• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国安徽省应用微创肺泡表面活性物质治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征合并无创通气的回顾性队列研究。

Less Invasive Surfactant Administration for the Treatment of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome Combined With Noninvasive Ventilation in Anhui Province, China: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.

Department of Pediatrics, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, China.

出版信息

Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2023 Oct;62(9):1109-1117. doi: 10.1177/00099228231152859. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1177/00099228231152859
PMID:36748921
Abstract

The less invasive surfactant application (LISA) technology has been widely used to manage breathing in premature infants. Premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) were retrospectively analyzed and divided into 2 groups according to the drug delivery methods used: LISA versus traditional pulmonary surfactant injection (INSURE). The decrease of transcutaneous saturation (TSO2) and heart rate during surfactant delivery in the LISA group was higher than that in the INSURE group ( < .05). Between the 2 groups, there was no significant difference in the change in partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen value before and after drug delivery; second-use pulmonary surfactant; noninvasive ventilation (NIV) failure rate; incidence of some complications; duration of NIV use; hospitalization time; and mortality ( > .05). However, the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in the LISA group was lower than that in the INSURE group ( < .05). The clinical efficacy of LISA combined with the NIV treatment in premature infants with RDS was clear, and this treatment could reduce the incidence of BPD.

摘要

经鼻持续气道正压通气联合肺表面活性物质治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床研究

相似文献

1
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration for the Treatment of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome Combined With Noninvasive Ventilation in Anhui Province, China: A Retrospective Cohort Study.中国安徽省应用微创肺泡表面活性物质治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征合并无创通气的回顾性队列研究。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2023 Oct;62(9):1109-1117. doi: 10.1177/00099228231152859. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
2
Effects of less invasive surfactant administration versus intubation-surfactant-extubation on bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a single-center, retrospective study from China.经鼻持续气道正压通气与肺表面活性物质联合鼻塞式气道正压通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床疗效比较 目的:探讨经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)与肺表面活性物质(PS)联合鼻塞式气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)的临床疗效。方法:选择 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月在我院接受治疗的 86 例 NRDS 早产儿作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组 43 例。观察组给予 NCPAP 联合 PS 治疗,对照组给予 CPAP 联合 PS 治疗。比较两组患儿的临床疗效、血气指标、机械通气时间、住院时间及不良反应发生情况。结果:观察组患儿的总有效率为 95.35%,明显高于对照组的 76.74%(P<0.05)。治疗后,观察组患儿的 PaO2、SaO2 水平明显高于对照组,PaCO2 水平明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患儿的机械通气时间和住院时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患儿的不良反应总发生率为 4.65%,明显低于对照组的 18.60%(P<0.05)。结论:NCPAP 联合 PS 治疗 NRDS 早产儿的临床疗效优于 CPAP 联合 PS 治疗,能有效改善血气指标,缩短机械通气时间和住院时间,降低不良反应发生率。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Dec 5;22(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02270-x.
3
The influence of the technique of surfactant administration (LISA vs INSURE) on the outcomes of respiratory distress syndrome treatment in preterm infants.表面活性剂给药技术(肺内滴注法与气管插管-肺表面活性物质给药法)对早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征治疗结局的影响。
Dev Period Med. 2019;23(3):163-171. doi: 10.34763/devperiodmed.20192303.163171.
4
Less invasive surfactant administration versus endotracheal surfactant instillation followed by limited peak pressure ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome in China: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.经鼻给予肺表面活性物质与气管内给予肺表面活性物质后行小潮气量通气治疗中国呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的随机对照试验研究方案
Trials. 2020 Jun 11;21(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04390-3.
5
Surfactant administration methods for premature newborns: LISA vs. INSURE comparative analysis.表面活性物质给药方法用于早产儿:LISA 与 INSURE 比较分析。
J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2024;17(2):233-239. doi: 10.3233/NPM-230194.
6
Less invasive surfactant administration versus intubation-surfactant-extubation in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analyses.经鼻持续气道正压通气与常规间歇正压通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床疗效比较
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2024 Jan-Feb;100(1):8-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2023.05.008. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
7
Less invasive surfactant administration via infant feeding tube versus InSurE method in preterm infants: a randomized control trial.经婴儿喂养管给予微创表面活性剂与 InSurE 方法在早产儿中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 19;12(1):21955. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23557-3.
8
A clinical study evaluating the combination of LISA and SNIPPV for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants.一项评估 LISA 和 SNIPPV 联合治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 16;14(1):1429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50303-0.
9
Three-year perinatal outcomes of less invasive beractant administration in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征患者中应用 less invasive beractant 治疗的 3 年围产期结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Aug;33(16):2704-2710. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1557633. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
10
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.在患有呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿中进行的微创表面活性剂给药
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019 Mar;29(3):226-330. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.03.226.