Hesselbrock V, Stabenau J, Hesselbrock M, Mirkin P, Meyer R
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982 Jun;39(6):674-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290060036007.
Two structured interviews, the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime (SADS-L) and the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule (NIMH-DIS), were compared as methods of reducing information variance in the diagnostic process. Forty-two patients newly admitted to an alcohol treatment unit were randomly selected and were independently interviewed using the SADS-L and NIMH-DIS. The order of the interviews was random and they were separated by three to four days. Interrater reliability for each interview schedule was calculated using the kappa statistic and was found to be high. The degree of diagnostic concordance between the two interview schedules for several diagnostic categories was also found to be high.
对两种结构化访谈,即情感障碍与精神分裂症终身访谈表(SADS-L)和美国国立精神卫生研究所诊断访谈表(NIMH-DIS),作为减少诊断过程中信息差异的方法进行了比较。随机选取了42名新入住酒精治疗单元的患者,分别使用SADS-L和NIMH-DIS对其进行独立访谈。访谈顺序随机,且两次访谈间隔三到四天。使用kappa统计量计算每个访谈表的评分者间信度,结果发现信度较高。还发现两种访谈表在几个诊断类别上的诊断一致性程度也较高。