Zhao Hanye, Seo Dasom, Okada Junichi
Graduate School of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Graduate School of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Mikajima 2-579-15, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-1192, Japan.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb 4;15(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00620-8.
The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale has been found to reflect physiological responses, and this study aimed to assess the validity of using the Borg CR-10 scale and velocity loss to evaluate muscle fatigue quantified by surface electromyography during back squat (BS) exercise. A total of 15 collegiate male athletes underwent three non-explosive BS tasks comprising low, medium, and high volumes at 65% of their one-repetition maximum. RPEs, spectral fatigue index (SFI), and velocity loss during BS exercise were assessed throughout the trials. Significant differences in overall RPE (p < 0.001) and average SFI (p < 0.05) were observed between the conditions, whereas no significant difference was observed in average velocity loss. Significant increases in RPE and SFI (p < 0.001) were observed within the exercise process, whereas a significant increase in velocity loss was not observed. Correlation analyses indicated a significant correlation between RPE and SFI obtained during exercise (r = 0.573, p < 0.001). However, no significant correlation was observed between velocity loss and SFI. These results demonstrated that RPE could be used as a muscle fatigue predictor in BS exercise, but that velocity loss may not reflect muscle fatigue correctly when participants cannot and/or are not required to perform BS explosively. Furthermore, practitioners should not use velocity loss as a muscle fatigue indicator in some resistance exercise situations, such as rehabilitation, beginner, and hypertrophy programs.
已发现自感用力度(RPE)量表能反映生理反应,本研究旨在评估使用博格CR - 10量表和速度损失来评估在深蹲(BS)运动中通过表面肌电图量化的肌肉疲劳的有效性。总共15名大学男性运动员进行了三项非爆发性的深蹲任务,包括低、中、高运动量,负荷为其一次重复最大值的65%。在整个试验过程中评估了深蹲运动期间的RPE、频谱疲劳指数(SFI)和速度损失。各条件之间观察到总体RPE有显著差异(p < 0.001)和平均SFI有显著差异(p < 0.05),而平均速度损失未观察到显著差异。在运动过程中观察到RPE和SFI显著增加(p < 0.001),而速度损失未观察到显著增加。相关性分析表明运动期间获得的RPE和SFI之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.573,p < 0.001)。然而,速度损失和SFI之间未观察到显著相关性。这些结果表明,RPE可用作深蹲运动中的肌肉疲劳预测指标,但当参与者不能和/或不需要进行爆发性深蹲时,速度损失可能无法正确反映肌肉疲劳。此外,从业者在某些阻力运动情况下,如康复、初学者和肥大训练计划中,不应将速度损失用作肌肉疲劳指标。