Suppr超能文献

情景记忆训练能否改善阿尔茨海默病老年人的情景记忆?

Does Episodic Memory Training Improve Episodic Memory of Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease?

作者信息

Park Jin-Hyuck, Lee Sang Ah

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Korea.

Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea.

出版信息

Brain Neurorehabil. 2020 May 18;13(2):e15. doi: 10.12786/bn.2020.13.e15. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Abstract

To date, it is unclear whether cognitive intervention on episodic memory (EM) is effective in improving all or a subset of EM components in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Therefore, this study investigated effects of EM training on the elderly aged over 65 with AD. For this study, 13 AD patients and 16 healthy older adults were recruited. The pre- and post-test for components of EM was a memory task designed to test memory for object identity ("what"), spatial location ("where"), and temporal order ("when"). Training in the AD group consisted of 16 sessions of practice remembering temporal sequences of different objects being hidden in various locations. At pre-test, accuracy on the "where" and "when" conditions were impaired in the AD patients compared with the healthy elderly (p < 0.01). At post-test, accuracy on the "where" condition was significantly improved (p < 0.05) whereas, there were no significant improvements on the "what" and "when" conditions (p > 0.05). Interestingly, there were no significant improvements in standard neuropsychological measures. These findings suggest that AD, in its early stages, selectively impaired spatial and temporal memory rather than object memory. Additionally, it was observed that EM training in AD had different effects depending on the components of EM.

摘要

迄今为止,尚不清楚针对情景记忆(EM)的认知干预是否能有效改善阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者全部或部分EM成分。因此,本研究调查了EM训练对65岁以上AD老年患者的影响。在本研究中,招募了13名AD患者和16名健康老年人。EM成分的前后测试是一项记忆任务,旨在测试对物体身份(“什么”)、空间位置(“哪里”)和时间顺序(“何时”)的记忆。AD组的训练包括16节练习课,练习记忆不同物体藏在不同位置的时间顺序。在预测试中,与健康老年人相比,AD患者在“哪里”和“何时”条件下的准确率受损(p < 0.01)。在测试后,“哪里”条件下的准确率显著提高(p < 0.05),而“什么”和“何时”条件下没有显著改善(p > 0.05)。有趣的是,标准神经心理学测量没有显著改善。这些发现表明,AD在早期阶段选择性地损害空间和时间记忆,而非物体记忆。此外,观察到AD中的EM训练根据EM成分的不同而产生不同的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0871/9879459/305def0dbf96/bn-13-e15-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验