• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 大流行背景下的患者药物警戒随访。

Pharmacovigilance follow-up of patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Centre régional de pharmacovigilance de Bourgogne, University Hospital, 21079 Dijon, France.

Pharmacovigilance, Department of Pharmacology, Pasteur Hospital, 06001 Nice, France.

出版信息

Therapie. 2023 Sep-Oct;78(5):523-529. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.therap.2023.01.004
PMID:36754694
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9851716/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In the context of COVID-19 pandemic, a national pharmacovigilance survey was set up in March 2020. The purpose of this survey was to ensure continuous monitoring of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients with COVID-19, not only related to the drugs used in this indication but also related to all drugs administered to these patients or suspected of having promoted the infection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This descriptive study was based on data extracted from the French Pharmacovigilance Database from 1 January 2020 to 30 September 2021. Misuse was also analysed through the MESANGE project. The ADRs were classified according to three groups: "drugs used to treat COVID-19", "other drugs administered to COVID-19 positive patients" and "drugs suspected of having promoted COVID-19". The data were also presented according to 2 periods (period one was from January to June 2020 and period two from July 2020 onwards).

RESULTS

Among 2189 included cases, 67.1% were serious. Cases were mainly related to "other drugs administrated to COVID-19 positive patients" (58.5%) followed by "drugs used to treat COVID-19" (33.7%) and "drugs suspected of having promoted COVID-19" (7.8%). Drugs used to treat COVID-19 and their main safety profile were different depending on the period: mostly hydroxychloroquine (51%) with heart injury and lopinavir/ritonavir (42%) with liver injury for the first period, and dexamethasone (46%) with hyperglycemia and tocilizumab (28%) with liver injury for the second period. The drugs suspected of worsening COVID-19 differed in both periods especially for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs mainly reported in period 1 (41.5% versus 8.2% in period 2). Other immunosuppressive drugs were in the majority in the second period (85.7%), with mainly methotrexate (15.3%), anti-CD20 (15.3%) and anti-TNF alpha (10.5%). No confirmed safety signal was identified among other drugs administered to patients with COVID-19. The profile of ADRs and suspected drugs was similar between the 2 periods. The study of misuse in outpatient settings identified in both periods mainly hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ivermectin and zinc±vitamin C.

DISCUSSION

This survey, based on real-time pharmacological and medical assessment of ADRs and weekly meetings in a specific national committee, made it possible to identify relevant safety signals which contribute to patient care with no delay. The main safety signal highlighted was serious cardiac damage under hydroxychloroquine, alone or combined with azithromycin and also with lopinavir/ritonavir. This signal has contributed to the evolution of the recommendations for these 2 drugs. The methodology of this survey has been taken over and is still going on for the pharmacovigilance monitoring of vaccines against COVID-19, for monoclonal antibodies used against COVID-19 and also for Paxlovid® (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) which benefit from dedicated surveys.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0d6/9851716/c9b39129872f/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0d6/9851716/707cda9711aa/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0d6/9851716/c9b39129872f/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0d6/9851716/707cda9711aa/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0d6/9851716/c9b39129872f/gr2_lrg.jpg
摘要

介绍

在 COVID-19 大流行背景下,2020 年 3 月开展了一项全国范围的药物警戒调查。该调查的目的是确保持续监测 COVID-19 患者的药物不良反应(ADR),不仅与该适应证下使用的药物相关,还与所有给予这些患者的药物或疑似促进感染的药物相关。

材料与方法

本描述性研究基于 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 9 月 30 日期间从法国药物警戒数据库中提取的数据。误用情况也通过 MESANGE 项目进行了分析。ADR 根据三组进行分类:“用于治疗 COVID-19 的药物”、“给予 COVID-19 阳性患者的其他药物”和“疑似促进 COVID-19 的药物”。还根据两个时期(第一时期为 2020 年 1 月至 6 月,第二时期为 2020 年 7 月以后)呈现数据。

结果

在纳入的 2189 例病例中,67.1%为严重病例。病例主要与“给予 COVID-19 阳性患者的其他药物”(58.5%)相关,其次是“用于治疗 COVID-19 的药物”(33.7%)和“疑似促进 COVID-19 的药物”(7.8%)。用于治疗 COVID-19 的药物及其主要安全性特征因时期而异:第一时期主要为羟氯喹(51%)致心脏损伤和洛匹那韦/利托那韦(42%)致肝损伤,第二时期主要为地塞米松(46%)致高血糖和托珠单抗(28%)致肝损伤。在两个时期中,疑似加重 COVID-19 的药物也有所不同,尤其是非甾体抗炎药主要在第一时期报告(41.5%与第二时期的 8.2%)。在第二时期,大多数为其他免疫抑制剂(85.7%),主要为甲氨蝶呤(15.3%)、抗-CD20(15.3%)和抗 TNF-α(10.5%)。给予 COVID-19 患者的其他药物未发现确认的安全信号。两个时期的 ADR 和疑似药物特征相似。门诊环境中误用的研究在两个时期均发现主要为羟氯喹、阿奇霉素、伊维菌素和锌+维生素 C。

