• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用苏格兰癌症登记处的数据对 PREDICT 乳腺癌预后预测工具在 45789 名患者中的独立验证。

Independent validation of the PREDICT breast cancer prognosis prediction tool in 45,789 patients using Scottish Cancer Registry data.

机构信息

University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2018 Oct;119(7):808-814. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0256-x. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1038/s41416-018-0256-x
PMID:30220705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6189179/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

PREDICT is a widely used online prognostication and treatment benefit tool for patients with early stage breast cancer. The aim of this study was to conduct an independent validation exercise of the most up-to-date version of the PREDICT algorithm (version 2) using real-world outcomes from the Scottish population of women with breast cancer.

METHODS

Patient data were obtained for all Scottish Cancer Registry (SCR) records with a diagnosis of primary invasive breast cancer diagnosed in the period between January 2001 and December 2015. Prognostic scores were calculated using the PREDICT version 2 algorithm. External validity was assessed by statistical analysis of discrimination and calibration. Discrimination was assessed by area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC). Calibration was assessed by comparing the predicted number of deaths to the observed number of deaths across relevant sub-groups.

RESULTS

A total of 45,789 eligible cases were selected from 61,437 individual records. AUC statistics ranged from 0.74 to 0.77. Calibration results showed relatively close agreement between predicted and observed deaths. The 5-year complete follow-up sample reported some overestimation (11.5%), while the 10-year complete follow-up sample displayed more limited overestimation (1.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Validation results suggest that the PREDICT tool remains essentially relevant for contemporary patients with early stage breast cancer.

摘要

背景

PREDICT 是一种广泛使用的在线预后和治疗效益工具,适用于早期乳腺癌患者。本研究的目的是使用来自苏格兰乳腺癌人群的真实数据,对 PREDICT 算法的最新版本(版本 2)进行独立验证。

方法

从 2001 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间苏格兰癌症登记处(SCR)诊断为原发性浸润性乳腺癌的所有 SCR 记录中获取患者数据。使用 PREDICT 版本 2 算法计算预后评分。通过区分度和校准的统计分析评估外部有效性。区分度通过接收者操作特征曲线(AUC)下面积评估。校准通过在相关亚组中比较预测死亡人数与实际死亡人数来评估。

结果

从 61437 份个人记录中选择了 45789 例符合条件的病例。AUC 统计数据范围为 0.74 至 0.77。校准结果表明预测死亡人数与实际死亡人数之间存在相对一致的关系。5 年完整随访样本显示出一定程度的高估(11.5%),而 10 年完整随访样本显示出更有限的高估(1.7%)。

