Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影检测到的冠状动脉狭窄程度与慢性冠状动脉综合征患者 ACEF 风险评分的关系。

The relationship between degree of coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary computed tomography angiography and ACEF risk score in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.

机构信息

From the Department of Cardiology, Dokuz Eylul Universitesi, Izmir, Turkiye.

From the Department of Cardiology, Bakircay University Cigli Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkiye.

出版信息

Ann Saudi Med. 2023 Jan-Feb;43(1):35-41. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2023.35. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ACEF risk score (age, creatinine, and ejection fraction) has been associated with satisfactory predictive values not only for short-term and long-term mortality but also for major adverse cardiovascular events.

OBJECTIVES

Investigate the relationship between ACEF risk score and degree of coronary artery stenosis.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary percutaneous coronary intervention center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In patients with coronary coronary artery stenosis <70% were compared with patients with stenosis ≥70%. All were diagnosed with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and had undergone coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for the cut-off value of the ACEF risk score. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed for significant parameters related to degree of coronary artery stenosis in coronary CTA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Relationship between ACEF risk score and degree of coronary artery stenosis in coronary CTA.

SAMPLE SIZE

148 patients.

RESULTS

In the multivariable regression analysis; left ventricular ejection fraction (OR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.89-0.99, =.015) and ACEF risk score (OR: 5.63; 95% CI: 1.62-19.57, =.007) were independent predictors for degree of coronary artery stenosis. The ACEF risk score was statistically significantly higher in with patients with stenosis ≥70% (1.43 [0.59]) than in patients with stenosis <70% (0.98 [0.35]), <.001). An ACEF risk score value >1.04 was a predictor of the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary CTA in patients with CCS, with 66% sensitivity and 69% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

A high ACEF risk score (age, creatinine, ejection fraction) in patients with CCS is associated with the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary CTA, and was useful as an assessment tool for coronary angiography in patients with CCS.

LIMITATIONS

Since we do not have long-term follow-up results, we do not know the prognostic value of the ACEF risk score in the long-term follow-up of patients with CCS.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

摘要

背景

ACEF 风险评分(年龄、肌酐和射血分数)不仅与短期和长期死亡率,而且与主要不良心血管事件具有良好的预测价值。

目的

探讨 ACEF 风险评分与冠状动脉狭窄程度的关系。

设计

回顾性、观察性研究。

地点

三级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中心。

患者和方法

比较冠状动脉狭窄<70%的患者与狭窄≥70%的患者。所有患者均被诊断为慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS),并接受了冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)检查。对 ACEF 风险评分的截断值进行了受试者工作特征分析。对冠状动脉 CTA 中与冠状动脉狭窄程度相关的显著参数进行了单变量和多变量回归分析。

主要观察指标

ACEF 风险评分与冠状动脉 CTA 中冠状动脉狭窄程度的关系。

样本量

148 例患者。

结果

多变量回归分析显示,左心室射血分数(OR:0.94;95%CI:0.89-0.99,P=.015)和 ACEF 风险评分(OR:5.63;95%CI:1.62-19.57,P=.007)是冠状动脉狭窄程度的独立预测因素。冠状动脉 CTA 显示狭窄≥70%的患者 ACEF 风险评分(1.43 [0.59])明显高于狭窄<70%的患者(0.98 [0.35]),<.001)。ACEF 风险评分>1.04 是预测 CCS 患者冠状动脉 CTA 检测到严重冠状动脉狭窄的指标,其敏感性为 66%,特异性为 69%。

结论

CCS 患者 ACEF 风险评分高(年龄、肌酐、射血分数)与冠状动脉 CTA 检测到严重冠状动脉狭窄相关,可作为 CCS 患者冠状动脉造影评估工具。

局限性

由于我们没有长期随访结果,因此我们不知道 ACEF 风险评分在 CCS 患者长期随访中的预后价值。

利益冲突

无。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c55/9899341/9dc3d7ac919a/0256-4947.2023.35-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验