Suppr超能文献

诊断访谈表与临床诊断的比较。

A comparison of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule and clinical diagnosis.

作者信息

Erdman H P, Klein M H, Greist J H, Bass S M, Bires J K, Machtinger P E

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53792.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1987 Nov;144(11):1477-80. doi: 10.1176/ajp.144.11.1477.

Abstract

The Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) was administered to 220 psychiatric patients by lay interviewers. Kappas for agreement between DIS and chart diagnoses ranged from .39 to -.03 and averaged .14 for 13 diagnostic categories. Agreement was best for affective, obsessive-compulsive, and schizophrenic disorders and was poorest for phobias where patients overemphasized fears. The authors suggest that clinician evaluation of information collected by the DIS is important, especially in diagnosing individual cases.

摘要

由非专业访谈者对220名精神科患者进行了诊断性访谈表(DIS)评估。DIS与病历诊断之间的一致性系数在0.39至 -0.03之间,13个诊断类别平均为0.14。情感障碍、强迫症和精神分裂症的一致性最佳,而恐惧症的一致性最差,因为患者过度强调恐惧。作者认为临床医生对DIS收集的信息进行评估很重要,尤其是在诊断个别病例时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验