Suppr超能文献

高血压患者中心动脉血压的研究及其与降压药物的关系。

Study of central aortic blood pressure in hypertensive patients & its relation with blood pressure-lowering drugs.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Department of Internal Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Indian J Med Res. 2022 Sep;156(3):524-528. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_608_20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: In clinical settings, peripheral blood pressure (PBP) is measured routinely. It is thought that central blood pressure (CBP) which reflects aortic BP, may be more predictive of outcomes in specific populations. Hence, this study was carried out to measure CBP in patients with hypertension and to see the effect of antihypertensive drugs on CBP.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 134 hypertensive patients and 134 normotensive healthy individuals as controls. Peripheral BPs and CBPs were measured of all patients and controls. The data were correlated and the effect of antihypertensive drugs on CBP was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 134 hypertensive patients, 44 (32.84%) were newly diagnosed and the rest 90 (67.16%) had a history of hypertension and were on treatment. Of these 90 patients on treatment, 37 (41.11%) had uncontrolled peripheral BP and 53 (58.89%) had normal peripheral BP. Of the 134 hypertensive patients, 45 (33.58%) had controlled CBP. In 90 patients, who were on antihypertensive treatment, 45 (50%) had controlled CBP and 45 (50%) had uncontrolled CBP. Patients on calcium channel blockers (CCBs) had better control of CBP.

INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Hypertension is diagnosed mainly by measuring peripheral BP. CBP, which correlates better with the incidence of cardiovascular events, is not routinely measured. Patients with a history of hypertension and on treatment had normal office peripheral BP, but a few of them had high CBP and may require modification in treatment for control of CBP. Control of CBP was better in patients taking CCB.

摘要

背景与目的

在临床环境中,常规测量外周血压(PBP)。人们认为,反映主动脉血压的中心血压(CBP)可能更能预测特定人群的结局。因此,本研究旨在测量高血压患者的 CBP,并观察降压药物对 CBP 的影响。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,共纳入 134 例高血压患者和 134 例血压正常的健康对照者。测量所有患者和对照者的外周血压和中心血压。对数据进行相关性分析,并评估降压药物对 CBP 的影响。

结果

134 例高血压患者中,44 例(32.84%)为初诊患者,其余 90 例(67.16%)有高血压病史且正在接受治疗。在这 90 例接受治疗的患者中,37 例(41.11%)的外周血压未得到控制,53 例(58.89%)的外周血压正常。134 例高血压患者中,45 例(33.58%)的 CBP 得到控制。在接受降压治疗的 90 例患者中,45 例(50%)的 CBP 得到控制,45 例(50%)的 CBP 未得到控制。使用钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)的患者 CBP 控制更好。

解释与结论

高血压主要通过测量外周血压来诊断。CBP 与心血管事件的发生率相关性更好,但未常规测量。有高血压病史且正在接受治疗的患者诊室外周血压正常,但少数患者 CBP 较高,可能需要调整治疗以控制 CBP。使用 CCB 的患者 CBP 控制更好。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

8
Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: the Framingham Heart Study.动脉僵硬度与心血管事件:弗雷明汉心脏研究。
Circulation. 2010 Feb 2;121(4):505-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.886655. Epub 2010 Jan 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验