Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
The Digital Angiographic Reading Center (DARC), New York, New York.
Ophthalmology. 2023 Jun;130(6):588-597. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
Neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is driven by VEGFs A, C, and D, which promote angiogenesis and vascular permeability. Intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF-A drugs are the standard of care, but these do not inhibit VEGF-C and D, which may explain why many patients fail to respond fully. This trial aimed to test the safety and efficacy of OPT-302, a biologic inhibitor of VEGF-C and D, in combination with the anti-VEGF-A inhibitor ranibizumab.
Dose-ranging, phase 2b, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial.
Participants with treatment-naive nAMD were enrolled from 109 sites across Europe, Israel, and the United States.
Participants were randomized to 6, 4-weekly, intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg OPT-302, 2.0 mg OPT-302, or sham, plus intravitreal 0.5 mg ranibizumab.
The primary outcome was mean change in ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes (comparing baseline with week 24) were the proportion of participants gaining or losing ≥ 15 ETDRS BCVA letters; area under the ETDRS BCVA over time curve; change in spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) central subfield thickness; and change in intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid on SD-OCT.
Of 366 participants recruited from December 1, 2017, to November 30, 2018, 122, 123, and 121 were randomized to 0.5 mg OPT-302, 2.0 mg OPT-302, and sham, respectively. Mean (± standard deviation) visual acuity gain in the 2.0 mg OPT-302 group was significantly superior to sham (+14.2 ± 11.61 vs. +10.8 ± 11.52 letters; P = 0.01). The 0.5 mg OPT-302 group was not significantly different than the sham group (+9.44 ± 11.32 letters; P = 0.83). Compared with sham, the secondary BCVA outcomes favored the 2.0 mg OPT-302 group, with structural outcomes favoring both OPT-302 dosage groups. Adverse events (AEs) were similar across groups, with 16 (13.3%), 7 (5.6%), and 10 (8.3%) participants in the lower-dose, higher-dose, and sham groups, respectively, developing at least 1 serious AE. Two unrelated deaths both occurred in the sham arm.
Significantly superior vision gain was observed with OPT-302 2.0 mg combination therapy, versus standard of care, with favorable safety (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03345082).
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
新生血管(湿性)年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)由 VEGF-A、C 和 D 驱动,这些因子促进血管生成和血管通透性。玻璃体内注射抗 VEGF-A 药物是标准治疗方法,但这些药物不能抑制 VEGF-C 和 D,这可能解释了为什么许多患者不能完全响应。本试验旨在测试 OPT-302(一种 VEGF-C 和 D 的生物抑制剂)联合抗 VEGF-A 抑制剂雷珠单抗的安全性和疗效。
剂量范围、2b 期、随机、双盲、假对照试验。
来自欧洲、以色列和美国的 109 个地点的未经治疗的 nAMD 患者入组。
参与者被随机分配至 6 次、4 周的玻璃体内注射 0.5 mg OPT-302、2.0 mg OPT-302 或假对照,外加玻璃体内注射 0.5 mg 雷珠单抗。
主要结局是 24 周时 ETDRS 最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的平均变化。次要结局(与基线相比 24 周)是获得或失去≥15 ETDRS BCVA 字母的参与者比例;ETDRS BCVA 时间曲线下面积;SD-OCT 中央视网膜下厚度变化;SD-OCT 上视网膜内液和视网膜下液变化。
2017 年 12 月 1 日至 2018 年 11 月 30 日期间,共招募了 366 名患者,其中 122、123 和 121 名患者分别被随机分配至 0.5 mg OPT-302、2.0 mg OPT-302 和假对照组。2.0 mg OPT-302 组的平均视力(±标准差)增益明显优于假对照(+14.2±11.61 比+10.8±11.52 字母;P=0.01)。0.5 mg OPT-302 组与假对照组无显著差异(+9.44±11.32 字母;P=0.83)。与假对照相比,次要 BCVA 结果有利于 2.0 mg OPT-302 组,结构结果有利于两个 OPT-302 剂量组。各组的不良事件(AE)相似,低剂量组、高剂量组和假对照组分别有 16(13.3%)、7(5.6%)和 10(8.3%)名患者发生至少 1 例严重 AE。2 例无关死亡均发生在假对照组。
与标准治疗相比,使用 OPT-302 2.0 mg 联合疗法观察到明显更好的视力增益,安全性良好(临床试验标识符:NCT03345082)。
参考文献后可能有专有或商业披露。