Sugumar Ramya, Kumar Archana Prabu, Maheshkumar K, Padmavathi R, Ramachandran P, Ravichandran Latha, Anandan S, Vijayaraghavan P V
Assistant Professor (Pharmacology), Sri Ramachandra Medical College & Research Institute, SRIHER (DU), Chennai, India.
Assistant Professor, Medical Education Unit, College of Medicine & Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
Med J Armed Forces India. 2021 Feb;77(Suppl 1):S57-S64. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
Medical Council of India, introduced the Post Graduate (PG) curriculum as 'Competency Based Medical Education' (CBME). Feedback from the end users is a vital step in curriculum evaluation. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to develop and validate a Structured Feedback Questionnaire (SFQ) for postgraduates, encompassing all the components of the PG-CBME curriculum.
SFQ was developed with 23 Likert based questions and four open ended questions. Content validation was done by Lawshe method. After getting institutional ethics clearance and informed consent, SFQ was administered to 121 final year PGs (response rate 100%). We performed Principal component analysis (PCA), Structural equation modeling (SEM), Chi squared test (χ/df); goodness-of-fit index (GFI); adjusted GFI; comparative fit index (CFI) and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA). Cronbach's alpha was done for estimating the internal consistency.
The validation resulted in a three-factor model comprising of "curriculum" (42.1%), "assessment" (28%), and "support" (18.5%). Chi squared test (χ/df ratio) < 2, CFI (0.78), GFI (0.72) and RMSEA (0.09) indicated superior goodness of fit for the three-factor model for the sample data. All the extracted factors had good internal consistency of ≥0.9.
We believe that this 23 item SFQ is a valid and reliable tool which can be utilized for curriculum evaluation and thereby formulating recommendations to modify the existing curriculum wherever required, facilitating enriched program outcomes.
印度医学委员会引入了研究生(PG)课程,即“基于能力的医学教育”(CBME)。终端用户的反馈是课程评估的关键一步。因此,本研究的主要目的是开发并验证一份针对研究生的结构化反馈问卷(SFQ),涵盖PG-CBME课程的所有组成部分。
SFQ包含23个基于李克特量表的问题和4个开放式问题。采用劳希方法进行内容效度验证。获得机构伦理批准并取得知情同意后,向121名PG最后一年的学生发放了SFQ(回复率100%)。我们进行了主成分分析(PCA)、结构方程建模(SEM)、卡方检验(χ/df);拟合优度指数(GFI);调整后的GFI;比较拟合指数(CFI)和近似均方根误差(RMSEA)。采用克朗巴哈系数来估计内部一致性。
验证得出一个三因素模型,包括“课程”(42.1%)、“评估”(28%)和“支持”(18.5%)。卡方检验(χ/df比率)<2、CFI(0.78)、GFI(0.72)和RMSEA(0.09)表明该三因素模型对样本数据具有较好的拟合优度。所有提取的因素都具有良好的内部一致性,≥0.9。
我们认为这份23项的SFQ是一个有效且可靠的工具,可用于课程评估,从而在需要时制定修改现有课程的建议,促进项目成果的丰富。