Claiborne R A, Paynter D E, Dutt A K, Rowlands J W
Pulmonary Service, John L. McClellan Veterans Memorial Medical Center, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987 Nov;136(5):1095-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/136.5.1095.
An oxygen-conserving delivery system employing a flow reducing oxygen pendant (OP) cannula was evaluated during home use for oxygen savings, cost reduction, and patient acceptance. Twenty-one male outpatients receiving home oxygen from liquid systems by conventional nasal cannula (NC) were fitted with OP and followed for 1 month. Oxyhemoglobin saturations (SaO2) were successfully maintained with a threefold reduction in mean O2 flow rate from 1.45 to 0.46 L/min. Exercise testing demonstrated no change between the 2 systems in either degree of desaturation or duration of exercise. Because the same benefit was achieved at lower O2 flow with the OP, 14 patients were able to utilize their O2 for longer periods of time without refilling their portable liquid units. Liquid O2 use per patient was reduced from 200 pounds/month with NC to 135 pounds/month with OP. In 12 patients who reported full compliance during the study period; a net savings of $141/month/patient was realized. However, 9 of the 21 patients stopped using the OP before completing the study. Patient evaluations of the OP identified several factors leading to poor compliance, including bulkiness and/or poor fit (16 patients), ear discomfort (8 patients), nasal discomfort (6 patients), and required nasal breathing (6 patients). While significant savings were achieved with OP, problems with patient acceptance may limit its practicality, particularly in continuous use situations. The primary benefit of the OP may be in extending the range of portable oxygen systems.
对一种采用流量减少型氧气垂饰(OP)套管的氧气节约输送系统进行了家庭使用评估,以评估其在节省氧气、降低成本和患者接受度方面的效果。21名通过传统鼻导管(NC)从液体系统接受家庭氧气治疗的男性门诊患者安装了OP并随访1个月。氧合血红蛋白饱和度(SaO2)成功维持,平均氧气流速从1.45降至0.46L/min,降低了三倍。运动测试表明,两种系统在去饱和程度或运动持续时间方面均无变化。由于使用OP在较低氧气流速下能获得相同益处,14名患者能够在不重新填充便携式液体装置的情况下更长时间使用氧气。每位患者的液体氧气使用量从使用NC时的每月200磅降至使用OP时的每月135磅。在12名报告在研究期间完全依从的患者中,每位患者每月净节省141美元。然而,21名患者中有9名在完成研究前停止使用OP。患者对OP的评估确定了导致依从性差的几个因素,包括笨重和/或佩戴不合适(16名患者)、耳部不适(8名患者)、鼻部不适(6名患者)以及需要鼻呼吸(6名患者)。虽然OP实现了显著的节省,但患者接受度问题可能会限制其实用性,特别是在持续使用的情况下。OP的主要益处可能在于扩大便携式氧气系统的范围。