Assistant Professor of History, Sungkyunkwan University.
Uisahak. 2022 Dec;31(3):647-689. doi: 10.13081/kjmh.2022.31.647.
This article explores the shaping of gender hierarchy between the nurse and the doctor in modern Japan, through the lens of the Tokyo Imperial University Hospital. I understand gender hierarchy of these two medical professions not just in terms of ranks in hospital bureaucracies, salaries, or educational credentials, but also the ways their work was defined, their skill levels were evaluated, as well as the probability of their united actions as members of a single profession to advocate their shared interests. Tokyo Imperial University is Japan's oldest university, which is the birthplace of modern medical education. The hospital of this university was a symbolic locus for the making of gender hierarchy of the doctor and the nurse, which often transpired in other institutions and articulated in state regulations such as the Nurse Regulations prepared by Home Ministry officials in 1915. In this hospital, doctors who were male, while designing nursing education and labor practices, defined nursing primarily as women's supplementary labor for doctors. While doctors had an exclusive professional territory, such as diagnosis, surgery, and medication, what nurses' exclusive professional territory was undefined and how their skill levels could be evaluated remained unclear. In other words, probationary nurses often worked together with trained nurses, which allowed managers of the hospital to exploit their cheap labor, as well as attenuating the professional authority of the trained nurses. But, this process did not go unchallenged. Leaders of nurses at this hospital, such as Suzuki Masa and Ōzeki Chika did not think that nurses should be subordinated to the doctor. As managers of the Tokyo Imperial University Hospital hired unmarried women to have them endure intense labor with low wages, Ōzeki publicly protested a doctor at Tokyo Imperial University to improve nurses' working environment, and these two soon resigned. After the resignation, Suzuki organized a visiting nurse service company called The Charity Visiting Nurse Corps (jizen kangofukai), and dispatched a group of its member nurses to the clients. Unlike when they worked in the Tokyo Imperial University Hospital, they became an independent service provider, deciding their work schedules, and the fees for their service for themselves. Compared to their wages in the Tokyo Imperial University Hospital, the service fees were two to three times higher in this new company. As nurses came to claim a high pay, visiting nurse service companies of this kind blossomed in Tokyo and other big cities, However, they eventually failed to gain a clear legal definition of what nurses could exclusively do as professionals and how their skills were assessed, and private nurses lost their high demand during the Great Depression. By looking at this process, this article reconfirms the conventional wisdom that the gender hierarchy of doctors and nurses were not biologically given but socially constructed through the interplay of education, employment, state policies, and the market, and considers why nurses' efforts alone could not challenge the entirety of this hierarchy, without institional supports from the state.
本文通过考察东京帝国大学医院,探讨了现代日本护士和医生之间性别等级的形成。我理解这两个医疗职业的性别等级,不仅体现在医院官僚机构中的职位、薪酬或教育资历,还体现在他们的工作定义、技能水平评估,以及作为同一专业的成员联合行动以维护共同利益的可能性。东京帝国大学是日本最古老的大学,也是现代医学教育的发源地。该大学的附属医院是形成医生和护士性别等级的象征性场所,这种等级往往在其他机构中出现,并在 1915 年由内务省官员制定的《护士条例》等国家法规中得到体现。在这家医院里,男性医生在设计护理教育和劳动实践时,将护理主要定义为医生的女性辅助劳动。虽然医生拥有专属的专业领域,如诊断、手术和用药,但护士的专属专业领域尚未明确,其技能水平如何评估也不清楚。换句话说,实习护士经常与受过培训的护士一起工作,这使得医院的管理者可以利用他们的廉价劳动力,同时削弱受过培训的护士的专业权威。但是,这个过程并非没有挑战。该医院的护士领导铃木雅之和大越千鹤并不认为护士应该从属于医生。由于东京帝国大学医院的管理者雇佣未婚女性从事低薪高强度的劳动,大越公开抗议东京帝国大学的一名医生,要求改善护士的工作环境,两人很快辞职。辞职后,铃木组织了一个名为慈善探访护士协会(jizen kangofukai)的探访护士服务公司,并派遣了一组会员护士到客户家中。与在东京帝国大学医院工作时不同,她们成为了独立的服务提供者,可以自行决定工作时间和服务费用。与在东京帝国大学医院的工资相比,在这家新公司的服务费用是两倍到三倍。随着护士开始要求更高的薪酬,这种探访护士服务公司在东京和其他大城市如雨后春笋般涌现,但最终未能明确界定护士作为专业人员可以独家从事的工作内容以及如何评估他们的技能,在大萧条期间,私人护士的需求也下降了。通过观察这个过程,本文再次证实了一个传统观点,即医生和护士的性别等级不是天生的,而是通过教育、就业、国家政策和市场的相互作用而构建的,并思考了为什么没有国家机构的支持,护士的努力本身无法挑战整个等级制度。