Suppr超能文献

一个 12 基因药物遗传学检测面板以预防药物不良反应:一项开放标签、多中心、对照、集群随机交叉实施研究。

A 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel to prevent adverse drug reactions: an open-label, multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised crossover implementation study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.

Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet. 2023 Feb 4;401(10374):347-356. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01841-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefit of pharmacogenetic testing before starting drug therapy has been well documented for several single gene-drug combinations. However, the clinical utility of a pre-emptive genotyping strategy using a pharmacogenetic panel has not been rigorously assessed.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised, crossover implementation study of a 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel in 18 hospitals, nine community health centres, and 28 community pharmacies in seven European countries (Austria, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, and the UK). Patients aged 18 years or older receiving a first prescription for a drug clinically recommended in the guidelines of the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (ie, the index drug) as part of routine care were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included previous genetic testing for a gene relevant to the index drug, a planned duration of treatment of less than 7 consecutive days, and severe renal or liver insufficiency. All patients gave written informed consent before taking part in the study. Participants were genotyped for 50 germline variants in 12 genes, and those with an actionable variant (ie, a drug-gene interaction test result for which the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group [DPWG] recommended a change to standard-of-care drug treatment) were treated according to DPWG recommendations. Patients in the control group received standard treatment. To prepare clinicians for pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing, local teams were educated during a site-initiation visit and online educational material was made available. The primary outcome was the occurrence of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions within the 12-week follow-up period. Analyses were irrespective of patient adherence to the DPWG guidelines. The primary analysis was done using a gatekeeping analysis, in which outcomes in people with an actionable drug-gene interaction in the study group versus the control group were compared, and only if the difference was statistically significant was an analysis done that included all of the patients in the study. Outcomes were compared between the study and control groups, both for patients with an actionable drug-gene interaction test result (ie, a result for which the DPWG recommended a change to standard-of-care drug treatment) and for all patients who received at least one dose of index drug. The safety analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of a study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03093818 and is closed to new participants.

FINDINGS

Between March 7, 2017, and June 30, 2020, 41 696 patients were assessed for eligibility and 6944 (51·4 % female, 48·6% male; 97·7% self-reported European, Mediterranean, or Middle Eastern ethnicity) were enrolled and assigned to receive genotype-guided drug treatment (n=3342) or standard care (n=3602). 99 patients (52 [1·6%] of the study group and 47 [1·3%] of the control group) withdrew consent after group assignment. 652 participants (367 [11·0%] in the study group and 285 [7·9%] in the control group) were lost to follow-up. In patients with an actionable test result for the index drug (n=1558), a clinically relevant adverse drug reaction occurred in 152 (21·0%) of 725 patients in the study group and 231 (27·7%) of 833 patients in the control group (odds ratio [OR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·54-0·91]; p=0·0075), whereas for all patients, the incidence was 628 (21·5%) of 2923 patients in the study group and 934 (28·6%) of 3270 patients in the control group (OR 0·70 [95% CI 0·61-0·79]; p <0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

Genotype-guided treatment using a 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel significantly reduced the incidence of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions and was feasible across diverse European health-care system organisations and settings. Large-scale implementation could help to make drug therapy increasingly safe.

FUNDING

European Union Horizon 2020.

摘要

背景

对于几种单基因-药物组合,在开始药物治疗前进行药物遗传学检测的益处已得到充分证实。然而,使用药物遗传学面板进行先发制人基因分型策略的临床实用性尚未经过严格评估。

方法

我们在七个欧洲国家(奥地利、希腊、意大利、荷兰、斯洛文尼亚、西班牙和英国)的 18 家医院、9 家社区卫生中心和 28 家社区药店进行了一项关于 12 个基因药物遗传学检测的开放标签、多中心、对照、集群随机、交叉实施研究。年龄在 18 岁或以上、正在接受荷兰药物遗传学工作组(Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group,DPWG)指南中临床推荐的药物(即索引药物)的首剂处方、作为常规护理的一部分的患者有资格入组。排除标准包括先前针对索引药物相关基因的基因检测、计划治疗时间少于 7 天连续时间、严重的肾功能或肝功能不全。所有患者在参与研究前均签署了书面知情同意书。参与者对 12 个基因中的 50 个种系变体进行了基因分型,对于具有可操作变体(即 DPWG 建议改变标准护理药物治疗的药物-基因相互作用检测结果)的患者,根据 DPWG 建议进行治疗。对照组患者接受标准治疗。为了让临床医生为先发制人的药物遗传学检测做好准备,对当地团队进行了现场启动访问的教育,并提供了在线教育材料。主要结局是在 12 周随访期间发生临床相关的药物不良反应。分析是在不考虑患者对 DPWG 指南的依从性的情况下进行的。主要分析采用门控分析,其中研究组与对照组中具有可操作药物-基因相互作用的患者的结果进行了比较,只有当差异具有统计学意义时,才对包括研究中的所有患者进行了分析。对研究组和对照组中具有可操作药物-基因相互作用检测结果(即 DPWG 建议改变标准护理药物治疗的结果)的患者以及所有接受至少一剂索引药物的患者进行了结果比较。安全性分析包括接受至少一剂研究药物的所有参与者。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT03093818,现已对新参与者关闭。

结果

在 2017 年 3 月 7 日至 2020 年 6 月 30 日期间,对 41696 名患者进行了入组评估,6944 名患者(51.4%为女性,48.6%为男性;97.7%自我报告为欧洲、地中海或中东血统)入组并被分配接受基因指导药物治疗(n=3342)或标准护理(n=3602)。99 名患者(52[1.6%]名研究组和 47[1.3%]名对照组)在分组后撤回了同意。652 名参与者(367[11.0%]在研究组和 285[7.9%]在对照组)在随访期间失访。在索引药物具有可操作测试结果的患者中(n=1558),研究组中 152 名(21.0%)患者和对照组中 231 名(27.7%)患者发生临床相关药物不良反应(比值比[OR]0.70[95%CI0.54-0.91];p=0.0075),而对于所有患者,研究组中 2923 名患者(21.5%)和对照组中 3270 名患者(28.6%)发生了该反应(OR0.70[95%CI0.61-0.79];p<0.0001)。

解释

使用 12 个基因药物遗传学检测的基因指导治疗显著降低了临床相关药物不良反应的发生率,并且在不同的欧洲医疗保健系统组织和环境中是可行的。大规模实施可以帮助使药物治疗越来越安全。

资金来源

欧盟地平线 2020 计划。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验