Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; HEALTH Institute, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2023 Mar;162:104272. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104272. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
Smoking cessation is often associated with socioeconomic and intrapersonal vulnerabilities such as psychopathology. Yet, most research that focuses on predicting smoking cessation outcomes tends focus on a small number of possible vulnerabilities. In a secondary data analysis, we developed and empirically evaluated a comprehensive, cumulative vulnerability risk composite reflecting psychologically based transdiagnostic processes, social determinants of health, and psychopathology. Participants were adult smokers who responded to study advertisements (e.g., flyers, newspaper ads, radio announcements) for an in-person delivered 4-session smoking cessation trial (N = 267; 47% female; M = 39.4, SD = 13.8). Results indicated that the decline in point prevalence abstinence (PPA) from quit week to 6-month post-quit was statistically significant (p < .001). There were statistically significant effects of cumulative risk score on the intercept (p < .001) and slope (p = .01). These findings were evident in unadjusted and adjusted (controlling for sex, treatment condition, and nicotine dependence) models. The present results indicate smokers with greater cumulative vulnerability demonstrated poorer smoking cessation outcomes. There may be clinical advantages to better understanding cumulative vulnerability among treatment-seeking smokers and other smoking populations to enhance the impact of public health efforts to reduce smoking.
戒烟通常与社会经济和个人内在的脆弱性有关,例如精神病理学。然而,大多数关注预测戒烟结果的研究往往集中在少数可能的脆弱性上。在二次数据分析中,我们开发并实证评估了一个综合的、累积的脆弱性风险综合指标,反映了基于心理的跨诊断过程、健康的社会决定因素和精神病理学。参与者是对现场提供的 4 节戒烟试验(例如传单、报纸广告、广播公告)的研究广告做出回应的成年吸烟者(N=267;47%为女性;M=39.4,SD=13.8)。结果表明,从戒烟周到戒烟后 6 个月,点患病率(PPA)的下降具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。累积风险评分对截距(p<0.001)和斜率(p=0.01)有统计学显著影响。这些发现存在于未经调整和调整(控制性别、治疗条件和尼古丁依赖)模型中。这些结果表明,累积脆弱性更大的吸烟者戒烟效果更差。更好地了解寻求治疗的吸烟者和其他吸烟人群中的累积脆弱性,可能对增强减少吸烟的公共卫生努力的影响具有临床优势。