIT-003 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e035871. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035871.
8
Efficacy, Safety, and Quality of Life in a Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Low-Dose Peanut Oral Immunotherapy in Children with Peanut Allergy.在一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照的临床试验中,评估低剂量花生口服免疫治疗在儿童花生过敏中的疗效、安全性和生活质量。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Feb;7(2):479-491.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.10.048. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
9
Changing Patient Mindsets about Non-Life-Threatening Symptoms During Oral Immunotherapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.改变患者对口服免疫治疗中非危及生命症状的观念:一项随机临床试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 May-Jun;7(5):1550-1559. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.01.022. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
10
High Degree of Desensitization After 1 Year of Early-Life Peanut Oral Immunotherapy: Small Children Oral Immunotherapy (SmaChO) Randomized Controlled Trial.早期生活花生口服免疫治疗 1 年后高度脱敏:小儿口服免疫治疗(SmaChO)随机对照试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 May;12(5):1297-1305. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.02.030. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral Immunotherapy Should Play a Key Role in Preschool Food Allergy Management.口服免疫疗法应在学龄前儿童食物过敏管理中发挥关键作用。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2025 Apr;55(4):294-306. doi: 10.1111/cea.70013. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
2
Food oral immunotherapy.食物口服免疫疗法
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2025 Feb 12;20(Suppl 3):82. doi: 10.1186/s13223-025-00948-5.
3
Real-world experience: a retrospective pediatric chart review to determine why patients and caregivers discontinue oral immunotherapy.真实世界经验:一项回顾性儿科病历审查,以确定患者和护理人员停止口服免疫疗法的原因。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2024 Oct 15;20(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13223-024-00912-9.