Suppr超能文献

阿糖胞苷为基础的诱导治疗在伴有心脏合并症的 AML 患者中的应用:一项回顾性单中心分析。

Amsacrine-based induction therapy in AML patients with cardiac comorbidities: a retrospective single-center analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine A, University Hospital Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.

Current Affiliation: Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Hematol. 2023 Apr;102(4):755-760. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05111-x. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

Abstract

Intensive chemotherapy is the backbone of induction treatment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, AML patients with concomitant cardiac disease may not be eligible for anthracycline-based therapies. In a small cohort of patients, we have previously shown that anthracycline-free, amsacrine-based chemotherapy TAA (thioguanine, cytarabine, amsacrine) may be as effective as cytarabine/daunorubicin for induction therapy in these patients. In this systematic retrospective single-center analysis, we documented the outcome of 31 patients with significant cardiac comorbidities including coronary heart disease or cardiomyopathy receiving TAA as induction chemotherapy. Median (range) ejection fraction (EF) was 48% (30-67%) in this cohort. Patients with EF below 30% were considered unfit for intensive induction therapy. Event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 1.61, 5.46, and 13.6 months respectively. Poor outcome was primarily related to a high early mortality rate within the first 30 days of therapy, mainly caused by infectious complications. TAA cannot be recommended as a substitute of standard induction for AML patients with significant concomitant cardiac disease. In the era of novel agents, alternative strategies (e.g., hypomethylating agents plus venetoclax) should be considered when anthracycline-based regimens are not suitable.

摘要

强化化疗是急性髓系白血病(AML)诱导治疗的基础。然而,患有合并性心脏疾病的 AML 患者可能不符合蒽环类药物治疗的条件。在一小部分患者中,我们之前已经表明,无蒽环类药物、安吖啶为基础的化疗 TAA(硫鸟嘌呤、阿糖胞苷、安吖啶)可能与阿糖胞苷/柔红霉素一样有效作为这些患者的诱导治疗。在这项系统回顾性单中心分析中,我们记录了 31 名患有严重心脏合并症(包括冠心病或心肌病)的患者的治疗结果,这些患者接受 TAA 作为诱导化疗。该队列的中位(范围)射血分数(EF)为 48%(30-67%)。EF 低于 30%的患者被认为不适合强化诱导治疗。无事件生存(EFS)、总生存(OS)和无复发生存(RFS)分别为 1.61、5.46 和 13.6 个月。不良预后主要与治疗前 30 天内的高早期死亡率有关,主要是由感染并发症引起的。TAA 不能作为有严重合并性心脏疾病的 AML 患者标准诱导治疗的替代品。在新型药物时代,当蒽环类药物方案不适用时,应考虑替代策略(例如,低甲基化剂加 Venetoclax)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/084b/9998561/75d5384f02e3/277_2023_5111_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验