Suppr超能文献

研究生关于医学研究生课程各要素的结构化反馈问卷的编制与验证

Development and validation of a structured feedback questionnaire from postgraduates on various elements of postgraduate medical curriculum.

作者信息

Sugumar Ramya, Kumar Archana Prabu, Maheshkumar K, Padmavathi R, Ramachandran P, Ravichandran Latha, Anandan S, Vijayaraghavan P V

机构信息

Assistant Professor (Pharmacology), Sri Ramachandra Medical College & Research Institute, SRIHER (DU), Chennai, India.

Assistant Professor, Medical Education Unit, College of Medicine & Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.

出版信息

Med J Armed Forces India. 2021 Feb;77(Suppl 1):S57-S64. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical Council of India, introduced the Post Graduate (PG) curriculum as 'Competency Based Medical Education' (CBME). Feedback from the end users is a vital step in curriculum evaluation. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to develop and validate a Structured Feedback Questionnaire (SFQ) for postgraduates, encompassing all the components of the PG-CBME curriculum.

METHODS

SFQ was developed with 23 Likert based questions and four open ended questions. Content validation was done by Lawshe method. After getting institutional ethics clearance and informed consent, SFQ was administered to 121 final year PGs (response rate 100%). We performed Principal component analysis (PCA), Structural equation modeling (SEM), Chi squared test (χ/df); goodness-of-fit index (GFI); adjusted GFI; comparative fit index (CFI) and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA). Cronbach's alpha was done for estimating the internal consistency.

RESULTS

The validation resulted in a three-factor model comprising of "curriculum" (42.1%), "assessment" (28%), and "support" (18.5%). Chi squared test (χ/df ratio) < 2, CFI (0.78), GFI (0.72) and RMSEA (0.09) indicated superior goodness of fit for the three-factor model for the sample data. All the extracted factors had good internal consistency of ≥0.9.

CONCLUSION

We believe that this 23 item SFQ is a valid and reliable tool which can be utilized for curriculum evaluation and thereby formulating recommendations to modify the existing curriculum wherever required, facilitating enriched program outcomes.

摘要

背景

印度医学委员会引入了研究生(PG)课程,即“基于能力的医学教育”(CBME)。终端用户的反馈是课程评估的关键一步。因此,本研究的主要目的是开发并验证一份针对研究生的结构化反馈问卷(SFQ),涵盖PG-CBME课程的所有组成部分。

方法

SFQ包含23个基于李克特量表的问题和4个开放式问题。采用劳希方法进行内容效度验证。获得机构伦理批准并取得知情同意后,向121名PG最后一年的学生发放了SFQ(回复率100%)。我们进行了主成分分析(PCA)、结构方程建模(SEM)、卡方检验(χ/df);拟合优度指数(GFI);调整后的GFI;比较拟合指数(CFI)和近似均方根误差(RMSEA)。采用克朗巴哈系数来估计内部一致性。

结果

验证得出一个三因素模型,包括“课程”(42.1%)、“评估”(28%)和“支持”(18.5%)。卡方检验(χ/df比率)<2、CFI(0.78)、GFI(0.72)和RMSEA(0.09)表明该三因素模型对样本数据具有较好的拟合优度。所有提取的因素都具有良好的内部一致性,≥0.9。

结论

我们认为这份23项的SFQ是一个有效且可靠的工具,可用于课程评估,从而在需要时制定修改现有课程的建议,促进项目成果的丰富。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
8
ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Evaluation.医学学习与教学基础:评估
BMJ. 2003 Feb 15;326(7385):385-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7385.385.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验