From the Department of Cardiology, Dokuz Eylul Universitesi, Izmir, Turkiye.
From the Department of Cardiology, Bakircay University Cigli Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkiye.
Ann Saudi Med. 2023 Jan-Feb;43(1):35-41. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2023.35. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
The ACEF risk score (age, creatinine, and ejection fraction) has been associated with satisfactory predictive values not only for short-term and long-term mortality but also for major adverse cardiovascular events.
Investigate the relationship between ACEF risk score and degree of coronary artery stenosis.
Retrospective, observational study.
Tertiary percutaneous coronary intervention center.
In patients with coronary coronary artery stenosis <70% were compared with patients with stenosis ≥70%. All were diagnosed with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and had undergone coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for the cut-off value of the ACEF risk score. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed for significant parameters related to degree of coronary artery stenosis in coronary CTA.
Relationship between ACEF risk score and degree of coronary artery stenosis in coronary CTA.
148 patients.
In the multivariable regression analysis; left ventricular ejection fraction (OR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.89-0.99, =.015) and ACEF risk score (OR: 5.63; 95% CI: 1.62-19.57, =.007) were independent predictors for degree of coronary artery stenosis. The ACEF risk score was statistically significantly higher in with patients with stenosis ≥70% (1.43 [0.59]) than in patients with stenosis <70% (0.98 [0.35]), <.001). An ACEF risk score value >1.04 was a predictor of the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary CTA in patients with CCS, with 66% sensitivity and 69% specificity.
A high ACEF risk score (age, creatinine, ejection fraction) in patients with CCS is associated with the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary CTA, and was useful as an assessment tool for coronary angiography in patients with CCS.
Since we do not have long-term follow-up results, we do not know the prognostic value of the ACEF risk score in the long-term follow-up of patients with CCS.
None.
ACEF 风险评分(年龄、肌酐和射血分数)不仅与短期和长期死亡率,而且与主要不良心血管事件具有良好的预测价值。
探讨 ACEF 风险评分与冠状动脉狭窄程度的关系。
回顾性、观察性研究。
三级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中心。
比较冠状动脉狭窄<70%的患者与狭窄≥70%的患者。所有患者均被诊断为慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS),并接受了冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)检查。对 ACEF 风险评分的截断值进行了受试者工作特征分析。对冠状动脉 CTA 中与冠状动脉狭窄程度相关的显著参数进行了单变量和多变量回归分析。
ACEF 风险评分与冠状动脉 CTA 中冠状动脉狭窄程度的关系。
148 例患者。
多变量回归分析显示,左心室射血分数(OR:0.94;95%CI:0.89-0.99,P=.015)和 ACEF 风险评分(OR:5.63;95%CI:1.62-19.57,P=.007)是冠状动脉狭窄程度的独立预测因素。冠状动脉 CTA 显示狭窄≥70%的患者 ACEF 风险评分(1.43 [0.59])明显高于狭窄<70%的患者(0.98 [0.35]),<.001)。ACEF 风险评分>1.04 是预测 CCS 患者冠状动脉 CTA 检测到严重冠状动脉狭窄的指标,其敏感性为 66%,特异性为 69%。
CCS 患者 ACEF 风险评分高(年龄、肌酐、射血分数)与冠状动脉 CTA 检测到严重冠状动脉狭窄相关,可作为 CCS 患者冠状动脉造影评估工具。
由于我们没有长期随访结果,因此我们不知道 ACEF 风险评分在 CCS 患者长期随访中的预后价值。
无。