Suppr超能文献

比较印度南部/喀拉拉邦南部基于社区的糖尿病视网膜病变筛查、治疗及提高认知服务的三种模式

Comparing Three Models of Community-Based Diabetic Retinopathy Screening, Treatment, and Awareness Creation Services in Southern India / South Kerala.

作者信息

Soman Manoj, Iqbal Sameer, Nizar A P Abdul, Nair R Unnikrishnan

机构信息

Department of Vitreo Retinal Services, Chaithanya Eye Hospital and Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Indian J Community Med. 2022 Oct-Dec;47(4):506-509. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_1331_21. Epub 2022 Dec 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of three models of diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening from an economic perspective and their effectiveness in awareness creation, screening, and ability to deliver treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analysis of a prospective screening program for diabetes mellitus and DR in South Kerala was done. Three models were created: Model 1: blood screening camp, Model 2: comprehensive eye camp, and Model 3: institution-based screening camp.

RESULTS

Forty-seven camps were conducted in Model 1, 438 in Model 2, and 18 in Model 3. Of 94,993 people screened, the percentage of diabetes was 17.4. Of the diabetics screened, the percentage of retinopathy was 22.8. Model 1 was most economically viable to detect a large number of new diabetics. Model 2 was more economically challenging but had the best overall pickup rate for new DR patients. Model 3 had a lesser pickup of new DR patients.

CONCLUSION

Model 1 is effective in picking up new diabetics but poor for DR screening. Model 3 is cost-efficient with very high DR detection rates. Cost-effective screening activities and service delivery are best achieved through a well-planned Model 2 camp which has the best overall detection rate for DR.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在从经济角度评估三种糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)筛查模式的有效性,以及它们在提高认知、筛查和提供治疗能力方面的效果。

材料与方法

对喀拉拉邦南部的糖尿病和DR前瞻性筛查项目进行了分析。创建了三种模式:模式1:血液筛查营,模式2:综合眼科营,模式3:机构型筛查营。

结果

模式1开展了47次营,模式2开展了438次,模式3开展了18次。在接受筛查的94,993人中,糖尿病患者的比例为17.4%。在接受筛查的糖尿病患者中,视网膜病变患者的比例为22.8%。模式1在检测大量新糖尿病患者方面在经济上最可行。模式2在经济上更具挑战性,但对新DR患者的总体检出率最高。模式3对新DR患者的检出率较低。

结论

模式1在发现新糖尿病患者方面有效,但在DR筛查方面较差。模式3具有成本效益且DR检测率非常高。通过精心规划的模式2营可以最好地实现具有成本效益的筛查活动和服务提供,该模式对DR的总体检出率最高。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验