J Adhes Dent. 2023 Feb 6;25:51-62. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b3868649.
To provide an overview of the in-vitro bond strength of universal adhesives to zirconia and analyze whether these adhesives are a reliable alternative to conventional zirconia primers.
A systematic search was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science databases up to August 2021. Investigations published in English, assessing resin-mediated bond to zirconia using universal adhesives compared to phosphate/silane-based primer or phosphate-based primer were included. After study selection and data extraction, risk of bias analysis was performed. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4, with a random effects model, at a significance level of 0.05.
In total, 23 studies were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Universal adhesives showed higher bond strengths than did phosphate-based primers (p < 0.00001) to aged zirconia without airborne alumina-particle abrasion. Similar results were observed when the zirconia surface was airborne-particle abraded at baseline and after dynamic aging (p < 0.0001). When universal adhesives and phosphate-silane based primers were compared, similar bond strengths (p ≥ 0.001) were observed after surface abrasion, regardless of storage condition.
The results showed that universal adhesives generate higher bond strengths when compared to conventional zirconia primers.
概述通用粘结剂对氧化锆的体外粘结强度,并分析这些粘结剂是否是传统氧化锆底涂剂的可靠替代品。
系统检索 PubMed/Medline、Scopus 和 ISI Web of Science 数据库,检索时间截至 2021 年 8 月。纳入评估通用粘结剂介导的氧化锆粘结强度,与磷酸酯/硅烷基底涂剂或磷酸酯基底涂剂比较的研究。在进行研究选择和数据提取后,进行偏倚风险分析。使用 RevMan 5.4 进行统计分析,采用随机效应模型,显著性水平为 0.05。
共纳入 23 项研究进行定性和定量分析。在未进行氧化铝颗粒喷砂的老化氧化锆上,通用粘结剂的粘结强度明显高于磷酸酯基底涂剂(p < 0.00001)。在基线和动态老化后对氧化锆表面进行喷砂时,也观察到了类似的结果(p < 0.0001)。当比较通用粘结剂和磷酸酯-硅烷基底涂剂时,无论储存条件如何,在表面喷砂后,其粘结强度均相似(p ≥ 0.001)。
结果表明,与传统氧化锆底涂剂相比,通用粘结剂可产生更高的粘结强度。