Suppr超能文献

创伤超声重点评估对国家急诊 X 射线利用研究胸部决策工具筛查性能的影响。

Effect of the Extended Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma on the Screening Performance of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Chest Decision Instrument.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;81(4):495-500. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.09.027. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Developed to decrease unnecessary thoracic computed tomography use in adult blunt trauma patients, the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) Chest clinical decision instrument does not include the extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (eFAST). We assessed whether eFAST improves the NEXUS Chest clinical decision instrument's diagnostic performance and may replace the chest radiograph (CXR) as a predictor variable.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of prospective data from 8 Level I trauma centers from 2011-2014. We compared performance of modified clinical decision instruments that (1) added eFAST as a predictor (eFAST-added clinical decision instrument), and (2) replaced CXR with eFAST (eFAST-replaced clinical decision instrument), in screening for blunt thoracic injuries.

RESULTS

One thousand nine hundred fifty-seven patients had documented computed tomography, CXR, clinical NEXUS criteria, and adequate eFAST; 624 (31.9%) patients had blunt thoracic injuries, and 126 (6.4%) had major injuries. Compared to the NEXUS Chest clinical decision instrument, the eFAST-added clinical decision instrument demonstrated unchanged screening performance for major injury (sensitivity 0.98 [0.94 to 1.00], specificity 0.28 [0.26 to 0.30]) or any injury (sensitivity 0.97 [0.95 to 0.98], specificity 0.21 [0.19 to 0.23]). The eFAST-replaced clinical decision instrument demonstrated unchanged sensitivity for major injury (sensitivity 0.93 [0.87 to 0.97], specificity 0.31 [0.29 to 0.34]) and decreased sensitivity for any injury (0.93 [0.91 to 0.951] versus 0.97 [0.953 to 0.98]).

CONCLUSION

In our secondary analysis, adding eFAST as a predictor variable did not improve the diagnostic screening performance of the original NEXUS Chest clinical decision instrument; eFAST cannot replace the CXR criterion of the NEXUS Chest clinical decision instrument.

摘要

研究目的

为了减少成人钝器创伤患者中不必要的胸部计算机断层扫描使用,国家紧急 X 射线利用研究(NEXUS)胸部临床决策工具不包括扩展的创伤超声重点评估(eFAST)。我们评估了 eFAST 是否可以提高 NEXUS 胸部临床决策工具的诊断性能,并可能替代胸部 X 光片(CXR)作为预测变量。

方法

我们对 2011 年至 2014 年来自 2 个一级创伤中心的前瞻性数据进行了二次分析。我们比较了以下两种改良临床决策工具的性能:(1)增加 eFAST 作为预测因子(eFAST 添加临床决策工具);(2)用 eFAST 替代 CXR(eFAST 替代临床决策工具),用于筛查钝性胸部损伤。

结果

1957 名患者有记录的计算机断层扫描、CXR、临床 NEXUS 标准和充分的 eFAST;624 名(31.9%)患者有钝性胸部损伤,126 名(6.4%)有严重损伤。与 NEXUS 胸部临床决策工具相比,eFAST 添加临床决策工具在筛查严重损伤方面的性能保持不变(敏感性 0.98 [0.94 至 1.00],特异性 0.28 [0.26 至 0.30])或任何损伤(敏感性 0.97 [0.95 至 0.98],特异性 0.21 [0.19 至 0.23])。eFAST 替代临床决策工具在严重损伤的敏感性保持不变(敏感性 0.93 [0.87 至 0.97],特异性 0.31 [0.29 至 0.34]),但任何损伤的敏感性降低(0.93 [0.91 至 0.951] 与 0.97 [0.953 至 0.98])。

结论

在我们的二次分析中,增加 eFAST 作为预测变量并不能提高原始 NEXUS 胸部临床决策工具的诊断筛查性能;eFAST 不能替代 NEXUS 胸部临床决策工具的 CXR 标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验