• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

股骨远端假体置换与手术固定治疗股骨假体周围远端骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Distal Femoral Replacement versus Operative Fixation for Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atlanta, Georgia.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7 Suppl 2):S450-S458. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.044. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.044
PMID:36738864
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and distal femoral replacement (DFR) have been utilized in the management of periprosthetic distal femur fractures. At present, much of the literature has been limited to small retrospective series. The purpose of the current investigation was to present the results of pooled data to determine the complication rates associated with ORIF and DFR.

METHODS

Publications from 2010 to 2020 describing 10 or more periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated with ORIF (ie, single plate, intramedullary nail, and dual fixation) or DFR were included, resulting in 32 publications and 1,258 fractures (977 ORIF and 281 DFR). Occurrence of surgical complications, reoperations, and medical complications were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

The rate of surgical complications (ORIF versus DFR, 20.5 versus 14.9%, P = 1.0) and reoperations (12.9 versus 12.5%, P = 1.0) following DFR were similar. However, pooled analyses demonstrated that patients treated with DFR had a higher medical complication rate (ORIF versus DFR, 8.5 versus 23.1%, P = .0006).

CONCLUSION

ORIF and DFR for the treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures have similar surgical complication and reoperation profiles. While this review found an increased rate of medical complication following DFR, there are limitations in quality reporting in the literature, which should be considered when interpreting the study's findings. Failed ORIF can be salvaged with DFR, but the difficulty of this reoperation is dependent on the ORIF technique that was used. With future prospective studies, this review can help guide management of these fractures.

摘要

背景

切开复位内固定(ORIF)和股骨远端置换(DFR)已被用于治疗假体周围股骨远端骨折。目前,大量文献仅限于小回顾性系列研究。本研究的目的是提出汇总数据的结果,以确定与 ORIF 和 DFR 相关的并发症发生率。

方法

纳入了 2010 年至 2020 年期间描述了 10 例或更多假体周围股骨远端骨折采用 ORIF(即单钢板、髓内钉和双固定)或 DFR 治疗的文献,共纳入 32 篇文献和 1258 例骨折(977 例 ORIF 和 281 例 DFR)。评估和比较了手术并发症、再次手术和医疗并发症的发生情况。

结果

DFR 组的手术并发症发生率(ORIF 与 DFR 比较,20.5%与 14.9%,P=1.0)和再次手术率(12.9%与 12.5%,P=1.0)相似。然而,汇总分析显示,DFR 组的医疗并发症发生率较高(ORIF 与 DFR 比较,8.5%与 23.1%,P=0.0006)。

结论

ORIF 和 DFR 治疗假体周围股骨远端骨折的手术并发症和再次手术率相似。虽然本研究发现 DFR 后医疗并发症发生率增加,但文献中存在质量报告的局限性,在解释研究结果时应予以考虑。ORIF 失败后可采用 DFR 挽救,但这种再手术的难度取决于 ORIF 技术的应用。随着未来前瞻性研究的开展,本研究可以为这些骨折的治疗提供指导。

相似文献

1
Distal Femoral Replacement versus Operative Fixation for Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.股骨远端假体置换与手术固定治疗股骨假体周围远端骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7 Suppl 2):S450-S458. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.044. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
2
Early complications and reoperation rates are similar amongst open reduction internal fixation, intramedullary nail, and distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.对于假体周围股骨远端骨折,切开复位内固定、髓内钉和股骨远端置换术的早期并发症和再次手术率相似:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Jun;141(6):997-1006. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03866-4. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
3
Periprosthetic Fractures of the Distal Femur: Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation or Distal Femoral Replacement Superior?股骨远端假体周围骨折:切开复位内固定与股骨远端置换术哪个更优?
J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1402-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.033. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
4
A comparison of distal femoral replacement versus fixation in treating periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.远端股骨置换与固定治疗股骨假体周围髁上骨折的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jun;143(6):3335-3345. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04603-1. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
5
Distal femoral replacement or internal fixation for management of periprosthetic distal femur fractures: A systematic review.远端股骨置换或内固定治疗股骨假体周围远端骨折:系统评价。
Knee. 2022 Aug;37:121-131. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.06.008. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
6
Short-term outcomes of periprosthetic compared to native distal femur fractures, a national database study.与股骨远端原位骨折相比,人工关节周围骨折的短期预后:一项全国性数据库研究
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jan;143(1):115-124. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04000-0. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
7
Outcomes of Geriatric Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: Comparison of Fixation Versus Reconstruction.老年假体周围股骨远端骨折的治疗结果:固定与重建的比较。
J Orthop Trauma. 2023 Oct 1;37(10):480-484. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002624.
8
Distal Femur Replacement Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Treatment of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.远端股骨假体置换与切开复位内固定治疗股骨假体周围远端骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Trauma. 2022 Jan 1;36(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002141.
9
Predictors of Functional Recovery Following Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures.人工关节周围股骨远端骨折后功能恢复的预测因素
J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1571-1575. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.013. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
10
Optimal surgical treatment for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian-based network analysis.全膝关节置换术后假体周围股骨远端骨折的最佳手术治疗:基于贝叶斯的网络分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Feb 20;18(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03586-y.

引用本文的文献

1
The Nasser-Gavvala-Shirodkar-Botchu Classification: A Classification System for Loosening of Endoprosthetic Replacements.纳赛尔-加夫瓦拉-希罗德卡尔-博楚分类法:一种用于人工关节置换松动的分类系统。
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 6;14(17):6300. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176300.
2
Dual Construct for Very Low Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fracture-Case Series and Extensile Medial Parapatellar Single Incision Approach.用于极低假体周围股骨远端骨折的双结构——病例系列及髌旁内侧单一延长切口入路
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2025 Jun 19;16:21514593251352332. doi: 10.1177/21514593251352332. eCollection 2025.
3
Dual Plating for Periprosthetic Distal Femoral Fractures Using the Extensile Medial or Lateral Parapatellar Approach.
采用髌旁内侧或外侧延长入路对人工关节周围股骨远端骨折进行双钢板固定。
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Jul 20;28:101456. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101456. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Changing Epidemiology of Distal Femur Fractures: Increase in Geriatric Fractures and Rates of Distal Femur Replacement.股骨远端骨折流行病学的变化:老年骨折增加及股骨远端置换率上升
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Dec 15;32(24):e1289-e1298. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00007. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
5
Femoral component retention in Rorabeck type III periprosthetic knee fracture with plating fixation and bone cement augmentation. A new surgical technique and four cases reported.钢板固定联合骨水泥强化治疗Rorabeck III型人工膝关节周围骨折时股骨假体的固定:一种新的手术技术及4例病例报告
Trauma Case Rep. 2024 Jul 29;53:101084. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2024.101084. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Outcomes of distal femoral replacement versus internal fixation for metastatic bone diseases of the distal femur.股骨远端置换与内固定治疗股骨远端转移性骨病的疗效比较
J Orthop. 2024 Jun 25;58:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.06.031. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Management of Distal Femur Fractures: Replacement Versus Surgical Fixation Versus Conservative Management.股骨远端骨折的治疗:置换术、手术固定与保守治疗对比
Cureus. 2023 Sep 16;15(9):e45333. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45333. eCollection 2023 Sep.