• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证 SCALE-CryoAF 风险模型预测冷冻球囊消融术后极晚期心房颤动的复发。

Validation of the SCALE-CryoAF risk model to predict very late return of atrial fibrillation after cryoballoon ablation.

机构信息

Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Nov;66(8):1859-1865. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01494-z. Epub 2023 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1007/s10840-023-01494-z
PMID:36754907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9908502/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To date, few risk models have been validated to predict recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) >1 year after ablation. The SCALE-CryoAF score was previously derived to predict very late return of AF (VLRAF) >1 year following cryoballoon ablation (CBA), with strong predictive ability. In this study, we aim to validate the SCALE-CryoAF score for VLRAF after CBA in a novel patient cohort.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained single-center database was performed. Inclusion criteria were pulmonary vein isolation using CBA 2017-2020. Exclusion criteria included prior ablation, <1-year follow-up, lack of pre-CBA echocardiogram, additional ablation lesion sets, and documented AF recurrence 90-365 days post-CBA. The area under the curve (AUC) of SCALE-CryoAF was compared to the derivation value and other established risk models.

RESULTS

Among 469 CBA performed, 241 (61% male, 62.8 ±11.7 years old) cases were included in analysis. There were 37 (15.4%) patients who developed VLRAF. Patients with VLRAF had a higher SCALE-CryoAF score (VLRAF 5.4 ± 2.7; no VLRAF 3.1 ± 2.9; p<0.001). SCALE-CryoAF was linearly associated with VLRAF (y=14.35x-11.72, R=0.99), and a score > 5 had a 32.7% risk of VLRAF. The SCALE-CryoAF risk model predicted VLRAF with an AUC of 0.74, which was similar to the derivation value (AUC: 0.73) and statistically superior to MB-LATER, CHA2DS2-VASc, and CHADS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The current analysis validates the ability of SCALE-CryoAF to predict VLRAF after CBA in a novel patient cohort. Patients with a high SCALE-CryoAF score should be monitored closely for recurrent AF >1 year following CBA.

摘要

背景

迄今为止,很少有风险模型被验证可预测消融后 1 年以上的复发性心房颤动(AF)。此前,SCALE-CryoAF 评分被用来预测冷冻球囊消融(CBA)后 1 年以上的非常晚期 AF 复发(VLRAF),具有很强的预测能力。在这项研究中,我们旨在验证该评分在新患者队列中预测 CBA 后 VLRAF 的能力。

方法

对前瞻性维护的单中心数据库进行回顾性分析。纳入标准为 2017-2020 年使用 CBA 进行肺静脉隔离。排除标准包括既往消融、随访时间<1 年、术前超声心动图缺失、附加消融线、CBA 后 90-365 天记录到 AF 复发。比较了 SCALE-CryoAF 的曲线下面积(AUC)与原始数据及其他已建立的风险模型。

结果

在 469 例 CBA 中,有 241 例(61%为男性,62.8±11.7 岁)纳入分析。37 例(15.4%)患者发生 VLRAF。发生 VLRAF 的患者 SCALE-CryoAF 评分更高(VLRAF 5.4±2.7;无 VLRAF 3.1±2.9;p<0.001)。SCALE-CryoAF 与 VLRAF 呈线性相关(y=14.35x-11.72,R=0.99),评分>5 时 VLRAF 风险为 32.7%。SCALE-CryoAF 风险模型预测 VLRAF 的 AUC 为 0.74,与原始数据相当(AUC:0.73),且统计学上优于 MB-LATER、CHA2DS2-VASc 和 CHADS 评分。

