• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

打击就业领域的歧视:欧洲人权法院实践分析。

Combating discrimination in the field of employment: Analysis of ECtHR practices.

机构信息

Supreme Court, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Department of Theory of Law and State, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.

出版信息

Work. 2023;75(4):1301-1308. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220279.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-220279
PMID:36744357
Abstract

BACKGROUND

EU law states that protection against discrimination arising in employment and employment extends to all grounds provided for by non-discrimination directives adopted in 2000. The scientists have found that the level of discrimination has significant differences depending on the country, as well as in relation to different minority groups. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has consolidated the status of an influential international court and by its decisions can affect the field of employment and at the moment plays the role of an extremely important figure in the development of human rights in Europe and abroad.

OBJECTIVE

The main purpose of this research is to study the practice of ECtHR to combat discrimination in employment and employment relations, because today discrimination, despite its ban at the national and international levels, remains in almost all spheres of public life and hinders the provision of equal rights. In its case-law, the Court has developed arguments concerning the direct protection of human rights, its fundamental freedoms, where discrimination is prohibited in all spheres of public relations.

METHODS

The main method of research was a historical, legal, theoretical and comparative analysis of ECtHR practice.

RESULTS

The previous allocation of discrimination in this area on the basis of race and gender was significantly expanded by issues of gender identity, religion, sexual orientation, which is caused by the development of social relations in the labor market.

CONCLUSION

The article highlights measures aimed at combating and predisposing discrimination in the field of employment.

摘要

背景

欧盟法律规定,在就业和就业方面对歧视的保护扩展到 2000 年通过的非歧视指令所规定的所有理由。科学家们发现,歧视程度因国家而异,也因不同的少数群体而异。欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)已巩固了其作为有影响力的国际法院的地位,并通过其裁决可以影响就业领域,目前在国内外人权发展中发挥着极其重要的作用。

目的

本研究的主要目的是研究欧洲人权法院打击就业和就业关系中的歧视的实践,因为尽管在国家和国际层面上禁止歧视,但歧视在几乎所有公共生活领域仍然存在,并阻碍了平等权利的提供。在其判例法中,法院提出了有关直接保护人权及其基本自由的论点,其中在所有公共关系领域都禁止歧视。

方法

主要的研究方法是对欧洲人权法院实践进行历史、法律、理论和比较分析。

结果

此前,基于种族和性别的歧视在这一领域的分配,由于劳动力市场中社会关系的发展,在性别认同、宗教、性取向等问题上显著扩大。

结论

本文强调了旨在打击和预防就业领域歧视的措施。

相似文献

1
Combating discrimination in the field of employment: Analysis of ECtHR practices.打击就业领域的歧视:欧洲人权法院实践分析。
Work. 2023;75(4):1301-1308. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220279.
2
Psychiatric Commitment: Sixty Years Under the Scrutiny of the European Court of Human Rights.精神病强制收治:在欧洲人权法院审视下的六十年
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 4;12:656791. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.656791. eCollection 2021.
3
Social diversity and access to healthcare in Europe: how does European Union's legislation prevent from discrimination in healthcare?欧洲的社会多样性与医疗保健服务可及性:欧盟立法如何防止医疗保健领域的歧视?
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 14;20(1):1399. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09494-8.
4
Restriction of Access to Healthcare and Discrimination of Individuals of Sexual and Gender Minority: An Analysis of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights from an Ethical Perspective.限制获得医疗保健和歧视性少数群体的个人:从伦理角度分析欧洲人权法院的判决。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 24;19(5):2650. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052650.
5
The highly complex issue of conscientious objection to abortion: can the recent European Court of Human Rights ruling Grimmark v. Sweden redefine the notions of care before freedom of conscience?高度复杂的堕胎异议问题:欧洲人权法院最近在 Grimmark v. Sweden 一案中的裁决能否重新定义良心自由之前的关怀观念?
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2021 Aug;26(4):349-355. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2021.1900564. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
6
Older persons' use of the European Court of Human Rights.老年人对欧洲人权法院的利用。
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2013 Dec;28(4):407-20. doi: 10.1007/s10823-013-9212-7.
7
Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Rights and Interests of Women, -- adopted at the Fifth Session of the Seventh National People's Congress on April 3, 1992.《中华人民共和国妇女权益保障法》——1992年4月3日第七届全国人民代表大会第五次会议通过。
China Popul Today. 1992 Aug;9(4):18-24.
8
Protection of patients' rights in the european court of human rights.欧洲人权法院对患者权利的保护。
Wiad Lek. 2018;71(6):1200-1206.
9
Hepatitis c and human rights: comparison of legal experience of Ukraine and Georgia.丙型肝炎与人权:乌克兰和格鲁吉亚法律经验比较
Wiad Lek. 2018;71(2 pt 2):383-388.
10
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE AS PATIENT'S PROTECTION MEASURE IN JUDICIAL PRACTICE.循证医学作为司法实践中保护患者的措施。
Wiad Lek. 2020;73(12 cz 2):2795-2803.