结论

验证结果表明,PREDICT 工具对于当代早期乳腺癌患者仍然具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bb8/6189179/8e1342c2b7c4/41416_2018_256_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bb8/6189179/53c6af3d1a95/41416_2018_256_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bb8/6189179/f384ffa21d6b/41416_2018_256_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bb8/6189179/8e1342c2b7c4/41416_2018_256_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bb8/6189179/53c6af3d1a95/41416_2018_256_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bb8/6189179/f384ffa21d6b/41416_2018_256_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bb8/6189179/8e1342c2b7c4/41416_2018_256_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Independent validation of the PREDICT breast cancer prognosis prediction tool in 45,789 patients using Scottish Cancer Registry data.利用苏格兰癌症登记处的数据对 PREDICT 乳腺癌预后预测工具在 45789 名患者中的独立验证。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Oct;119(7):808-814. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0256-x. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
2
A population-based validation of the prognostic model PREDICT for early breast cancer.基于人群的早期乳腺癌预后模型 PREDICT 的验证。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 May;37(5):411-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
3
Validation of the PREDICT Prognostication Tool in US Patients With Breast Cancer.验证 PREDICT 预后工具在美国乳腺癌患者中的应用。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Oct;21(10):1011-1019.e6. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7048.
4
Validation of the online prediction model CancerMath in the Dutch breast cancer population.验证在线预测模型 CancerMath 在荷兰乳腺癌人群中的应用。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Dec;178(3):665-681. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05399-2. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
5
Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人新诊断慢性淋巴细胞白血病的预后模型:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 31;7(7):CD012022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012022.pub2.
6
Validation of the online prediction tool PREDICT v. 2.0 in the Dutch breast cancer population.在线预测工具PREDICT v. 2.0在荷兰乳腺癌人群中的验证。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:364-372. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.09.031. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
7
Does the SORG Algorithm Predict 5-year Survival in Patients with Chondrosarcoma? An External Validation.SORG 算法能否预测软骨肉瘤患者的 5 年生存率?一项外部验证。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Oct;477(10):2296-2303. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000748.
8
Validity of the prognostication tool PREDICT version 2.2 in Japanese breast cancer patients.预测工具 PREDICT 版本 2.2 在日本乳腺癌患者中的有效性。
Cancer Med. 2021 Mar;10(5):1605-1613. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3713. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
9
Validation of the CancerMath prognostic tool for breast cancer in Southeast Asia.东南亚乳腺癌CancerMath预后工具的验证
BMC Cancer. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):820. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2841-9.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Breast cancer survival and mortality among women with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.2型糖尿病女性的乳腺癌生存与死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 18;15(1):26144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08785-7.
2
Mitigated deployment strategy for ethical AI in clinical settings.临床环境中符合伦理的人工智能的缓解部署策略。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 Jul 13;32(1):e101363. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101363.
3
PIGR predicts good clinical outcomes and plays a tumor suppressor role in the development of breast cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostication and treatment benefit prediction model with independent validation.一种经过更新且具有独立验证的PREDICT乳腺癌预后及治疗获益预测模型。
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 May 22;19(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0852-3.
2
Validity of the online PREDICT tool in older patients with breast cancer: a population-based study.在线PREDICT工具在老年乳腺癌患者中的有效性:一项基于人群的研究。
Br J Cancer. 2016 Feb 16;114(4):395-400. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.466. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
3
Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.
PIGR预示着良好的临床结果,并在乳腺癌发展中发挥肿瘤抑制作用。
Front Oncol. 2025 May 2;15:1439120. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1439120. eCollection 2025.
4
Evaluating PREDICT and developing outcome prediction models in early-onset breast cancer using data from Alberta, Canada.利用加拿大艾伯塔省的数据评估PREDICT并开发早期乳腺癌的预后预测模型。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jun;211(2):399-408. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07654-1. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
5
Benefit from dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: subgroup analyses from the randomised phase 3 PANTHER trial.乳腺癌剂量密集辅助化疗的获益:3期随机PANTHER试验的亚组分析
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Dec 3;49:101162. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101162. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Insights into the performance of PREDICT tool in a large Mainland Chinese breast cancer cohort: a comparative analysis of versions 3.0 and 2.2.深入探究 PREDICT 工具在中国大陆大型乳腺癌队列中的表现:版本 3.0 与 2.2 的对比分析。
Oncologist. 2024 Aug 5;29(8):e976-e983. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae164.
7
An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostic model including the benefits and harms of radiotherapy.一种更新的PREDICT乳腺癌预后模型,包括放疗的益处和危害。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024 Jan 15;10(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41523-024-00612-y.
8
Validation of PREDICT Version 2.2 in a Retrospective Cohort of Indian Women With Operable Breast Cancer.预测版本 2.2 在印度可手术乳腺癌女性回顾性队列中的验证。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Sep;9:e2300114. doi: 10.1200/GO.23.00114.
9
The Role of Nodes and Nodal Assessment in Diagnosis, Treatment and Prediction in ER+, Node-Positive Breast Cancer.淋巴结及其评估在雌激素受体阳性、淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的诊断、治疗及预测中的作用
J Pers Med. 2023 Oct 8;13(10):1476. doi: 10.3390/jpm13101476.
10
Evaluation of Predict, a prognostic risk tool, after diagnosis of a second breast cancer.评估预测工具(Predict)在诊断出第二例乳腺癌后的预后价值。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 Oct 31;7(6). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkad081.
透明报告个体预后或诊断的多变量预测模型(TRIPOD):TRIPOD 声明。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 7;350:g7594. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7594.
4
Inclusion of KI67 significantly improves performance of the PREDICT prognostication and prediction model for early breast cancer.纳入KI67可显著提高早期乳腺癌PREDICT预后和预测模型的性能。
BMC Cancer. 2014 Dec 3;14:908. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-908.
5
PREDICT Plus: development and validation of a prognostic model for early breast cancer that includes HER2.PREDICT Plus:一种包含 HER2 的早期乳腺癌预后模型的开发和验证。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Aug 21;107(5):800-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.338. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
6
Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials.不同化疗方案治疗早期乳腺癌的比较:123 项随机试验 10 万名女性长期结局的荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):432-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61625-5. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
7
A population-based validation of the prognostic model PREDICT for early breast cancer.基于人群的早期乳腺癌预后模型 PREDICT 的验证。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 May;37(5):411-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
8
PREDICT: a new UK prognostic model that predicts survival following surgery for invasive breast cancer.PREDICT:一种新的英国预后模型,可预测浸润性乳腺癌手术后的生存情况。
Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(1):R1. doi: 10.1186/bcr2464. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
9
Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification.通过完全条件设定对离散和连续数据进行多重填补
Stat Methods Med Res. 2007 Jun;16(3):219-42. doi: 10.1177/0962280206074463.
10
A simplified method of calculating an overall goodness-of-fit test for the Cox proportional hazards model.一种用于计算Cox比例风险模型整体拟合优度检验的简化方法。
Lifetime Data Anal. 1998;4(2):109-20. doi: 10.1023/a:1009612305785.