讨论

本调查基于对 ADR 的实时药理学和医学评估以及在一个特定的国家委员会中进行的每周会议,确定了相关的安全信号,这有助于患者的护理而不会有任何延误。突出的主要安全信号是羟氯喹单独或与阿奇霉素联合使用,以及与洛匹那韦/利托那韦联合使用时的严重心脏损伤。这一信号促进了这两种药物的建议演变。该调查的方法已被采用并仍在继续,用于 COVID-19 疫苗的药物警戒监测、用于治疗 COVID-19 的单克隆抗体,以及用于奈玛特韦/利托那韦(nirmatrelvir/ritonavir)的专门调查,后者受益于此。

相似文献

1
Pharmacovigilance follow-up of patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.COVID-19 大流行背景下的患者药物警戒随访。
Therapie. 2023 Sep-Oct;78(5):523-529. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
2
"Off-label" use of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, lopinavir-ritonavir and chloroquine in COVID-19: A survey of cardiac adverse drug reactions by the French Network of Pharmacovigilance Centers.羟氯喹、阿奇霉素、洛匹那韦-利托那韦和氯喹在 COVID-19 中的“超适应证”使用:法国药物警戒中心网络对心脏不良药物反应的调查。
Therapie. 2020 Jul-Aug;75(4):371-379. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 May 7.
3
Off-Label Use of Hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19: Analysis of Reports of Suspected Adverse Reactions From the Italian National Network of Pharmacovigilance.羟氯喹在 COVID-19 中的超适应证使用:来自意大利国家药物警戒网络的疑似不良反应报告分析。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 May;62(5):646-655. doi: 10.1002/jcph.2006. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
4
Adverse drug reactions to chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine in combination with azithromycin in COVID-19 in-patients: data from intensive pharmacovigilance in Morocco, 2020.2020年摩洛哥针对新冠肺炎住院患者使用氯喹/羟氯喹联合阿奇霉素治疗时出现的药物不良反应:强化药物警戒数据
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2023 Dec;396(12):3847-3856. doi: 10.1007/s00210-023-02574-7. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
5
Prescribing practices of lopinavir/ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin during the COVID-19 epidemic crisis and pharmaceutical interventions in a French teaching hospital.在 COVID-19 疫情危机期间洛匹那韦/利托那韦、羟氯喹和阿奇霉素的处方实践以及一家法国教学医院的药物干预措施。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Sep;28(5):242-247. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002449. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
6
Safety profile of COVID-19 drugs in a real clinical setting.在真实临床环境中 COVID-19 药物的安全性概况。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 May;78(5):733-753. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03270-2. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
7
Safety profile of the lopinavir/ritonavir combination before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.洛匹那韦/利托那韦组合在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前及期间的安全性概况。
Therapie. 2023 Jul-Aug;78(4):419-425. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2022.10.066. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
8
Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid®): French pharmacovigilance survey 2022.奈玛特韦/利托那韦(帕罗韦德®):2022年法国药物警戒调查
Therapie. 2023 Sep-Oct;78(5):531-547. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2023.03.001. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
9
Sex Differences in Reported Adverse Drug Reactions to COVID-19 Drugs in a Global Database of Individual Case Safety Reports.在全球个体病例安全报告数据库中 COVID-19 药物不良反应报告的性别差异。
Drug Saf. 2020 Dec;43(12):1309-1314. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-01000-8. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
10
QTc prolongation in COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, azithromycin, or lopinavir/ritonavir: A systematic review and meta-analysis.在接受羟氯喹、氯喹、阿奇霉素或洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗的 COVID-19 患者中出现 QTc 延长:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Jun;30(6):694-706. doi: 10.1002/pds.5234. Epub 2021 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic evaluation of therapeutic effectiveness of Azvudine in treating COVID-19 hospitalized patients: a retrospective cohort study.阿兹夫定治疗 COVID-19 住院患者疗效的系统评价:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Nov 7;14:1453234. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1453234. eCollection 2024.
2
Cardiovascular adverse effects of antiviral therapies for COVID-19: Evidence and plausible mechanisms.2019冠状病毒病抗病毒治疗的心血管不良反应:证据与可能机制
Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2025 Mar;46(3):554-564. doi: 10.1038/s41401-024-01382-w. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
3
Comparison of azvudine, molnupiravir, and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in adult patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.
阿兹夫定、莫努匹韦和奈玛特韦/利托那韦在轻中度 COVID-19 成年患者中的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 9;14(1):3318. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53862-y.
4
Molecular Factors and Pathways of Hepatotoxicity Associated with HIV/SARS-CoV-2 Protease Inhibitors.与 HIV/SARS-CoV-2 蛋白酶抑制剂相关的肝毒性的分子因素和途径。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 27;24(9):7938. doi: 10.3390/ijms24097938.
5
Innate and Adaptive Immunity during SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Biomolecular Cellular Markers and Mechanisms.新型冠状病毒2019感染期间的固有免疫和适应性免疫:生物分子细胞标志物与机制
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Feb 10;11(2):408. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11020408.