• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation and comparison of different breast cancer prognosis scores based on gene expression data.基于基因表达数据的不同乳腺癌预后评分评估与比较。
Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Feb 8;25(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01612-9.
2
Comparison of CTS5 risk model and 21-gene recurrence score assay in large-scale breast cancer population and combination of CTS5 and recurrence score to develop a novel nomogram for prognosis prediction.CTS5 风险模型与 21 基因复发评分检测在大型乳腺癌人群中的比较,以及 CTS5 与复发评分的联合应用以开发新的预后预测列线图。
Breast. 2022 Jun;63:61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
3
Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic analysis.肿瘤分析测试指导早期乳腺癌辅助化疗决策:系统评价和经济分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jun;23(30):1-328. doi: 10.3310/hta23300.
4
Building prognostic models for breast cancer patients using clinical variables and hundreds of gene expression signatures.利用临床变量和数百个基因表达特征为乳腺癌患者建立预后模型。
BMC Med Genomics. 2011 Jan 9;4:3. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-4-3.
5
Evaluation and Comparison of Prognostic Multigene Tests in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Which Is the Most Effective? A Literature Review Exploring Clinical Utility to Enhance Therapeutic Management in Luminal Patients.早期乳腺癌预后多基因检测的评估与比较:哪种最有效?一项探索临床应用以加强管腔型患者治疗管理的文献综述
Mol Carcinog. 2025 May;64(5):789-800. doi: 10.1002/mc.23893. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
6
An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostication and treatment benefit prediction model with independent validation.一种经过更新且具有独立验证的PREDICT乳腺癌预后及治疗获益预测模型。
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 May 22;19(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0852-3.
7
Gene expression profiling and expanded immunohistochemistry tests to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer management: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.基因表达谱分析和扩展免疫组织化学检测在乳腺癌管理中指导辅助化疗的应用:系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Oct;17(44):1-302. doi: 10.3310/hta17440.
8
Multigene prognostic tests in breast cancer: past, present, future.乳腺癌中的多基因预后检测:过去、现在与未来。
Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Jan 27;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0514-2.
9
Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.早期浸润性乳腺癌的基因表达谱检测:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(10):1-234. eCollection 2020.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostication and treatment predictions for estrogen receptor positive early-stage breast cancer: incorporating the 70-gene signature into the PREDICT prognostication model.雌激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌的预后评估与治疗预测:将70基因特征纳入PREDICT预后模型
Breast. 2025 Jul 19;83:104542. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104542.
2
Does RSClin provide additional information over classic clinico-pathologic scores (PREDICT 2.1, INFLUENCE 2.0, CTS5)?与经典临床病理评分(PREDICT 2.1、INFLUENCE 2.0、CTS5)相比,RSClin是否能提供更多信息?
Breast. 2025 Jul 4;83:104528. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104528.
3
A Novel Nomogram for Estimating a High-Risk Result in the EndoPredict Test for Estrogen Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Negative Breast Carcinoma.一种用于预测雌激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性乳腺癌EndoPredict检测高风险结果的新型列线图。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 16;17(2):273. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020273.
4
The expression patterns of different cell types and their interactions in the tumor microenvironment are predictive of breast cancer patient response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.不同细胞类型在肿瘤微环境中的表达模式及其相互作用可预测乳腺癌患者对新辅助化疗的反应。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 14:2024.06.14.598770. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.14.598770.
5
Changing the Paradigm in Prognostic Breast Cancer Testing Based on Extracellular Vesicles.基于细胞外囊泡改变乳腺癌预后检测的模式
Res J Biol. 2023 Jun;11(2):23-25. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
6
Molecular subtyping improves breast cancer diagnosis in the Copenhagen Breast Cancer Genomics Study.分子亚型分类提高了哥本哈根乳腺癌基因组研究中的乳腺癌诊断。
JCI Insight. 2024 Apr 8;9(7):e178114. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.178114.
7
Editorial: Cancer genomics in the era of precision medicine.社论:精准医学时代的癌症基因组学
Front Genet. 2024 Feb 16;15:1378917. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1378917. eCollection 2024.
8
An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostic model including the benefits and harms of radiotherapy.一种更新的PREDICT乳腺癌预后模型,包括放疗的益处和危害。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024 Jan 15;10(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41523-024-00612-y.
9
Hepatitis C virus may accelerate breast cancer progression by increasing mutant p53 and c-Myc oncoproteins circulating levels.丙型肝炎病毒可能通过增加循环中突变型 p53 和 c-Myc 癌蛋白的水平来加速乳腺癌的进展。
Breast Cancer. 2024 Jan;31(1):116-123. doi: 10.1007/s12282-023-01519-5. Epub 2023 Nov 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview.2020年癌症统计数据概述。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Apr 5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33588.
2
Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics.校准:预测分析的阿喀琉斯之踵。
BMC Med. 2019 Dec 16;17(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1466-7.
3
Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic analysis.肿瘤分析测试指导早期乳腺癌辅助化疗决策:系统评价和经济分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jun;23(30):1-328. doi: 10.3310/hta23300.
4
Dynamics of breast-cancer relapse reveal late-recurring ER-positive genomic subgroups.乳腺癌复发的动力学揭示了晚期复发的 ER 阳性基因组亚群。
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7748):399-404. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1007-8. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
5
Breast Cancer Treatment: A Review.乳腺癌治疗:综述。
JAMA. 2019 Jan 22;321(3):288-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19323.
6
Independent validation of the PREDICT breast cancer prognosis prediction tool in 45,789 patients using Scottish Cancer Registry data.利用苏格兰癌症登记处的数据对 PREDICT 乳腺癌预后预测工具在 45789 名患者中的独立验证。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Oct;119(7):808-814. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0256-x. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
7
Clinical application and utility of genomic assays in early-stage breast cancer: key lessons learned to date.基因组分析在早期乳腺癌中的临床应用及效用:迄今获得的关键经验教训。
Curr Oncol. 2018 Jun;25(Suppl 1):S125-S130. doi: 10.3747/co.25.3814. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
8
A European, Observational Study of Endocrine Therapy Administration in Patients With an Initial Diagnosis of Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.一项针对初始诊断为激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌患者内分泌治疗管理的欧洲观察性研究。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(4):e613-e619. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.11.019. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
9
Breast Cancer Epidemiology, Prevention, and Screening.乳腺癌流行病学、预防和筛查。
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2017;151:1-32. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
10
An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostication and treatment benefit prediction model with independent validation.一种经过更新且具有独立验证的PREDICT乳腺癌预后及治疗获益预测模型。
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 May 22;19(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0852-3.

