Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 May;12(5):1297-1305. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.02.030. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
The prevalence of peanut allergy is about 2% and mostly lifelong. Studies of oral immunotherapy (OIT) with peanut (the daily oral intake of an initially low and then increasing dose of peanut) often show problematic side effects, but there are indications of better safety and effect in younger children compared with older children and adults.
To determine the safety and effectiveness of peanut OIT with a slow up-dosing strategy and low maintenance dose in children aged 1 to 3 years who were allergic to peanut, through a 1-year interim analysis.
In a randomized controlled trial (2:1 ratio), 75 children, median age 31 months (interquartile range [IQR], 23-40 months) were assigned to receive peanut OIT (n = 50) or peanut avoidance (n = 25).
In the OIT and avoidance groups, 43 of 50 and 20 of 25 children, respectively, performed the 1-year open oral peanut challenge. A cumulative dose of 750 mg peanut protein after 1 year was tolerated by 72% (36 of 50 children) in the OIT group compared with 4% (1 of 25) in the avoidance group (P < .001). Median tolerated cumulative dose was 2,750 mg (IQR, 275-5,000 mg) peanut protein in the OIT group compared with 2.8 mg (IQR, 0.3-27.8 mg) in the avoidance group (P < .001). Of the doses administered at home during the first year of OIT, 1.4% resulted in adverse events and 79% were mild, and three doses of epinephrine were given at home to two individuals.
In children aged 1 to 3 years, peanut OIT with the combination of slow up-dosing and low maintenance dose seems safe and effective after 1 year.
花生过敏的患病率约为 2%,且大多为终身性。研究表明,口服免疫疗法(OIT,即通过每日口服一定剂量的花生,起始剂量较低,然后逐渐增加)常伴有一些问题,但在较小年龄的儿童中,其安全性和效果似乎优于较大年龄的儿童和成人。
通过 1 年的中期分析,确定对 1 至 3 岁花生过敏儿童采用缓慢加量和低维持剂量的花生 OIT 的安全性和有效性。
这是一项随机对照试验(2:1 比例),75 名中位年龄 31 个月(四分位距[IQR],23-40 个月)的儿童被随机分配接受花生 OIT(n=50)或花生回避(n=25)。
在 OIT 组和回避组中,分别有 50 名儿童中的 43 名和 25 名儿童中的 20 名完成了 1 年的口服花生挑战。与回避组(4%,1/25)相比,OIT 组在 1 年后可耐受 750mg 花生蛋白的累积剂量的比例为 72%(50 名儿童中的 36 名)(P<.001)。OIT 组的中位耐受累积剂量为 2750mg(IQR,275-5000mg)花生蛋白,而回避组为 2.8mg(IQR,0.3-27.8mg)(P<.001)。在 OIT 的第 1 年,在家中服用的剂量中,有 1.4%导致不良反应,79%为轻度,有 2 名个体在家中接受了 3 次肾上腺素治疗。
在 1 至 3 岁儿童中,采用缓慢加量和低维持剂量相结合的花生 OIT,在 1 年后似乎是安全有效的。