Murphy J E, Stewart R B
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1979 May;36(5):641-4.
The types of extrapyramidal syndrome (EPS) reactions produced by antipsychotic agents and the prophylactic use of antiparkinson agents in preventing EPS are reviewed. EPS are classified as akathisias, dystonias, parkinson-like symptoms and tardive dyskinesia, and have a varied incidence reported to range from 10.6 to 100%. Incidence may vary with age, gender, drug and dosage. The prophylactic use of antiparkinson agents to prevent EPS is controversial. Many psychiatrists believe the effect of EPS on patients is more harmful than the side effects of anticholinergics, whereas others believe that because of side effects, increased cost, greater risk to tardive dyskinesia and improper use, the use of antiparkinson agents cannot be justified. Most studies of prophylactic use of antiparkinson agents have lacked adequate control groups, adequate blinding procedures for investigators rating EPS, uniform definitions of EPS, random sampling and careful reporting of group characteristics such as dosage and drugs received. There is a lack of definitive studies of the value of antiparkinson agents in preventing the occurrence of EPS in patients receiving antipsychotics. A large, multicenter study should be undertaken to resolve the issue.
本文综述了抗精神病药物引起的锥体外系综合征(EPS)反应类型以及预防EPS的抗帕金森药物的预防性使用。EPS分为静坐不能、肌张力障碍、帕金森样症状和迟发性运动障碍,据报道其发生率各不相同,范围在10.6%至100%之间。发生率可能因年龄、性别、药物和剂量而异。预防性使用抗帕金森药物预防EPS存在争议。许多精神科医生认为EPS对患者的影响比抗胆碱能药物的副作用更有害,而另一些人则认为,由于副作用、成本增加、迟发性运动障碍风险更大以及使用不当,抗帕金森药物的使用不合理。大多数关于预防性使用抗帕金森药物的研究缺乏足够的对照组、对评估EPS的研究人员进行充分的盲法程序、EPS的统一定义、随机抽样以及对剂量和所接受药物等组特征的仔细报告。缺乏关于抗帕金森药物在预防接受抗精神病药物治疗的患者发生EPS方面价值的确定性研究。应开展一项大型多中心研究来解决这个问题。