结论

本分析在新的患者队列中验证了 SCALE-CryoAF 预测 CBA 后 VLRAF 的能力。SCALE-CryoAF 评分高的患者应密切监测 CBA 后 1 年以上的 AF 复发。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a06/9908502/3b594536e75e/10840_2023_1494_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a06/9908502/3fa04070b6f4/10840_2023_1494_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a06/9908502/2f30edd91cbe/10840_2023_1494_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a06/9908502/3b594536e75e/10840_2023_1494_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a06/9908502/3fa04070b6f4/10840_2023_1494_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a06/9908502/2f30edd91cbe/10840_2023_1494_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a06/9908502/3b594536e75e/10840_2023_1494_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the SCALE-CryoAF risk model to predict very late return of atrial fibrillation after cryoballoon ablation.验证 SCALE-CryoAF 风险模型预测冷冻球囊消融术后极晚期心房颤动的复发。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Nov;66(8):1859-1865. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01494-z. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
2
A novel risk model for very late return of atrial fibrillation beyond 1 year after cryoballoon ablation: the SCALE-CryoAF score.一种新的风险模型用于预测冷冻球囊消融后 1 年以上的心房颤动极晚期复发:SCALE-CryoAF 评分。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;58(2):209-217. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00588-x. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
3
Impact of left atrial low-voltage areas during initial ablation procedures on very late recurrence of atrial fibrillation.初始消融程序中左心房低电压区对心房颤动极晚期复发的影响。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Aug;33(8):1697-1704. doi: 10.1111/jce.15607. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
4
Predictors of very late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation.环肺静脉消融术后房颤极晚期复发的预测因素
Clin Cardiol. 2008 Oct;31(10):463-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.20340.
5
Prediction of very late arrhythmia recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: The MB-LATER clinical score.预测房颤射频导管消融术后极晚期心律失常复发:MB-LATER 临床评分。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 20;7:40828. doi: 10.1038/srep40828.
6
Hot Balloon Versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Lesion Characteristics and Middle-Term Outcomes.热球囊与冷冻球囊消融治疗心房颤动:消融灶特征与中期结果。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 May;11(5):e005861. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005861.
7
Balloon warming time is the strongest predictor of late pulmonary vein electrical reconnection following cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation.球囊加温时间是房颤冷冻球囊消融术后晚期肺静脉电重连的最强预测因子。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Sep;10(9):1311-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.06.014. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
8
Very late arrhythmia recurrences in patients with sinus rhythm within the first year after catheter ablation: The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry.心脏中心房颤导管消融注册研究:窦性心律患者导管消融术后 1 年内极晚期心律失常复发。
Europace. 2019 Nov 1;21(11):1646-1652. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz233.
9
The Impact of Left Atrial Surface Area and the Second Generation Cryoballoon on Clinical Outcome of Atrial Fibrillation Cryoablation.左心房表面积和第二代冷冻球囊对心房颤动冷冻消融临床结局的影响
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Jul;38(7):815-24. doi: 10.1111/pace.12637. Epub 2015 May 15.
10
Evaluation of predictive scores for late and very late recurrence after cryoballoon-based ablation of atrial fibrillation.评估基于冷冻球囊消融治疗心房颤动后晚期和极晚期复发的预测评分。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Aug;61(2):321-332. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00778-y. Epub 2020 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Correlation between Preoperative Average Heart Rate and Postoperative Recurrence in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Transcatheter Radiofrequency Ablation.经导管射频消融治疗阵发性心房颤动患者术前平均心率与术后复发的相关性
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Nov 6;25(11):394. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2511394. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Factors predicting the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: A review.导管消融术后心房颤动复发的预测因素:综述
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 6;10(13):e34205. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34205. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Progression of Atrial Fibrillation after Cryoablation or Drug Therapy.冷冻消融或药物治疗后心房颤动的进展。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 12;388(2):105-116. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212540. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
2
Comparison of six risk scores for the prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after cryoballoon-based ablation and development of a simplified method, the 0-1-2 PL score.基于冷冻球囊消融术后房颤复发预测的六种风险评分比较及一种简化方法——0-1-2 PL评分的开发
J Arrhythm. 2021 May 20;37(4):956-964. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12557. eCollection 2021 Aug.
3
Impact of pre-ablation weight loss on the success of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
消融前体重减轻对房颤导管消融成功的影响。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Aug;32(8):2097-2104. doi: 10.1111/jce.15141. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
4
Early Rhythm-Control Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.心房颤动患者的早期节律控制治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 1;383(14):1305-1316. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2019422. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
5
The Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (CIRCA-DOSE) Study Results in Context.冷冻球囊与灌注射频导管消融术(CIRCA-DOSE)研究结果解读。
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2020 Jun 3;9(1):34-39. doi: 10.15420/aer.2019.13.
6
A novel risk model for very late return of atrial fibrillation beyond 1 year after cryoballoon ablation: the SCALE-CryoAF score.一种新的风险模型用于预测冷冻球囊消融后 1 年以上的心房颤动极晚期复发:SCALE-CryoAF 评分。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;58(2):209-217. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00588-x. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
7
Long-Term Outcomes After Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Using the Second-Generation Cryoballoon: Final Results From STOP AF Post-Approval Study.第二代冷冻球囊消融治疗阵发性心房颤动的长期疗效:STOP AF 上市后研究的最终结果。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Mar;5(3):306-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
8
2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.2019年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会对2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会心房颤动患者管理指南的聚焦更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组和心律学会的报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jul 9;74(1):104-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
9
Echocardiographic predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: A literature review.经导管消融术后心房颤动复发的超声心动图预测因素:文献综述。
Cardiol J. 2020;27(6):848-856. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0067. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
10
PLAAF score as a novel predictor of long-term outcome after second-generation cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation.空军总医院评分作为第二代冷冻球囊肺静脉隔离术后长期预后的新预测因子。
Europace. 2018 Nov 1;20(FI_3):f436-f443. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux295.