Senoner Thomas, Plank Fabian, Barbieri Fabian, Beyer Christoph, Birkl Katharina, Widmann Gerlig, Adukauskaite Agne, Friedrich Guy, Dichtl Wolfgang, Feuchtner Gudrun M
Department of Internal Medicine III- Cardiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria.
Department of Internal Medicine III- Cardiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria.
Atherosclerosis. 2020 May;300:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
Long-term data relating coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) to coronary artery disease (CAD) prognosis including novel CTA-biomarkers ("high-risk plaque criteria") is scarce. The aim of this study was to define predictors of long-term outcomes.
1430 low-to-intermediate risk patients (57.9 ± 11.1 years; 44.4% females) who underwent CTA and coronary calcium scoring (CCS) were prospectively enrolled. CTAs were evaluated for (1) stenosis severity CADRADS 0-4 (minimal <25%, mild 25-50%, moderate 50-70%, severe >70%), (2) mixed plaque burden weighted for non-calcified plaque (NCP), and (3) high-risk-plaque (HRP) criteria: low-attenuation-plaque (LAP), napkin-ring-sign, spotty calcifications <3 mm or remodeling index >1.1. Endpoints were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, composite fatal and nonfatal major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
Over a mean follow-up of 10.55 years ± 1.98, 106 patients (7.4%) died, 25 from cardiovascular events (1.75%). Composite MACE occurred in 57 (3.9%) patients. In patients with negative CTA, cardiovascular mortality and MACE rates were 0% and 0.2%. Stenosis severity by CTA predicted all 3 endpoints (p < 0.001) while CCS >100 AU predicted only all-cause mortality (p = 0.045) but not MACE. The high risk plaque criteria LAP <60HU (HR: 4.00, 95%CI 95% 1.52-10.52, p = 0.005) and napkin-ring (HR 4.11, CI 95% 1.77-9.52, p = 0.001) predicted MACE but not all-cause-mortality, after adjusting for risk factors, while spotty calcification and remodeling index did not. Similarly, mixed plaque burden predicted MACE (p < 0.0001). HRP criteria, if added to CADRADS + CCS for prediction of MACE, were superior to CCS (c = 0.816 vs 0.716, p < 0.001). In 33.5% of CCS zero patients, non-calcified fibroatheroma were found.
Long-term prognosis is excellent if CTA is negative for CAD. The high-risk plaque criteria LAP<60HU and napkin-ring-sign were independent predictors of MACE while HRP criteria added incremental prognostic value.
关于冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)预后相关的长期数据,包括新型CTA生物标志物(“高危斑块标准”)较为匮乏。本研究的目的是确定长期预后的预测因素。
前瞻性纳入1430例低至中度风险患者(年龄57.9±11.1岁;44.4%为女性),这些患者均接受了CTA和冠状动脉钙化评分(CCS)。对CTA进行评估的内容包括:(1)狭窄严重程度CADRADS 0 - 4级(轻度<25%,中度25 - 50%,重度50 - 70%,极重度>70%),(2)混合斑块负荷(根据非钙化斑块(NCP)加权),以及(3)高危斑块(HRP)标准:低衰减斑块(LAP)、餐巾环征、直径<3mm的斑点状钙化或重塑指数>1.1。终点指标为全因死亡率和心血管死亡率、致命和非致命性主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的复合终点。
在平均10.55年±1.98年的随访期内,106例患者(7.4%)死亡,其中25例死于心血管事件(1.75%)。57例(3.9%)患者发生了MACE复合终点事件。CTA结果为阴性的患者,心血管死亡率和MACE发生率分别为0%和0.2%。CTA显示的狭窄严重程度可预测所有3个终点指标(p<0.001),而CCS>100 AU仅可预测全因死亡率(p = 0.045),但不能预测MACE。在调整风险因素后,高危斑块标准LAP<60HU(HR:4.00,95%CI 95% 1.52 - 10.52,p = 0.005)和餐巾环征(HR 4.11,CI 95% 1.77 - 9.52,p = 0.001)可预测MACE,但不能预测全因死亡率,而斑点状钙化和重塑指数则不能。同样,混合斑块负荷可预测MACE(p<0.0001)。如果将HRP标准添加到CADRADS + CCS中用于预测MACE,则其优于CCS(c = 0.816 vs 0.716,p < 0.001)。在CCS为零的患者中,33.5%发现了非钙化纤维粥样斑块。
如果CTA显示CAD为阴性,则长期预后良好。高危斑块标准LAP<60HU和餐巾环征是MACE的独立预测因素,而HRP标准增加了预后价值。