Taboni Anna, Vinetti Giovanni, Piva Simone, Gorghelli Giulia, Ferretti Guido, Fagoni Nazzareno
Department of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Italy.
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2023 May;311:104025. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2023.104025. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
The purpose was to compare the resting energy expenditure (REE) measured with the Q-NRG™+ metabolic-cart (MREE) with REE predicted by equations (the Harris-Benedict formula and an equation developed in ward, REE-HB and REE-W, respectively). We also aimed to assess the agreement of the measurements of oxygen consumption (V̇O) and carbon dioxide production (V̇CO) at different inspired fractions of oxygen (FiO).
27 mechanically ventilated ICU patients were enrolled. V̇O and V̇CO were measured by Q-NRG™+ during breathing 40% and 60% FiO. MREE was compared with REE-W and REE-HB normalized for body weight.
V̇O was 233.0 (95.2) ml/min and 217.5 (89.8) ml/min at FiO 40% and 60%, respectively (NS). V̇CO was 199.0 (91.7) ml/min at FiO 40%, and 197.5 (85.5) ml/min at FiO 60% (NS). The REE estimated from the equations was significantly different from the MREE. The best agreement was found for the Harris-Benedict equation without correction for stress-factors. Harris-Benedict equation corrected overestimates REE.
This new metabolic cart Q-NRG™+ provides a concordance of values for V̇O and V̇CO when measured at different FiO, and is a reliable tool for estimating energy expenditure and assessing the nutritional needs of the patient. This study demonstrates that the estimation of REE using predictive formulas does not allow accurate calculation of metabolic demands in ventilated intensive care patient. However, predictive equations allow for a rapid assessment of REE and calculation of the amount of energy derived from different substrates.
目的是比较使用Q-NRG™+代谢车测量的静息能量消耗(MREE)与通过公式预测的静息能量消耗(分别为哈里斯-本尼迪克特公式和在病房中开发的公式,即REE-HB和REE-W)。我们还旨在评估在不同吸氧分数(FiO)下氧气消耗(V̇O)和二氧化碳产生(V̇CO)测量值之间的一致性。
纳入27例机械通气的重症监护病房患者。在吸入40%和60% FiO时,通过Q-NRG™+测量V̇O和V̇CO。将MREE与根据体重标准化后的REE-W和REE-HB进行比较。
在FiO为40%和60%时,V̇O分别为233.0(95.2)ml/分钟和217.5(89.8)ml/分钟(无显著差异)。在FiO为40%时,V̇CO为199.0(91.7)ml/分钟,在FiO为60%时,V̇CO为197.5(85.5)ml/分钟(无显著差异)。通过公式估算的REE与MREE显著不同。未校正应激因素的哈里斯-本尼迪克特公式一致性最佳。校正后的哈里斯-本尼迪克特公式高估了REE。
这种新型代谢车Q-NRG™+在不同FiO下测量时,V̇O和V̇CO的值具有一致性,是估算能量消耗和评估患者营养需求的可靠工具。本研究表明,使用预测公式估算REE无法准确计算机械通气重症监护患者的代谢需求。然而,预测方程可用于快速评估REE以及计算来自不同底物的能量量。