Shipley Nathan J, van Riper Carena J, Stewart William, Chu Maria, Stedman Richard C, Dolcos Florin
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Department of Recreation, Sport and Tourism, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, United States.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 19;13:1084741. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1084741. eCollection 2022.
The interrelated concepts of place attachment and place meaning are antecedents to pro-environmental behavior and essential for supporting decisions that foster relationships between people and places. Previous research has argued that affect is instrumental in conceptualizing place-related phenomena but has not yet been considered in terms of discrete emotions. We disentangled the empirical relationships between concepts of place and the emotions of pride and guilt to understand how they collectively contributed to individuals' decisions about environmental sustainability. Specifically, we conducted an online survey of residents living in the Midwestern US and asked questions about their attachments to places and their place-related behavior. We then tested a latent variable path model with first- and second-order factors that shaped the behavioral intentions of survey respondents, as well as evaluated the psychometric properties of a place meaning scale, to uncover the range of reasons why human-nature relationships were formed. Our findings show that multiple place meanings predicted place attachment, which in turn predicted the discrete emotions of pride and guilt. Place attachment, pride, and guilt positively correlated with pro-environmental behavior. We also observed that the relationships between multi-dimensional conceptualizations of place attachment and behavioral intentions were partially mediated by pride but not guilt, as hypothesized in response to the broaden and build theory of positive emotions. This study develops theoretical insights to clarify how cognitive-emotional bonding can lead people to behave in more environmentally friendly ways.
场所依恋和场所意义这两个相互关联的概念是亲环境行为的前提,对于支持促进人与场所之间关系的决策至关重要。先前的研究认为,情感在概念化与场所相关的现象中具有重要作用,但尚未从离散情绪的角度进行考虑。我们厘清了场所概念与自豪和内疚情绪之间的实证关系,以了解它们如何共同影响个体关于环境可持续性的决策。具体而言,我们对居住在美国中西部的居民进行了一项在线调查,询问了他们对场所的依恋以及与场所相关的行为。然后,我们测试了一个具有一阶和二阶因素的潜在变量路径模型,该模型塑造了调查对象的行为意图,并评估了场所意义量表的心理测量特性,以揭示形成人与自然关系的各种原因。我们的研究结果表明,多种场所意义预测了场所依恋,而场所依恋又反过来预测了自豪和内疚这两种离散情绪。场所依恋、自豪和内疚与亲环境行为呈正相关。我们还观察到,场所依恋的多维概念与行为意图之间的关系部分由自豪介导,而不是内疚,这与积极情绪的拓展与建构理论的假设一致。本研究提供了理论见解,以阐明认知 - 情感纽带如何引导人们以更环保的方式行事。