Suppr超能文献

本科胜任力医学教育中客观结构化临床考试准备情况评估量表的编制与验证

Development and Validation of Scale Assessing the Preparedness of Objective Structured Clinical Examination in Undergraduate Competency based Medical Education.

作者信息

Krishnamoorthy Yuvaraj, Kannusamy Sivaranjini, Ganesh Karthika, Thulasingam Mahalakshmy, Lakshminarayanan Subitha, Kar Sitanshu S

机构信息

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Indian J Community Med. 2022 Oct-Dec;47(4):522-526. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_1392_21. Epub 2022 Dec 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Formative assessments methods such as objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) are reliable and valid assessment tools employed under the competency-based medical education (CBME) curriculum. However, there was no uniform scale to assess the attributes of OSCE for any of the medical subjects. Hence, this study was done to develop and validate a scale to assess the attributes of OSCE and make sure that the intended objectives of the OSCE are achieved.

METHODS

The scale was developed using literature review and expert opinion. It consisted of 10 questions and response to these items was based on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from to . The final version was administered among 30 students undertaking survey community diagnosis (CD) posting during their third semester. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was performed to validate the scale.

RESULTS

Two-factor structures were obtained with eigenvalues of 4.32 and 1.90. Factor 1 consisted of seven items (positively faced questions) accounting for 42.84% of the variance, whereas Factor 2 had the remaining three items (negatively faced questions) explaining 19.36% of the variance. Thus, together, the two factors explained 62.20% of the variance. Goodness-of-fit indices revealed good Comparative fit index (CFI) s of 0.90, Tucker Lewis index (TLI) of 0.87, and acceptable Standardized Root Mean Square Residua (SRMR) of 0.13. The reliability coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) for the scale was 0.81.

CONCLUSION

This study develops and validates a scale that can be used universally for assessing the attributes of OSCE across all disciplines and in medical education institutes in India.

摘要

背景

诸如客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)等形成性评估方法是基于能力的医学教育(CBME)课程中使用的可靠且有效的评估工具。然而,对于任何医学科目,都没有统一的量表来评估OSCE的属性。因此,开展本研究以开发并验证一个量表,用于评估OSCE的属性,并确保实现OSCE的预期目标。

方法

该量表通过文献综述和专家意见来开发。它由10个问题组成,对这些项目的回答基于从……到……的5点李克特量表。最终版本在30名第三学期进行社区诊断(CD)实习的学生中进行了施测。进行探索性和验证性因素分析以验证该量表。

结果

获得了两个因素结构,特征值分别为4.32和1.90。因素1由七个项目(正面问题)组成,占方差的42.84%,而因素2包含其余三个项目(负面问题),解释了19.36%的方差。因此,这两个因素共同解释了62.20%的方差。拟合优度指标显示比较拟合指数(CFI)为0.90,塔克·刘易斯指数(TLI)为0.87,标准化根均方残差(SRMR)为0.13,可接受。该量表的可靠性系数(克朗巴哈系数)为0.81。

结论

本研究开发并验证了一个量表,该量表可普遍用于评估印度所有学科和医学教育机构中OSCE的属性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c89/9891036/d7e6ebec4da5/IJCM-47-522-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验