• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纳赛尔-加夫瓦拉-希罗德卡尔-博楚分类法:一种用于人工关节置换松动的分类系统。

The Nasser-Gavvala-Shirodkar-Botchu Classification: A Classification System for Loosening of Endoprosthetic Replacements.

作者信息

Nasser Ahmed Abdul Hadi Harb, Gavvala Sai Niharika, Shirodkar Kapil, Botchu Rajesh

机构信息

The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK.

Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 6;14(17):6300. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176300.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14176300
PMID:40944061
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12429856/
Abstract

The indications for femoral endoprosthesis replacement (EPR) use in limb reconstruction have broadened over the last decade. Despite its success, loosening remains the most common reason for failure. No previous system has classified loosening based on the anatomical site in relation to the prosthesis. The aim of this study is to propose a simple reproducible classification system for EPR loosening. Adult patients that underwent a revision EPR for loosening from 1 January 2023-1 May 2025 were included. Radiographs and computed tomography (CT) images were retrospectively reviewed. The grading was developed on radiographs to classify loosening around EPRs as normal (grade 1), loosening at the shoulder (grade 2), loosening around the shaft of the peg (grade 3), loosening below the tip of the prosthesis (grade 4), associated penetration of prosthesis through the cortex (grade 5), and associated fracture (grade 6). A total of 28 patients were included. The majority of patients were male (n = 17; 61%) with a mean age of 50.6 years (SD 16.1). The average time from the index surgery to diagnosis of loosening was 10.1 years (SD 7.6). The most common pattern of loosening was grade 3 (N = 16; 57.1%). Our classification system proposes an easily adopted way to describe all patterns of loosening around EPRs, potentially guiding revision surgical strategies. Standardizing the approach in evaluating loosening will aid in producing national guidelines for managing this complex complication and may help improve future EPR design.

摘要

在过去十年中,用于肢体重建的股骨假体置换术(EPR)的适应证有所拓宽。尽管取得了成功,但松动仍然是最常见的失败原因。以前没有任何系统根据与假体相关的解剖部位对松动进行分类。本研究的目的是提出一种简单且可重复的EPR松动分类系统。纳入了2023年1月1日至2025年5月1日因松动而接受EPR翻修手术的成年患者。对X线片和计算机断层扫描(CT)图像进行了回顾性分析。在X线片上制定分级标准,将EPR周围的松动分为正常(1级)、肩部松动(2级)、钉杆周围松动(3级)、假体尖端以下松动(4级)、假体穿透皮质(5级)和伴有骨折(6级)。共纳入28例患者。大多数患者为男性(n = 17;61%),平均年龄50.6岁(标准差16.1)。从初次手术到诊断为松动的平均时间为10.1年(标准差7.6)。最常见的松动类型为3级(N = 16;57.1%)。我们的分类系统提出了一种易于采用的方法来描述EPR周围所有的松动模式,可能为翻修手术策略提供指导。规范评估松动的方法将有助于制定处理这种复杂并发症的国家指南,并可能有助于改进未来的EPR设计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d5f/12429856/cb15e427f364/jcm-14-06300-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d5f/12429856/f6da617ec080/jcm-14-06300-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d5f/12429856/f61ddcbba8e0/jcm-14-06300-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d5f/12429856/5a06b7906a64/jcm-14-06300-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d5f/12429856/92c63691c095/jcm-14-06300-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d5f/12429856/9a503126929a/jcm-14-06300-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d5f/12429856/25d7058a724c/jcm-14-06300-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d5f/12429856/cb15e427f364/jcm-14-06300-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d5f/12429856/f6da617ec080/jcm-14-06300-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d5f/12429856/f61ddcbba8e0/jcm-14-06300-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d5f/12429856/5a06b7906a64/jcm-14-06300-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d5f/12429856/92c63691c095/jcm-14-06300-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d5f/12429856/9a503126929a/jcm-14-06300-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d5f/12429856/25d7058a724c/jcm-14-06300-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d5f/12429856/cb15e427f364/jcm-14-06300-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
The Nasser-Gavvala-Shirodkar-Botchu Classification: A Classification System for Loosening of Endoprosthetic Replacements.纳赛尔-加夫瓦拉-希罗德卡尔-博楚分类法:一种用于人工关节置换松动的分类系统。
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 6;14(17):6300. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176300.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Proximal Femur Replacements for an Oncologic Indication Offer a Durable Endoprosthetic Reconstruction Option: A 40-year Experience.肿瘤适应证的近端股骨置换提供了一种持久的人工关节重建选择:40 年的经验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Nov 1;481(11):2236-2243. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002765. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
4
What Are the Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes of a Modified Cup-cage Technique for Pelvic Discontinuity?改良杯笼技术治疗骨盆不连续性的功能、影像学和生存结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2149-2160. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003186. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
5
Is 18 F-fluoride PET/CT an Accurate Tool to Diagnose Loosening After Total Joint Arthroplasty?18F-氟化物PET/CT是诊断全关节置换术后假体松动的准确工具吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):415-428. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003228. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
6
What Is the Cumulative Incidence of Femoral Stem Revision and Stem Complication in Cemented and Uncemented Hip Arthroplasty for Proximal Femoral Metastatic Bone Disease?对于股骨近端转移性骨病,骨水泥型和非骨水泥型髋关节置换术中股骨柄翻修及柄并发症的累积发生率是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003541.
7
What Is the Prosthetic Survival After Resection and Intercalary Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for Diaphyseal Bone Metastases of the Humerus and Femur?肱骨和股骨骨干转移瘤切除与节段性内置假体重建后的假体存活率是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Nov 1;481(11):2200-2210. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002669. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
8
Anterior Approach Total Ankle Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Cut Guides.使用患者特异性截骨导向器的前路全踝关节置换术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Aug 15;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00027. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
9
Elbow Fractures Overview肘部骨折概述
10
What Are the Complications, Reconstruction Survival, and Functional Outcomes of Modular Prosthesis and Allograft-prosthesis Composite for Proximal Femur Reconstruction in Children With Primary Bone Tumors?对于原发性骨肿瘤患儿的股骨近端重建,模块化假体及同种异体骨-假体复合物的并发症、重建存活率及功能结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):455-469. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003245. Epub 2024 Sep 3.

