Tiep B L, Belman M J, Mittman C, Phillips R, Otsap B
Chest. 1985 Mar;87(3):381-3. doi: 10.1378/chest.87.3.381.
With increasing interest in reducing the cost of oxygen therapy, we recently designed an oxygen-conserving cannula. It reduces the oxygen supply flow necessary to achieve adequate oxygen saturation, but because it requires the use of a reservoir situated under the nose, some patients find it obtrusive. We therefore designed a similar system but displaced the reservoir away from the face and onto the anterior chest wall where it could be hidden from view by the patient's clothing. We evaluated this pendant conserving nasal cannula (PNC) in seven hypoxemic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We compared oxygen saturations achieved using the PNC vs the standard steady flow nasal cannula (SNC) at 0.5 through 4 L/min. The mean improvement in oxygen saturation using the PNC vs the SNC was 3.3 percent at 0.5 L/min, 4.3 percent at 1 L/min and 3.1 percent at 2 L/min. These differences were statistically significant (p less than 0.001). The saturation achieved by the PNC at 0.5 L/min was equivalent to that achieved by the SNC at 1.8 L/min. We conclude that the PNC provides effective oxygen delivery to patients at supply flows substantially less than the SNC. The device is aesthetically acceptable to patients and its widespread use in patients requiring chronic oxygen therapy could bring about significant financial savings.
随着人们对降低氧疗成本的兴趣日益增加,我们最近设计了一种氧节约型鼻导管。它减少了达到足够氧饱和度所需的氧气供应流量,但由于它需要使用位于鼻子下方的储氧器,一些患者觉得它很碍眼。因此,我们设计了一个类似的系统,但将储氧器从面部移到了前胸壁,患者的衣服可以将其遮挡住。我们对7名慢性阻塞性肺疾病低氧血症患者的这种垂饰式氧节约型鼻导管(PNC)进行了评估。我们比较了在0.5至4升/分钟的流量下,使用PNC与标准恒流鼻导管(SNC)时所达到的氧饱和度。使用PNC与SNC相比,在0.5升/分钟时氧饱和度平均提高了3.3%,在1升/分钟时提高了4.3%,在2升/分钟时提高了3.1%。这些差异具有统计学意义(p小于0.001)。PNC在0.5升/分钟时达到的饱和度与SNC在1.8升/分钟时达到的饱和度相当。我们得出结论,PNC在供应流量大大低于SNC的情况下,能为患者提供有效的氧气输送。该装置在美观上为患者所接受,在需要长期氧疗的患者中广泛使用可带来显著的经济节省。