Abdulsalam Nashwa M, Sridhar Arun M, Tregoning Deanna M, He Beixin J, Jafarvand Mahbod, Mehri Avin, Afroze Tanzina, Chahine Yaacoub, Ko Cynthia W, Akoum Nazem
Division of Cardiology, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, 400 NE Mother Jospeh PI, WA, 98664, Vancouver, USA.
Division of Cardiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Nov;66(8):1827-1835. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01492-1. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring is a commonly used strategy to reduce esophageal thermal injury in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AFib).
We sought to compare the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) between two commonly used esophageal luminal temperature probes.
Consecutive patients undergoing ablation with esophageal luminal temperature monitoring and upper endoscopy within 24 h after ablation were included.
Four hundred forty-five patients (64 ± 10 years, 44% female) were included. Esophageal temperature monitoring was done with a single-sensor probe in 213 (48%) and multi-sensor probe in 232 (52%). Cryoballoon (CB) ablation was performed in 118 (27%) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation in 327 (73%) of patients. EDEL was present in 94 (22.9%) of which 85 were mild, 8 were moderate, and 1 was severe, and none progressed to atrial-esophageal fistula. The use of the multi-sensor probe during CB ablation was associated with a reduction in EDEL compared to single sensor (6.8% vs 24.3%; P = 0.016). Similarly, in the RF ablation group, EDEL was present in 19.5% of the multi-sensor group vs 32.8% in the single-sensor group (P = 0.001). Logistic regression showed that multi-sensor probe use was associated with reduction in EDEL with an odds ratio of 0.23 in CB ablation (P = 0.024) and 0.44 for RF ablation (P = 0.001).
Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring during AFib ablation using a multi-sensor probe was associated with a significant reduction in EDEL compared to a single-sensor probe.
食管腔内温度监测是减少心房颤动(AFib)导管消融术中食管热损伤的常用策略。
我们试图比较两种常用食管腔内温度探头在内镜检查发现的食管病变(EDEL)发生率。
纳入在消融术后24小时内接受食管腔内温度监测和上消化道内镜检查的连续患者。
纳入445例患者(64±10岁,44%为女性)。213例(48%)使用单传感器探头进行食管温度监测,232例(52%)使用多传感器探头。118例(27%)患者进行了冷冻球囊(CB)消融,327例(73%)患者进行了射频(RF)消融。94例(22.9%)存在EDEL,其中85例为轻度,8例为中度,1例为重度,无一例进展为心房食管瘘。与单传感器相比,CB消融期间使用多传感器探头与EDEL减少相关(6.8%对24.3%;P = 0.016)。同样,在RF消融组中,多传感器组EDEL发生率为19.5%,单传感器组为32.8%(P = 0.001)。逻辑回归显示,使用多传感器探头与EDEL减少相关,CB消融的优势比为0.23(P = 0.024),RF消融的优势比为0.44(P = 0.001)。
与单传感器探头相比,房颤消融术中使用多传感器探头进行食管腔内温度监测与EDEL显著减少相关。