• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How Much Blood Loss Is Too Much for a 1-Level Open Lumbar Fusion?对于单节段开放性腰椎融合术来说,多少失血量算过多?
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):146-155. doi: 10.14444/8395. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
2
How Much Blood Loss Is Appropriate for a 2- to 3-Level Posterior Lumbar Fusion?2至3节腰椎后路融合术的适当失血量是多少?
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):241-249. doi: 10.14444/8423. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
3
Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.选择性腰椎椎间融合术后使用微创融合技术是否与更好的疗效相关?一项全国性前瞻性患者报告结局登记研究的分析。
Spine J. 2017 Jul;17(7):922-932. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
4
Single position lateral decubitus anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and posterior fusion reduces complications and improves perioperative outcomes compared with traditional anterior-posterior lumbar fusion.与传统的前后路腰椎融合术相比,单节段侧卧位前路腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF)联合后路融合术可减少并发症并改善围手术期结局。
Spine J. 2022 Mar;22(3):419-428. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
5
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗肥胖患者的临床疗效比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jun;20(6):644-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.SPINE13794. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
6
Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.I度退行性腰椎滑脱症的微创与开放融合手术:质量结果数据库分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E11. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17188.
7
Complication Risk in Primary and Revision Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparable Alternative to Conventional Open Techniques?初次及翻修微创腰椎椎间融合术的并发症风险:是传统开放技术的可比替代方案?
Global Spine J. 2020 Aug;10(5):619-626. doi: 10.1177/2192568219867289. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
8
Single position circumferential fusion improves operative efficiency, reduces complications and length of stay compared with traditional circumferential fusion.与传统的环形融合相比,单体位环形融合可提高手术效率,减少并发症和住院时间。
Spine J. 2021 May;21(5):810-820. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
9
Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.胸腰段冠状面弯曲顶点多级外侧椎间融合术在成人脊柱畸形手术中联合开放后路内固定及L5-S1椎间融合的效用:32例病例匹配评估
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Feb;26(2):208-219. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.SPINE151543. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
10
Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion enhanced the recovery of patients with the lumbar degenerative disease compared with the conventional posterior procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.与传统后路手术相比,单侧双通道内镜下腰椎椎间融合术可促进腰椎退行性疾病患者的恢复:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Front Neurol. 2023 Jan 10;13:1089981. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1089981. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Patients With Back Pain and Degenerative Disc Disease: An Observational Study From the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network.腰椎融合手术治疗背痛和退行性椎间盘疾病患者:来自加拿大脊柱结局与研究网络的一项观察性研究
Global Spine J. 2022 Oct;12(8):1676-1686. doi: 10.1177/2192568220985470. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
2
A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.一种新型腰椎全关节置换术可能优于融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病:一年时患者报告结局的比较分析。
Spine J. 2021 May;21(5):829-840. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.12.001. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
3
Total and hidden blood loss between open posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by Wiltse approach.经Wiltse入路行开放性后外侧腰椎椎间融合术与经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的总失血量及隐性失血量
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e19864. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019864.
4
Measured Estimated Blood Loss: Interim Analysis of a Prospective Quality Improvement Study.实测与估计失血量:一项前瞻性质量改进研究的中期分析
Am Surg. 2020 Mar 1;86(3):228-231.
5
Measuring clinically relevant improvement after lumbar spine surgery: is it time for something new?测量腰椎手术后临床相关的改善:是否需要新的方法?
Spine J. 2020 Jun;20(6):847-856. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
6
Predictors of Prolonged Length of Stay After Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Multicenter Study.腰椎椎间融合术后住院时间延长的预测因素:一项多中心研究
Global Spine J. 2019 Aug;9(5):466-472. doi: 10.1177/2192568218800054. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
7
Multilevel Arthrodesis for Adult Spinal Deformity: When Should We Anticipate Major Blood Loss?成人脊柱畸形的多级关节融合术:我们何时应预期会出现大量失血?
Spine Deform. 2019 Jan;7(1):141-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.06.012.
8
Costs and complications of increased length of stay following adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.青少年特发性脊柱侧弯手术后住院时间延长的成本与并发症
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2019 Jan;28(1):27-31. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000543.
9
Trends in Lumbar Fusion Procedure Rates and Associated Hospital Costs for Degenerative Spinal Diseases in the United States, 2004 to 2015.美国 2004 年至 2015 年退行性脊柱疾病腰椎融合术率及相关医院费用的变化趋势。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 1;44(5):369-376. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002822.
10
Blood Loss Trends and Financial Implications in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的失血趋势及经济影响
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Oct;31(8):E418-E421. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000689.

对于单节段开放性腰椎融合术来说,多少失血量算过多?