基于基因表达数据的不同乳腺癌预后评分评估与比较。

Evaluation and comparison of different breast cancer prognosis scores based on gene expression data.

机构信息

Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, East Forvie Building, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Feb 8;25(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01612-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13058-023-01612-9
PMID:36755280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9906838/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is one of the three most common cancers worldwide and is the most common malignancy in women. Treatment approaches for breast cancer are diverse and varied. Clinicians must balance risks and benefits when deciding treatments, and models have been developed to support this decision-making. Genomic risk scores (GRSs) may offer greater clinical value than standard clinicopathological models, but there is limited evidence as to whether these models perform better than the current clinical standard of care.

METHODS

PREDICT and GRSs were adapted using data from the original papers. Univariable Cox proportional hazards models were produced with breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) as the outcome. Independent predictors of BCSS were used to build multivariable models with PREDICT. Signatures which provided independent prognostic information in multivariable models were incorporated into the PREDICT algorithm and assessed for calibration, discrimination and reclassification.

RESULTS

EndoPredict, MammaPrint and Prosigna demonstrated prognostic power independent of PREDICT in multivariable models for ER-positive patients; no score predicted BCSS in ER-negative patients. Incorporating these models into PREDICT had only a modest impact upon calibration (with absolute improvements of 0.2-0.8%), discrimination (with no statistically significant c-index improvements) and reclassification (with 4-10% of patients being reclassified).

CONCLUSION

Addition of GRSs to PREDICT had limited impact on model fit or treatment received. This analysis does not support widespread adoption of current GRSs based on our implementations of commercial products.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌是全球最常见的三种癌症之一,也是女性最常见的恶性肿瘤。乳腺癌的治疗方法多种多样。临床医生在决定治疗方法时必须权衡风险和收益,为此已经开发了模型来支持这一决策。基因组风险评分(GRS)可能比标准临床病理模型具有更大的临床价值,但关于这些模型是否比当前的临床标准护理表现更好的证据有限。

方法

使用原始论文中的数据对 PREDICT 和 GRS 进行了改编。使用乳腺癌特异性生存(BCSS)作为结果生成单变量 Cox 比例风险模型。使用多变量模型中的独立预测因子构建 PREDICT 模型。在多变量模型中提供独立预后信息的特征被纳入 PREDICT 算法,并评估其校准、区分和重新分类。

结果

EndoPredict、MammaPrint 和 Prosigna 在 ER 阳性患者的多变量模型中独立于 PREDICT 具有预后能力;没有评分预测 ER 阴性患者的 BCSS。将这些模型纳入 PREDICT 对校准(绝对改善 0.2-0.8%)、区分(无统计学意义的 c 指数改善)和重新分类(4-10%的患者重新分类)的影响仅略有改善。

结论

将 GRS 添加到 PREDICT 对模型拟合或治疗效果的影响有限。根据我们对商业产品的实施,这项分析不支持广泛采用当前的 GRS。