Suppr超能文献

不同未消化中性洗涤纤维浓度和饲草料添加率的饲草料类型对育肥小母牛反刍-瘤胃运动和发酵、全肠道屏障功能以及血液代谢物的影响。

Effect of forage types differing in undigested neutral detergent fiber concentration and forage inclusion rate on reticulo-ruminal motility and fermentation, total tract barrier function, and blood metabolites of finishing beef heifers.

机构信息

Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada.

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad043.

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of forages (BarS vs. STR) that differ in the uNDF concentration and FI rate on ruminal fermentation, total tract barrier function, reticulo-ruminal motility, and blood metabolites of beef heifers. Six ruminally cannulated Hereford × Simmental heifers (699 ± 69.1 kg BW) were used in a 6 × 6 Latin square (26 d periods) with a 2 × 3 factorial treatment arrangement. However, 1 heifer was removed from the study after period 2 due to health problems unrelated to treatment, resulting in an incomplete 6 × 6 Latin square design. Barley grain-based diets were formulated using BarS or wheat STR to alter uNDF (7.1% vs. 8.5% DM) with FI rates of 5%, 10%, or 15% of DM. There were limited interactions between the forage type and FI. DM intake was not affected (P ≥ 0.10) by forage type or FI. Use of STR vs. BarS increased uNDF intake (P < 0.001). Increasing FI increased (P < 0.001) uNDF intake for those fed 15% forage. Ruminal pH was not affected (P ≥ 0.10) by forage type; however, cattle fed 5% FI had lesser (P = 0.017) mean ruminal pH and maximum pH (P = 0.018) than those fed 10% and 15% of forage. The total SCFA concentration was not affected by forage type (P = 0.84) but cattle fed the 5% FI rate had lesser (P < 0.001) molar proportion of acetate when compared with cattle fed 10% and 15% forage. Increasing the FI rate decreased the molar proportion of propionate (P < 0.001). Feeding STR relative to BarS decreased (P = 0.041) the reticulo-ruminal contraction duration. In contrast, cattle fed the 10% and 15% FI rates had a greater (P = 0.028) contraction frequency with lower (P = 0.048) contraction area than those fed 5% forage. Plasma glucose, serum insulin, and serum amyloid A were not affected by forage type or FI rate (P ≥ 0.10). Cattle fed 15% forage had lesser (P = 0.040) concentration of serum haptoglobin when compared with cattle fed 5% or 10% forage. In conclusion, forage type used to affect the dietary uNDF concentration, and FI rate act independently suggesting that the provision of STR to increase uNDF reduces reticulo-ruminal contraction duration and total tract permeability but may not affect ruminal pH. Increasing the FI increased dietary uNDF, stabilized ruminal pH, stimulated more frequent reticulo-ruminal contractions, and may decrease the permeability of the gastrointestinal tract and systemic inflammation.

摘要

本研究评估了不同中性洗涤纤维浓度和纤维消化率的饲草(BarS 与 STR)对肉牛瘤胃发酵、全肠道屏障功能、反刍-瘤胃运动和血液代谢物的影响。6 头安装有瘤胃套管的荷斯坦×西门塔尔杂种肉牛(699 ± 69.1 kg BW)采用 6×6 拉丁方(26 天周期)设计,进行 2×3 因子处理安排。然而,由于与处理无关的健康问题,有 1 头肉牛在第 2 周期后被从研究中移除,导致不完全的 6×6 拉丁方设计。基于大麦谷物的日粮通过使用 BarS 或小麦 STR 来调节中性洗涤纤维(7.1%与 8.5% DM),纤维消化率为 DM 的 5%、10%或 15%。饲草类型和纤维消化率之间的相互作用有限。饲草类型或纤维消化率对干物质采食量没有影响(P≥0.10)。与使用 BarS 相比,使用 STR 增加了中性洗涤纤维的采食量(P<0.001)。增加纤维消化率(P<0.001)会增加 15%饲草采食量的中性洗涤纤维摄入量。瘤胃 pH 不受饲草类型的影响(P≥0.10);然而,与采食 10%和 15%饲草的牛相比,采食 5%纤维消化率的牛的平均瘤胃 pH 和最大 pH 较低(P=0.017 和 P=0.018)。总短链脂肪酸浓度不受饲草类型的影响(P=0.84),但与采食 10%和 15%饲草的牛相比,采食 5%纤维消化率的牛的乙酸摩尔比例较低(P<0.001)。增加纤维消化率会降低丙酸摩尔比例(P<0.001)。与使用 BarS 相比,使用 STR 会降低(P=0.041)反刍-瘤胃收缩的持续时间。相比之下,采食 10%和 15%纤维消化率的牛的收缩频率较高(P=0.028),收缩面积较低(P=0.048),而采食 5%饲草的牛则较低。血浆葡萄糖、血清胰岛素和血清淀粉样蛋白 A 不受饲草类型或纤维消化率的影响(P≥0.10)。与采食 5%或 10%饲草的牛相比,采食 15%饲草的牛的血清结合珠蛋白浓度较低(P=0.040)。总之,饲草类型影响饲粮中性洗涤纤维浓度,纤维消化率独立作用,表明提供 STR 以增加中性洗涤纤维会减少反刍-瘤胃收缩的持续时间和全肠道通透性,但可能不会影响瘤胃 pH。增加纤维消化率会增加饲粮中性洗涤纤维,稳定瘤胃 pH,刺激更频繁的反刍-瘤胃收缩,并可能降低胃肠道通透性和全身炎症。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验