How Much Blood Loss Is Too Much for a 1-Level Open Lumbar Fusion?

作者信息

Chanbour Hani, Chen Jeffrey W, Roth Steven G, Stephens Byron F, Abtahi Amir M, Zuckerman Scott L

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Vanderbilt University, School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):146-155. doi: 10.14444/8395. Epub 2023 Feb 8.

DOI:10.14444/8395
PMID:36754572
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10025837/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the known association between increased estimated blood loss (EBL) and suboptimal perioperative outcomes, the exact threshold of EBL that impacts outcomes following elective spine surgery remains unknown. In a cohort of patients undergoing elective 1-level open posterior lumbar fusion, we sought to identify EBL thresholds associated with: (1) prolonged length of stay (LOS), (2) postoperative complications, and (3) patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center study was performed of patients undergoing elective, 1-level open posterior lumbar fusion with and without interbody fusion between October 2010 and April 2021. The primary exposure variable was EBL. Primary outcomes included: (1) LOS, (2) 30-day complications, and (3) 3-month PROs. Minimum clinically important difference was set at 30% improvement from baseline. For purposes of receiver-operating characteristic curves, LOS was dichotomized as 1 vs ≥2 days.

RESULTS

Of the 2028 patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion surgery, 1183 underwent 1-level fusions, 763 (64.5%) with interbody fusion and 420 (35.5%) without. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) EBL was 350 mL (200-600), and median (IQR) LOS was 2 days (2-3). A positive linear association was found between EBL and LOS ( < 0.001) but not with PROs. EBL above 275 mL was associated with LOS beyond postoperative day 1 (POD1) (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73, 95% CI 0.68-0.78, < 0.001), with no significant association with overall complications or PROs. Median EBL (IQR) was 300 mL (150-500), and median (IQR) LOS was 3 days (2-4). A positive linear association was found between EBL and LOS ( < 0.001) but not with PROs. EBL above 238 mL was associated with LOS beyond POD1 (AUC = 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.85, < 0.001), with no impact on overall complications or PROs.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing 1-level posterior lumbar fusion, EBL volumes greater than 275 and 238 mL in patients with and without interbody fusion, respectively, were associated with increased LOS beyond POD1. No effect was found regarding 30-day complications and 3-month PROs. Although EBL did not directly impact complications or PROs, surgeons may expect longer LOS when higher EBL is reported.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

EBL above 275 mL with an interbody and 238 mL without an interbody were associated with prolonged LOS beyond POD1 in 1-level open lumbar fusion.

摘要

背景

尽管已知估计失血量(EBL)增加与围手术期不良结局相关,但影响择期脊柱手术后结局的EBL确切阈值仍不清楚。在一组接受择期单节段开放性后路腰椎融合术的患者中,我们试图确定与以下情况相关的EBL阈值:(1)住院时间延长(LOS),(2)术后并发症,以及(3)患者报告结局(PROs)。

方法

对2010年10月至2021年4月期间接受择期单节段开放性后路腰椎融合术(有或无椎间融合)的患者进行了一项回顾性单中心研究。主要暴露变量为EBL。主要结局包括:(1)LOS,(2)30天并发症,以及(3)3个月PROs。最小临床重要差异设定为较基线改善30%。为绘制受试者工作特征曲线,将LOS分为1天与≥2天。

结果

在2028例接受后路腰椎融合手术的患者中,1183例行单节段融合术,其中763例(64.5%)行椎间融合,420例(35.5%)未行椎间融合。EBL的中位数(四分位间距[IQR])为350 mL(200 - 600),LOS的中位数(IQR)为2天(2 - 3)。发现EBL与LOS之间存在正线性关联(<0.001),但与PROs无关联。EBL高于275 mL与术后第1天(POD)后住院时间延长相关(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.73,95%置信区间0.68 - 0.78,<0.001),与总体并发症或PROs无显著关联。EBL的中位数(IQR)为300 mL(150 - 500),LOS的中位数(IQR)为3天(2 - 4)。发现EBL与LOS之间存在正线性关联(<0.001),但与PROs无关联。EBL高于238 mL与POD后住院时间延长相关(AUC = 0.78,95%置信区间0.71 - 0.85,<0.001),对总体并发症或PROs无影响。

结论

在接受单节段后路腰椎融合术的患者中,有椎间融合和无椎间融合的患者,EBL分别大于275 mL和238 mL与POD后住院时间延长相关。未发现对30天并发症和3个月PROs有影响。尽管EBL未直接影响并发症或PROs,但当报告的EBL较高时,外科医生可能预期住院时间会更长。

临床意义

在单节段开放性腰椎融合术中,有椎间融合时EBL高于275 mL以及无椎间融合时EBL高于238 mL与POD后住院时间延长相关。