Associate professor in the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health and in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Maryland School of Medicine in Baltimore.
Assistant professor of pediatrics at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore.
AMA J Ethics. 2023 Feb 1;25(2):E133-140. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2023.133.
Victims of child abuse and neglect come from every racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic background, yet clinical evaluation, reporting to child protective services, and responses to reports inequitably harm Black children and malign families of color. Racial bias and inequity in suspicion, reporting, and substantiation of abuse and neglect and in services offered and delivered, foster care placement, and criminal prosecution are widely documented. In response, clinicians and health care organizations should promote equity by educating clinicians about racial bias, standardizing evaluation using clinical decision support tools, and working with policy makers to support prevention services. If we decide that it is ethically justifiable for clinicians to err on the side of overreporting, we must ensure fair distribution of associated benefits and harms among all children and families.
受虐待和忽视的儿童来自各种种族、民族和社会经济背景,但临床评估、向儿童保护服务机构报告以及对报告的反应不公平地伤害了黑人儿童和有色人种家庭。在怀疑、报告和证实虐待和忽视以及提供和提供服务、寄养安置和刑事起诉方面,种族偏见和不平等得到了广泛的记录。作为回应,临床医生和医疗保健组织应该通过教育临床医生了解种族偏见、使用临床决策支持工具标准化评估以及与政策制定者合作支持预防服务来促进公平。如果我们认为临床医生出于过度报告的目的犯错在道德上是合理的,那么我们必须确保所有儿童和家庭公平分配相关的利益和危害。