Suppr超能文献

联合应用关节囊周围神经组阻滞和腹横肌平面阻滞可显著减少同期接受髋关节镜检查和髋臼周围截骨术患者的阿片类药物使用量。

Addition of Pericapsular Nerve Group and Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks Significantly Reduces Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Concomitant Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy.

作者信息

Ellis Sean, Harris Joshua D, Flemming Derek P, Ellis Thomas J, Kollmorgen Robert C

机构信息

Orthopedics, Orthopedic One, Columbus, USA.

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jan 2;15(1):e33277. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33277. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have evaluated the effect of the pericapsular nerve group block for hip arthroscopy and the transverse abdominis plane block for periacetabular osteotomy and have shown decreased narcotic consumption in both groups. No published study has evaluated the effectiveness of combining the blocks when performing hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy under the same general anesthesia. It was hypothesized that patients treated for hip dysplasia with hip arthroscopy and concomitant periacetabular osteotomy using a pericapsular nerve group block, transverse abdominis plane block, and general anesthesia would have decreased postoperative pain and require less narcotic consumption than those undergoing the procedure with general anesthetic alone.  Methods: A single surgeon performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing concomitant hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy between 11/2020 and 6/2021. Fifteen consecutive patients undergoing the procedure with a general anesthetic alone (no-block group) were compared to 15 patients undergoing the same procedure with a combined pericapsular nerve group block, transverse abdominis plane block, and general anesthetic (block group). Hip arthroscopy was performed utilizing a post-free technique, and a rectus sparing approach was used for the periacetabular osteotomy. The nerve blocks were performed by multiple anesthesiologists using previously published methods. Operating room time, length of stay, visual analog scale pain scores, and total narcotic consumption in morphine milliequivalents were analyzed. Groups were compared using the chi-squared test for non-continuous demographic variables and a two-tailed t-test for continuous variables utilizing Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA), p-value set at 0.05 for significance.  Results: The no-block group consisted of 14 females and one male, while the block group was all females. No significant differences were observed between age, sex, BMI, surgery time, length of stay, or procedures performed, p>0.05. The maximal visual analog scale score in the post-anesthesia care unit was 8 ± 1.3 vs. 7 ± 1.9 in the no-block vs. block groups, respectively, p=0.15. The average hospital floor visual analog scale score was 5.7 ± 1.3 vs. 4.8 ± 1.3 in the no-block vs. block groups, respectively, p=0.07. Total pain medications required were 217.6 ± 54.6 vs. 154 ± 41.9 morphine milliequivalents in the no-block vs. block groups, respectively, p=0.001. No complications were reported in either group, and no patient in the block group demonstrated motor nerve palsy or postoperative fall.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that patients undergoing combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia who had pericapsular nerve group, transverse abdominal plane block, and general anesthesia required fewer narcotics in the first 24 hours after surgery compared to those who had general anesthesia alone.

摘要

引言

既往研究评估了髋关节镜检查时关节囊周围神经丛阻滞以及髋臼周围截骨术时腹横肌平面阻滞的效果,结果显示两组的麻醉药物用量均有所减少。尚无已发表的研究评估在相同全身麻醉下进行髋关节镜检查和髋臼周围截骨术时联合应用这两种阻滞的有效性。研究假设为,对于因髋关节发育不良接受髋关节镜检查及同期髋臼周围截骨术的患者,采用关节囊周围神经丛阻滞、腹横肌平面阻滞及全身麻醉的患者,与仅接受全身麻醉手术的患者相比,术后疼痛减轻且麻醉药物用量减少。

方法

由一位外科医生对2020年11月至2021年6月期间连续接受同期髋关节镜检查和髋臼周围截骨术的患者进行回顾性分析。将连续15例仅接受全身麻醉手术的患者(非阻滞组)与15例接受关节囊周围神经丛阻滞、腹横肌平面阻滞联合全身麻醉手术的患者(阻滞组)进行比较。髋关节镜检查采用后游离技术,髋臼周围截骨术采用保留直肌入路。神经阻滞由多名麻醉医生采用既往发表的方法进行。分析手术时间、住院时间、视觉模拟评分法疼痛评分以及以吗啡毫克当量计的总麻醉药物用量。使用卡方检验分析非连续人口统计学变量,使用双尾t检验分析连续变量,采用Microsoft Excel(美国华盛顿州雷德蒙德市微软公司)进行分析,设定p值为0.05表示具有统计学意义。

结果

非阻滞组包括14名女性和1名男性,而阻滞组均为女性。在年龄、性别、体重指数、手术时间、住院时间或所施行的手术方面,两组间未观察到显著差异,p>0.05。麻醉后护理单元的最大视觉模拟评分,非阻滞组为8±1.3,阻滞组为7±1.9,p=0.15。医院病房的平均视觉模拟评分,非阻滞组为5.7±1.3,阻滞组为4.8±1.3,p=0.07。非阻滞组和阻滞组所需的总止痛药物分别为217.6±54.6和154±41.9吗啡毫克当量,p=0.001。两组均未报告并发症,阻滞组无患者出现运动神经麻痹或术后跌倒。

结论

本研究表明,对于因有症状的髋臼发育不良接受髋关节镜检查和髋臼周围截骨术联合手术的患者,与仅接受全身麻醉的患者相比,接受关节囊周围神经丛阻滞、腹横肌平面阻滞联合全身麻醉的患者术后24小时内所需的麻醉药物更少。

相似文献

6
The Addition of a Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Postoperative Pain Control Does Not Result in Less Narcotic Use After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb 15;6(2):100894. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100894. eCollection 2024 Apr.
9
Preoperative femoral nerve block in hip arthroscopic surgery: a retrospective review of 108 consecutive cases.
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jan;42(1):144-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546513510392. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
10
Randomized comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Oct;46(10):874-878. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102997. Epub 2021 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcomes of pericapsular nerve group block in hip arthroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 24;12(3):e70303. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70303. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Perioperative Management of Hip Arthroscopy.
Iowa Orthop J. 2025;45(1):179-186.

本文引用的文献

3
The Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Perioperative Pain Management for Hip Arthroscopy.
Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Jul 22;10(7):e1799-e1803. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2021.03.029. eCollection 2021 Jul.
4
Surgical Anatomy of the Rectus-Sparing Approach for Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Cadaveric Study.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2021 Jun 3;11(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.20.00030. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
6
Hip Dysplasia.
Clin Sports Med. 2021 Apr;40(2):271-288. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2020.11.004. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
8
Outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy for borderline hip dysplasia in adolescent patients.
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020 Apr 2;7(2):249-255. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnaa012. eCollection 2020 Jul.
9
Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block: A feasibility study of landmark based technique.
Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Aug;64(8):710-713. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_388_20. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
10
Combined pericapsular nerve group and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve blocks for surgical anaesthesia in hip arthroscopy.
Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Jul;64(7):638-640. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_57_20. Epub 2020 Jul 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验