MSD, Lucerne, Switzerland.
MSD, Madrid, Spain.
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):283-292. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2174748.
To assess the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation for patients with resected stage IIB/IIC melanoma from a third-party payers' perspective in Switzerland over a lifetime horizon.
A Markov state transition model with four health states (recurrence-free [RF], locoregional recurrence, distant metastases [DM], and death) was developed to determine the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus observation as an adjuvant treatment in patients with stage IIB/IIC melanoma who have undergone complete resection. The model utilized data from the KEYNOTE-716 randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03553836). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (Swiss Franc [CHF] per life year or quality-adjusted life years [QALYs] gained) was calculated. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis and deterministic sensitivity analysis were conducted to assess the robustness of the base case results.
Model results demonstrated that pembrolizumab is highly cost-effective as an adjuvant treatment for resected stage IIB/IIC melanoma versus observation in Switzerland. Base case results showed an ICER of CHF 27,424/QALY (EUR 27,342/QALY; exchange rate: 1 CHF = 0.997 EUR) for pembrolizumab versus observation. Results were most sensitive to changes to transition probabilities from the RF state. Most sensitivity and scenario analyses resulted in ICERs below the willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP) of CHF 100,000. At this WTP, pembrolizumab had a 78.9% probability of being cost-effective versus observation.
Due to a limited follow-up period in the KEYNOTE-716 trial, data from other clinical trials in the advanced melanoma setting were synthesized in a network meta-analysis and used to inform transition probabilities from DM to death in the cost-effectiveness model, to overcome the absence of these data from the trial.
The model demonstrated that pembrolizumab is highly cost-effective versus observation in patients with resected stage IIB/IIC melanoma in Switzerland. The ICER was below the WTP threshold of CHF 100,000, commonly used for cost-effectiveness models in Switzerland.
从第三方支付者的角度,在瑞士,评估帕博利珠单抗辅助治疗与观察用于 IIB/IIC 期黑色素瘤完全切除患者的成本效益,在终身时间范围内。
建立一个马尔可夫状态转移模型,该模型有四个健康状态(无复发生存[RF]、局部区域复发、远处转移[DM]和死亡),以确定帕博利珠单抗辅助治疗 IIB/IIC 期黑色素瘤患者的成本效益,这些患者已接受完全切除。该模型利用了 KEYNOTE-716 随机对照试验的数据(ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03553836)。增量成本效益比(ICER)(瑞士法郎[CHF]每生命年或质量调整生命年[QALYs]获得)被计算。进行了概率敏感性分析和确定性敏感性分析,以评估基础案例结果的稳健性。
模型结果表明,帕博利珠单抗辅助治疗瑞士 IIB/IIC 期黑色素瘤完全切除患者是高度有效的。基础案例结果显示,与观察相比,帕博利珠单抗的 ICER 为 CHF 27424/QALY(EUR 27342/QALY;汇率:1CHF=0.997EUR)。结果对 RF 状态的转移概率的变化最敏感。大多数敏感性和情景分析导致 ICER 低于 100000CHF 的意愿支付阈值(WTP)。在这个 WTP 下,与观察相比,帕博利珠单抗有 78.9%的可能性是有效的。
由于 KEYNOTE-716 试验的随访时间有限,因此在高级黑色素瘤环境中的其他临床试验的网络荟萃分析中综合了数据,并将其用于成本效益模型中从 DM 到死亡的转移概率,以克服试验中缺乏这些数据。
该模型表明,在瑞士,与观察相比,帕博利珠单抗对 IIB/IIC 期黑色素瘤完全切除患者具有高度的成本效益。ICER 低于瑞士常用的 100000CHF 的意愿支付阈值。