本文引用的文献

1
A UK multicentre cohort study of clinical outcomes of distal femoral replacement for nononcological conditions : the EndoProsthetic Replacement for nonOncological conditions (EPRO) study.
Bone Joint J. 2025 Jun 1;107-B(6):632-638. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-1303.R1.
2
Contemporary results of total femoral arthroplasties for non-oncological conditions.
Bone Joint J. 2025 Apr 1;107-B(4):449-454. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.107B4.BJJ-2024-0959.R1.
3
Surgical management of metastatic lesions in the proximal femur: a systematic review.股骨近端转移瘤的外科治疗:一项系统评价
EFORT Open Rev. 2025 Feb 3;10(2):104-114. doi: 10.1530/EOR-24-0138. Print 2025 Feb 1.
4
Contemporary Outcomes of Proximal Femoral Replacement as a Salvage Treatment in Nononcologic Severe Bone Loss.股骨近端置换术作为非肿瘤性严重骨缺损挽救治疗的当代疗效
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Sep;40(9S1):S449-S456. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.051. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
5
Role of Serum Biomarkers in Differentiating Periprosthetic Joint Infections from Aseptic Failures after Total Hip Arthroplasties.血清生物标志物在全髋关节置换术后假体周围感染与无菌性失败鉴别诊断中的作用
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 25;13(19):5716. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195716.
6
Comparative Outcomes and Failure Rates of Total Femur Replacement in Oncologic and Nononcologic Indications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.在肿瘤和非肿瘤适应证中全股骨置换的比较结果和失败率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JBJS Rev. 2024 Jul 5;12(7). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00022. eCollection 2024 Jul 1.
7
Proximal Femur Endoprosthesis Augmentation with Polymethylmethacrylate and Condylar Plate: A Case Series.使用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯和髁钢板对股骨近端假体进行增强:病例系列
J Orthop Case Rep. 2023 Oct;13(10):132-136. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2023.v13.i10.3964.
8
What are the indications and survivorship of tumor endoprosthetic reconstructions for patients with extremity metastatic bone disease?肢体转移性骨肿瘤患者行肿瘤假体重建的适应证和生存情况如何?
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;127(7):1196-1202. doi: 10.1002/jso.27236. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
9
Distal Femoral Replacement versus Operative Fixation for Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.股骨远端假体置换与手术固定治疗股骨假体周围远端骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7 Suppl 2):S450-S458. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.044. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
10
Classification and reconstruction of femoral bone defect in the revision of aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses: a 10-year multicenter retrospective analysis.股骨远端假体无菌性松动翻修术中股骨骨缺损的分类与重建:一项 10 年多中心回顾性分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Oct 27;23(1):935. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05885-7.