Si HuaYang, Chen Yimeng, Yang Jie, Wen Xiaodong
State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, Department of Chinese Medicines Analysis, School of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China.
State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, Department of Chinese Medicines Analysis, School of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China.
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2023 Apr 1;227:115272. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2023.115272. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
Although the roots of Achyranthes bidentata (AB), Cyathula officinalis (CO) and Achyranthes aspera (AA) are different drugs, they are always confused in clinical practice due to their similar chemical components and functions. As polysaccharides are abundant in these drugs, a systematic comparison of polysaccharides from AB, CO and AA is not only necessary to understand their similar but not identical functions, but also helpful for the quality control of them. In this study, polysaccharides from 22 batches of AB, CO and AA were compared with monosaccharide composition, molecular weight distribution and saccharide mapping. Polysaccharides of AB, CO and AA had similar monosaccharide compositions but their relative contents of fructose, glucuronic acid, galacturonic acid and glucose were significant different, and could be used as key markers to distinguish them. Results from molecular weight distribution and saccharide mapping showed polysaccharides from AB, CO and AA were mainly composed of fructans with β-2,1 and β-2, 6-D-fructosidic linkages, but their degree of polymerization were different. Meanwhile, pectins were also contained in these three drugs. AB is partial to immunomodulation while CO is partial to removing blood stasis. Fructans and pectins are the similar bioactive substance basis of AB, CO and AA whereas their structural difference might be contributed to the efficacy differentia of these three drugs. This study provides a better understanding on the profiles of polysaccharides from AB, CO and AA, further guiding their clinical usage and facilitating their quality control.
虽然牛膝、川牛膝和倒扣草的根是不同的药材,但由于它们化学成分和功能相似,在临床实践中常被混淆。由于这些药材中多糖含量丰富,对牛膝、川牛膝和倒扣草中的多糖进行系统比较,不仅有助于了解它们相似但不完全相同的功能,也有助于对它们进行质量控制。在本研究中,对22批次的牛膝、川牛膝和倒扣草中的多糖进行了单糖组成、分子量分布和糖图谱比较。牛膝、川牛膝和倒扣草的多糖具有相似的单糖组成,但它们的果糖、葡萄糖醛酸、半乳糖醛酸和葡萄糖的相对含量存在显著差异,可作为区分它们的关键标志物。分子量分布和糖图谱结果表明,牛膝、川牛膝和倒扣草中的多糖主要由具有β-2,1和β-2,6-D-果糖苷键的果聚糖组成,但它们的聚合度不同。同时,这三种药材中也含有果胶。牛膝偏于免疫调节,川牛膝偏于活血化瘀。果聚糖和果胶是牛膝、川牛膝和倒扣草相似的生物活性物质基础,而它们的结构差异可能导致了这三种药材功效的差异。本研究有助于更好地了解牛膝、川牛膝和倒扣草中多糖的概况,进一步指导它们的临床应用并促进其质量控制。